2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
30233) and Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities-Update (66 FR 39585)). Table 26 provides a comparison of the current and 164 proposed labor/nonlabor portions of the ESRD base composite rate. TABLE 26--Comparison of the Current and Proposed Labor/Nonlabor Portions of the ESRD Base Composite Rate Hospital-Based Independent Base Composite Rate $132.41 $128.35 Current Labor Share 48.70 52.17 Current NonLabor Share 83.71 76.18 Proposed Labor Share (53.711 percent) 71.12 68.94 Proposed NonLabor Share 61.29 59.41 As indicated earlier in this discussion, the ESRD market basket was derived from CY 1997 data. As with other payment systems, we would propose updating the labor share of the composite payment when the components of the ESRD market basket are rebased to reflect more recent data. g. Implementation of Revised Composite Wage Indexes In the section below, we explain how each ESRD facility’s new composite payment rate would be determined to reflect the proposed 2 year transition, based on section 623(d)(1) of the MMA’s requirement that the application of any revised geographic index be phased in over a multi-year period.
(1) Hospital Data Used In this proposed rule, for purposes of adjusting the 165 labor-related portion of the ESRD composite rate beginning January 1, 2006, we propose to use acute care hospital inpatient wage index data. This data was generated from cost reporting periods beginning FY 2002, and is the most recent complete data available. To determine the applicable ESRD wage index values, we are proposing to use the acute care hospital inpatient wage data without regard to any approved geographic reclassification under section 1886(d)(8) or (d)(10) of the Act, which only applies to hospitals that are paid under the IPPS. We note this policy is consistent with the area wage adjustments used in all other non-acute care facility PPSs (such as, SNFs, IPPSs, HHAs, and IRFs). The proposed wage index values that would be applicable to the ESRD composite rate for services furnished on or after January 1, 2006, are shown in Tables 27 and 28 in this proposed rule. (2) Labor Market Areas with No Hospital Wage Data In adopting OMB’s CBSA designations, we identified a small number of ESRD facilities in both urban and rural geographic areas where there were no hospitals, and, thus, no hospital wage index data on which to base the calculations of the FY 2006 ESRD wage index. The first
- Page 113 and 114: CMS Review 113 As noted previously,
- Page 115 and 116: system that permits the physician a
- Page 117 and 118: 117 associated with the provided se
- Page 119 and 120: 119 overlapping surgeries, the teac
- Page 121 and 122: anesthesia programs that have arran
- Page 123 and 124: 123 Section 623 of the MMA also req
- Page 125 and 126: 125 hospital-based facilities; whil
- Page 127 and 128: 127 The next step would be to devel
- Page 129 and 130: Drugs Second Quarter ASP +6 Percent
- Page 131 and 132: 131 independent facilities, to acco
- Page 133 and 134: 133
- Page 135 and 136: distributed this over a total proje
- Page 137 and 138: 137 additional 0.7 percent addition
- Page 139 and 140: 139 billed drugs regardless of sett
- Page 141 and 142: 141 than 0.9000 are paid more than
- Page 143 and 144: adoption of the new hospital wage i
- Page 145 and 146: of geographic designations for purp
- Page 147 and 148: and they may or may not be suitable
- Page 149 and 150: the Medicare Geographic Classificat
- Page 151 and 152: (2) Metropolitan Divisions Under OM
- Page 153 and 154: 153 applying revised composite paym
- Page 155 and 156: ased on the labor components establ
- Page 157 and 158: 157 actual cost structure faced by
- Page 159 and 160: 159 ESRD facilities is 53.711, as s
- Page 161 and 162: from the cost reports. To avoid dou
- Page 163: from Worksheet A. The resulting mar
- Page 167 and 168: wage data ended. However, since the
- Page 169 and 170: approach to phasing-in the proposed
- Page 171 and 172: facilities that would receive lower
- Page 173 and 174: 173 wage index values and then simu
- Page 175 and 176: 175 Because Neighborhood Dialysis C
- Page 177 and 178: 177 detected through our receipt of
- Page 179 and 180: 179 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 181 and 182: 181 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 183 and 184: 183 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 185 and 186: 185 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 187 and 188: 187 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 189 and 190: 189 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 191 and 192: 191 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 193 and 194: 193 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 195 and 196: 195 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 197 and 198: 197 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 199 and 200: 199 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 201 and 202: 201 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 203 and 204: 203 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 205 and 206: 205 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 207 and 208: 207 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 209 and 210: 209 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 211 and 212: 211 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 213 and 214: 213 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
(1) Hospital Data Used<br />
In this <strong>proposed</strong> rule, for purposes <strong>of</strong> adjusting the<br />
165<br />
labor-related portion <strong>of</strong> the ESRD composite rate beginning<br />
January 1, <strong>2006</strong>, we propose to use acute care hospital<br />
inpatient wage index data. This data was generated from<br />
cost reporting periods beginning FY 2002, and is the most<br />
recent complete data available.<br />
To determine the applicable ESRD wage index values, we<br />
are proposing to use the acute care hospital inpatient wage<br />
data without regard to any approved geographic<br />
reclassification under section 1886(d)(8) or (d)(10) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Act, which only applies to hospitals that are paid under the<br />
IPPS. We note this policy is consistent with the area wage<br />
adjustments used in all other non-acute care facility PPSs<br />
(such as, SNFs, IPPSs, HHAs, and IRFs).<br />
The <strong>proposed</strong> wage index values that would be applicable<br />
to the ESRD composite rate for services furnished on or<br />
after January 1, <strong>2006</strong>, are shown in Tables 27 and 28 in this<br />
<strong>proposed</strong> rule.<br />
(2) Labor Market Areas with No Hospital Wage Data<br />
In adopting OMB’s CBSA designations, we identified a<br />
small number <strong>of</strong> ESRD facilities in both urban and rural<br />
geographic areas where there were no hospitals, and, thus,<br />
no hospital wage index data on which to base the<br />
calculations <strong>of</strong> the FY <strong>2006</strong> ESRD wage index. The first