2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

19.02.2013 Views

30233) and Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities-Update (66 FR 39585)). Table 26 provides a comparison of the current and 164 proposed labor/nonlabor portions of the ESRD base composite rate. TABLE 26--Comparison of the Current and Proposed Labor/Nonlabor Portions of the ESRD Base Composite Rate Hospital-Based Independent Base Composite Rate $132.41 $128.35 Current Labor Share 48.70 52.17 Current NonLabor Share 83.71 76.18 Proposed Labor Share (53.711 percent) 71.12 68.94 Proposed NonLabor Share 61.29 59.41 As indicated earlier in this discussion, the ESRD market basket was derived from CY 1997 data. As with other payment systems, we would propose updating the labor share of the composite payment when the components of the ESRD market basket are rebased to reflect more recent data. g. Implementation of Revised Composite Wage Indexes In the section below, we explain how each ESRD facility’s new composite payment rate would be determined to reflect the proposed 2 year transition, based on section 623(d)(1) of the MMA’s requirement that the application of any revised geographic index be phased in over a multi-year period.

(1) Hospital Data Used In this proposed rule, for purposes of adjusting the 165 labor-related portion of the ESRD composite rate beginning January 1, 2006, we propose to use acute care hospital inpatient wage index data. This data was generated from cost reporting periods beginning FY 2002, and is the most recent complete data available. To determine the applicable ESRD wage index values, we are proposing to use the acute care hospital inpatient wage data without regard to any approved geographic reclassification under section 1886(d)(8) or (d)(10) of the Act, which only applies to hospitals that are paid under the IPPS. We note this policy is consistent with the area wage adjustments used in all other non-acute care facility PPSs (such as, SNFs, IPPSs, HHAs, and IRFs). The proposed wage index values that would be applicable to the ESRD composite rate for services furnished on or after January 1, 2006, are shown in Tables 27 and 28 in this proposed rule. (2) Labor Market Areas with No Hospital Wage Data In adopting OMB’s CBSA designations, we identified a small number of ESRD facilities in both urban and rural geographic areas where there were no hospitals, and, thus, no hospital wage index data on which to base the calculations of the FY 2006 ESRD wage index. The first

(1) Hospital Data Used<br />

In this <strong>proposed</strong> rule, for purposes <strong>of</strong> adjusting the<br />

165<br />

labor-related portion <strong>of</strong> the ESRD composite rate beginning<br />

January 1, <strong>2006</strong>, we propose to use acute care hospital<br />

inpatient wage index data. This data was generated from<br />

cost reporting periods beginning FY 2002, and is the most<br />

recent complete data available.<br />

To determine the applicable ESRD wage index values, we<br />

are proposing to use the acute care hospital inpatient wage<br />

data without regard to any approved geographic<br />

reclassification under section 1886(d)(8) or (d)(10) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Act, which only applies to hospitals that are paid under the<br />

IPPS. We note this policy is consistent with the area wage<br />

adjustments used in all other non-acute care facility PPSs<br />

(such as, SNFs, IPPSs, HHAs, and IRFs).<br />

The <strong>proposed</strong> wage index values that would be applicable<br />

to the ESRD composite rate for services furnished on or<br />

after January 1, <strong>2006</strong>, are shown in Tables 27 and 28 in this<br />

<strong>proposed</strong> rule.<br />

(2) Labor Market Areas with No Hospital Wage Data<br />

In adopting OMB’s CBSA designations, we identified a<br />

small number <strong>of</strong> ESRD facilities in both urban and rural<br />

geographic areas where there were no hospitals, and, thus,<br />

no hospital wage index data on which to base the<br />

calculations <strong>of</strong> the FY <strong>2006</strong> ESRD wage index. The first

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!