18.02.2013 Views

I - --ii

I - --ii

I - --ii

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84<br />

ing of the remaining collections of desi germplasm maintained at ICRISAT<br />

Center and future collections of 'the kabuli germplasm will be continued. The<br />

availability of a large number of resistant lines in desi and kabuli background<br />

should help breeders to develop-resistant and high-yielding cultivars.<br />

It was earlier believed that kabulis lack resistant genes to ascochyta blight but<br />

screening a large collection revealed many lines having a high level of resistance.<br />

However, it is worth noting that none of the extra large seeded kabulis had the<br />

desired level of resistances. Most of the resistant lines had small seed size. But is<br />

evident that desis (10.91%) have a higher proportion of resistance thon the<br />

kabulis (0.65%).<br />

Most o1 the resistance sources have their origin in the USSR, Iran, India,<br />

Afghanistan and Turkey., which are belived to be the primary and secondary<br />

centers of the origin of chickpea. The majority of the desi resistant lines was<br />

folad to be black st:eded originating from Iran. Kaiser (1973) also found most of<br />

the resistant lines to be black seeded in Iran. Additional search for sources of<br />

resistance in black-seeded types originating from Iran should result in greater<br />

success. More collections from the region on a priority basis is suggested before<br />

the landraces are replaced by new genotypes.<br />

In the past, lines identified as resistant at one location were usually not tested<br />

out at other locations (Grewal and Vir 1974; Nene et al. 1979). A strong need is<br />

feit to collect all sources of resistance and test them at other locations to identify<br />

lines with a broad spectrum resistance. Also, a line may have become susceptible<br />

in its original habitat due to the emergence of a new race but it may still be<br />

r-,;tant to the original race that may be prevalent elsewhere. For example, C<br />

235, identified as resistant in India during 1962 is now found susceptible there<br />

(Bedi and Athwal 1962) b'it has shown resistance in Syria and some other places.<br />

The international testing of resistant lines through CIABN helped in the<br />

identification of six lines, namely, ILC 72, 191, 194, 202, 3279 and PCh 15,<br />

resistant across locations and/or years. These lines seem to possess location/race<br />

nonspecific or broad spectrum resistance and should be very useful in the future<br />

breeding programs. Such lines were not available earlier. In addition, a large<br />

number of lines, such as ILC 182, 183, 200, 201, 2380 and ICC 1903 were found<br />

promising across locations and years.<br />

The differential reaction of some lines at different locations strongly indicates<br />

the presence of races. Aujla (1964) and Bedi and Aujla (1969) have indicated the<br />

possible existence of races in A. rabiei in India. Later Vir and Grewal (1974)<br />

identified two races and a biotype. The present study indicates the variability in<br />

the blight pathogen in the wider geographic region.<br />

Maximum effort has gone into tackling the blight problem in Pakistan since<br />

the early 1930s, yet the solution is nowhere near. It could be due to lack of either<br />

durable sources of resistance or sustained effort on the part of plant breeders. It<br />

is not only true for Pakistan but also for other parts of the world. In the Mediter­

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!