2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
subject to the “protection” clause under section 224 422(a)(2)(C) of BIPA, we propose to continue all exception rates in effect on the same basis. Since section 422(a)(2)(B) of BIPA allows existing exception rates to continue in effect as long as the exception rate exceeds the facility’s updated composite payment rate, we expect that the facilities will compare their existing exception rates to their basic case-mix adjusted composite rates to determine which is the best payment rate for their facility. We expect that each ESRD facility would choose to be paid at the higher of its existing exception rate or its basic case- mix composite rate (which includes all the payment adjustments required under section 623 of the MMA). If the facility retains its exception rate, the rate is not subject to any of the adjustments specified in section 623 of the MMA. We believe the determination as to whether an ESRD facility’s exception rate per treatment will exceed its average case-mix adjusted composite rate per treatment is best left to the affected entity. An ESRD facility that has an existing exception rate may give up that rate if it determines that it should be paid instead under the case-mix adjusted composite rate methodology. In §413.180, we propose to revise our regulations to provide that each ESRD facility must notify its fiscal intermediary (in writing) if it wishes to give up its
exception rate. The facility would be paid based on its case-mix adjusted composite payment rate beginning thirty days after the intermediary’s receipt of written notification that the facility wishes to give up its exception rate. Once a facility notifies its fiscal 225 intermediary that it wishes to give up its exception rate, that decision could not be subsequently rescinded or reversed. We also propose to revise paragraph (b) of this section to provide that ESRD facilities that retain their existing exception rates do not need to notify their intermediaries. Therefore, we propose to remove the last sentence from paragraph (b) that states, “However, a facility may only request an exception or seek to retain its previously approved exception rate when authorized under the conditions specified in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section.” In the past, an ESRD facility could request an exception to its prospective composite payment rate within 180 days of the effective date of its new composite rate(s) or the date on which we opened a specific exception window. Because only pediatric facilities can now file for exceptions, we expect to receive a minimal number of exception applications. In this section, we propose to revise paragraph (d) to remove the requirement that an application for an exception be filed within the 180-day
- Page 173 and 174: 173 wage index values and then simu
- Page 175 and 176: 175 Because Neighborhood Dialysis C
- Page 177 and 178: 177 detected through our receipt of
- Page 179 and 180: 179 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 181 and 182: 181 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 183 and 184: 183 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 185 and 186: 185 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 187 and 188: 187 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 189 and 190: 189 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 191 and 192: 191 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 193 and 194: 193 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 195 and 196: 195 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 197 and 198: 197 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 199 and 200: 199 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 201 and 202: 201 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 203 and 204: 203 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 205 and 206: 205 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 207 and 208: 207 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 209 and 210: 209 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 211 and 212: 211 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 213 and 214: 213 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 215 and 216: 215 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 217 and 218: TABLE 28--Proposed ESRD Wage Index
- Page 219 and 220: ● Extraordinary circumstances (§
- Page 221 and 222: effect as long as the rate exceeds
- Page 223: ● Adding a definition of a “ped
- Page 227 and 228: their intermediaries. Current parag
- Page 229 and 230: 229 costs are reasonable and allowa
- Page 231 and 232: 231 revised paragraph, a facility w
- Page 233 and 234: H. Payment for Covered Outpatient D
- Page 235 and 236: calculation. We also discuss the su
- Page 237 and 238: customers (for example, physicians)
- Page 239 and 240: 239 We believe the weighted average
- Page 241 and 242: number of 11-digit NDCs sold for ea
- Page 243 and 244: 243 included in the template, it is
- Page 245 and 246: current reporting format is an appr
- Page 247 and 248: 247 section 1847A of the Act for th
- Page 249 and 250: each quarter at the following web s
- Page 251 and 252: 251 We also note MedPAC’s recomme
- Page 253 and 254: costs and units. We seek comments a
- Page 255 and 256: 255 pays for DME and associated sup
- Page 257 and 258: pharmacy activities required to get
- Page 259 and 260: 259 representing 42 percent of the
- Page 261 and 262: 261 basic pharmacy services such as
- Page 263 and 264: seek comment on the potential impac
- Page 265 and 266: 265 overpaying for the costs associ
- Page 267 and 268: 267 and information about how pharm
- Page 269 and 270: 269 takes good faith efforts to res
- Page 271 and 272: 271 Specifically, we consider that
- Page 273 and 274: supplies. Using billing data, we id
exception rate. The facility would be paid based on its<br />
case-mix adjusted composite payment rate beginning thirty<br />
days after the intermediary’s receipt <strong>of</strong> written<br />
notification that the facility wishes to give up its<br />
exception rate. Once a facility notifies its fiscal<br />
225<br />
intermediary that it wishes to give up its exception rate,<br />
that decision could not be subsequently rescinded or<br />
reversed. We also propose to revise paragraph (b) <strong>of</strong> this<br />
section to provide that ESRD facilities that retain their<br />
existing exception rates do not need to notify their<br />
intermediaries. Therefore, we propose to remove the last<br />
sentence from paragraph (b) that states, “However, a<br />
facility may only request an exception or seek to retain its<br />
previously approved exception rate when authorized under the<br />
conditions specified in paragraphs (d) and (e) <strong>of</strong> this<br />
section.”<br />
In the past, an ESRD facility could request an<br />
exception to its prospective composite payment rate within<br />
180 days <strong>of</strong> the effective date <strong>of</strong> its new composite rate(s)<br />
or the date on which we opened a specific exception window.<br />
Because only pediatric facilities can now file for<br />
exceptions, we expect to receive a minimal number <strong>of</strong><br />
exception applications. In this section, we propose to<br />
revise paragraph (d) to remove the requirement that an<br />
application for an exception be filed within the 180-day