2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology

19.02.2013 Views

Medicare cost report. However, Worksheet B only includes 160 direct patient care salaries. We had to derive an estimate for non-direct patient care salaries in order to calculate the market basket weight. We first computed the ratio of salaries to total cost in each cost center from the trial balance of the cost report (Worksheet A). We applied these ratios to the costs reported on Worksheet B for the corresponding cost centers to obtain the total wages and salaries for each composite rate cost center. These salaries were then summed and added to the direct patient care salary amount that is reported separately. When divided by total composite rate costs, the result is a cost weight for total salaries. This increased the expenditure weight from 34.154 percent for direct patient care salaries to 38.808 percent for total salaries. (3) Employee Benefits The benefits weight was derived from the BES since a benefit share for all employees is not available for the ESRD Medicare cost reports. The cost reports only reflect benefits for direct patient care. We applied the benefits proportion of wages and salaries for kidney dialysis centers from the BES to the salary amount calculated from the cost reports as described above. This resulted in a benefit weight that was 1.758 percentage points larger (8.850 versus 6.822) than the benefits for direct patient care calculated

from the cost reports. To avoid double counting and to ensure all of the market basket weights still totaled 100 161 percent, we removed this additional 1.758 percentage points for benefits from pharmaceuticals, administrative and general, supplies, laboratory services, housekeeping and operations, and the capital components. This calculation reapportions the benefits expense for each of these categories using a method similar to the method used for distributing non-direct patient care salaries as described above. This method approximates the proportion of each cost center’s costs that are benefits using available salary expenditure data. (4) Professional Fees Professional fees include accounting, bookkeeping, and legal expenses. We derived the weight for professional fees from the BES since the Medicare cost reports do not include this level of detail. We first calculated the ratio of BES professional fees for kidney dialysis centers to total BES wages and salaries for kidney dialysis centers. We applied this ratio to the total wages and salaries share calculated from the cost reports to estimate the proportion of ESRD facility professional fees. The resulting weight was 0.903 percent. To avoid double counting, this proportion was deducted from the calculated weight for the administrative

from the cost reports. To avoid double counting and to<br />

ensure all <strong>of</strong> the market basket weights still totaled 100<br />

161<br />

percent, we removed this additional 1.758 percentage points<br />

for benefits from pharmaceuticals, administrative and<br />

general, supplies, laboratory services, housekeeping and<br />

operations, and the capital components. This calculation<br />

reapportions the benefits expense for each <strong>of</strong> these<br />

categories using a method similar to the method used for<br />

distributing non-direct patient care salaries as described<br />

above. This method approximates the proportion <strong>of</strong> each cost<br />

center’s costs that are benefits using available salary<br />

expenditure data.<br />

(4) Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Fees<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>fee</strong>s include accounting, bookkeeping, and<br />

legal expenses. We derived the weight for pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>fee</strong>s<br />

from the BES since the Medicare cost reports do not include<br />

this level <strong>of</strong> detail. We first calculated the ratio <strong>of</strong> BES<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>fee</strong>s for kidney dialysis centers to total BES<br />

wages and salaries for kidney dialysis centers. We applied<br />

this ratio to the total wages and salaries share calculated<br />

from the cost reports to estimate the proportion <strong>of</strong> ESRD<br />

facility pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>fee</strong>s. The resulting weight was 0.903<br />

percent. To avoid double counting, this proportion was<br />

deducted from the calculated weight for the administrative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!