2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 proposed fee schedule - American Society of Clinical Oncology
to update the labor portion of the ESRD composite rate to 142 which the wage index is applied. The basis for our proposed revisions to the current ESRD composite rate wage index to reflect these changes is set forth in the following sections. a. Current Urban and Rural Locales Based on MSAs We currently adjust the labor-related share of the composite payment rates to account for differences in area wage levels using a wage index which is a blend of two wage index values, one based on hospital wage data from FY 1982, and the other developed from 1980 hospital data from the BLS. The hospital and BLS proportions of the blended wage index are 40 percent and 60 percent, respectively. The hospital and BLS wage index values used to compute the blended wage index were published in the Federal Register on August 15, 1986 (51 FR 29412). The use of a blended wage index results from our effort to transition ESRD facilities from composite payment rates using a wage index based on BLS data, to one developed from hospital wage and employment data obtained from Medicare cost reports (“the hospital wage index”). A major limitation of the BLS wage index was its inability to distinguish area differences in the use of part-time hospital workers. In order to mitigate the impact of changes in facility payment rates as a result of our
adoption of the new hospital wage index, we began a 143 five-year phase-in of the new measure. During the phase-in period, we had intended to use a weighted wage index, under which the BLS portion would decrease 20 percent and the share represented by the hospital wage index would increase 20 percent each year. During the second year of the phase-in, for which the hospital and BLS portions of the wage index were 40 percent and 60 percent, respectively, the wage index was frozen as a result of the OBRA 1990 prohibition on composite payment rate revisions. The wage indexes are calculated for each urban and rural area. In general, an urban area is a MSA or New England County Metropolitan Area as defined by OMB based on 1980 U.S. Census definitions. A rural area consists of all counties within each State outside of an urban area. The counties which comprise the urban locales currently used to compute the wage index values incorporated in the urban composite payment rates were last published in the Federal Register on May 30, 1986 (51 FR 19738-19739). Although OMB has revised the definitions of the MSAs since that time, the composite payment rate urban/rural designations have not been changed due to the prohibition on revising the ESRD payment methodology established under section 4201(a)(2) of OBRA 1990. More current MSAs are used in connection with several other non-acute care Medicare PPSs that we
- Page 91 and 92: ones reconfigured). Yet we also rec
- Page 93 and 94: The issue of payment locality desig
- Page 95 and 96: specialties listed infrequently as
- Page 97 and 98: for premium rating purposes. ISO co
- Page 99 and 100: psychology to the nonsurgical risk
- Page 101 and 102: to anesthesiology which is 2.84 rat
- Page 103 and 104: 103 However, as noted previously in
- Page 105 and 106: ● Category #1: Services that are
- Page 107 and 108: G0270, G0271 and 97802 through 9780
- Page 109 and 110: Group Medical Nutritional Therapy (
- Page 111 and 112: 111 furnished in the group setting
- Page 113 and 114: CMS Review 113 As noted previously,
- Page 115 and 116: system that permits the physician a
- Page 117 and 118: 117 associated with the provided se
- Page 119 and 120: 119 overlapping surgeries, the teac
- Page 121 and 122: anesthesia programs that have arran
- Page 123 and 124: 123 Section 623 of the MMA also req
- Page 125 and 126: 125 hospital-based facilities; whil
- Page 127 and 128: 127 The next step would be to devel
- Page 129 and 130: Drugs Second Quarter ASP +6 Percent
- Page 131 and 132: 131 independent facilities, to acco
- Page 133 and 134: 133
- Page 135 and 136: distributed this over a total proje
- Page 137 and 138: 137 additional 0.7 percent addition
- Page 139 and 140: 139 billed drugs regardless of sett
- Page 141: 141 than 0.9000 are paid more than
- Page 145 and 146: of geographic designations for purp
- Page 147 and 148: and they may or may not be suitable
- Page 149 and 150: the Medicare Geographic Classificat
- Page 151 and 152: (2) Metropolitan Divisions Under OM
- Page 153 and 154: 153 applying revised composite paym
- Page 155 and 156: ased on the labor components establ
- Page 157 and 158: 157 actual cost structure faced by
- Page 159 and 160: 159 ESRD facilities is 53.711, as s
- Page 161 and 162: from the cost reports. To avoid dou
- Page 163 and 164: from Worksheet A. The resulting mar
- Page 165 and 166: (1) Hospital Data Used In this prop
- Page 167 and 168: wage data ended. However, since the
- Page 169 and 170: approach to phasing-in the proposed
- Page 171 and 172: facilities that would receive lower
- Page 173 and 174: 173 wage index values and then simu
- Page 175 and 176: 175 Because Neighborhood Dialysis C
- Page 177 and 178: 177 detected through our receipt of
- Page 179 and 180: 179 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 181 and 182: 181 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 183 and 184: 183 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 185 and 186: 185 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 187 and 188: 187 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 189 and 190: 189 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
- Page 191 and 192: 191 CBSA Code Urban Area Wage (Cons
adoption <strong>of</strong> the new hospital wage index, we began a<br />
143<br />
five-year phase-in <strong>of</strong> the new measure. During the phase-in<br />
period, we had intended to use a weighted wage index, under<br />
which the BLS portion would decrease 20 percent and the<br />
share represented by the hospital wage index would increase<br />
20 percent each year. During the second year <strong>of</strong> the<br />
phase-in, for which the hospital and BLS portions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
wage index were 40 percent and 60 percent, respectively, the<br />
wage index was frozen as a result <strong>of</strong> the OBRA 1990<br />
prohibition on composite payment rate revisions.<br />
The wage indexes are calculated for each urban and<br />
rural area. In general, an urban area is a MSA or New<br />
England County Metropolitan Area as defined by OMB based on<br />
1980 U.S. Census definitions. A rural area consists <strong>of</strong> all<br />
counties within each State outside <strong>of</strong> an urban area. The<br />
counties which comprise the urban locales currently used to<br />
compute the wage index values incorporated in the urban<br />
composite payment rates were last published in the Federal<br />
Register on May 30, 1986 (51 FR 19738-19739). Although OMB<br />
has revised the definitions <strong>of</strong> the MSAs since that time, the<br />
composite payment rate urban/rural designations have not<br />
been changed due to the prohibition on revising the ESRD<br />
payment methodology established under section 4201(a)(2) <strong>of</strong><br />
OBRA 1990. More current MSAs are used in connection with<br />
several other non-acute care Medicare PPSs that we