I - --ii
I - --ii
I - --ii
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
239<br />
conidia were not blown about by wind but were carried in rain water and rain<br />
splashing from diseased plants to healthy adjacent plants when strong winds.<br />
accompanied rains. However, infected parts of the blighted plants become brittle,<br />
break off easily, and are carried by strong winds for some distance (Luthra et<br />
al. 1935).<br />
The viability of the blight fungus in chickpea debris was studied by Luthra et<br />
al. (1935). They found that 1-year old debris carried viruient infection whereas<br />
the infective capacity of the 2-year old debris declined considerably and the 3year<br />
old debris could cause little or no infection. It was not possible to isolate the<br />
fungus from blighted seed kept for 2 years in the laboratory. The blighted debris<br />
exposed to summer rain was rendered less harmful than the material lying in dry<br />
condition where the rainfall was 50 mm. A period of 60-70 days was sufficient to<br />
kill the fungus totally. The diseased debris buried in the soil at any depth from<br />
5-15 cm was rendered harmless for subsequent chickpea crops, especially in the<br />
presence of high soil moisture (Sattar and Hafiz 1952).<br />
Treatment of the infected chickpea seed with sulphur and copper carbonate<br />
could not completely control the disease. The fungus when grown in culture and<br />
kept in dried form retained its viability even after a period of 8 months (Sattar<br />
and Hafiz 1952).<br />
Epidemiology of Chickpea Blight<br />
Serious epidemics of blight have occurred in Pakistan and scientists have tried to<br />
determine a relationship between temperature and rainfall with the spread of the<br />
disease. Because weather data are scarce in the areas where chickpea blight<br />
usually occurs, it has not been possible yet to pinpoint the factors which trigger<br />
the spread of the disease in epidemic form. No regular studies have so far been<br />
made to elucidate the phenomenon.<br />
Kausar (1960, 1968), Kausar and Ahmad (1967) and others have reported<br />
chickpea blight epidemics during the following years:<br />
1928-29, 1929-30 and 1930-31 The crop badly suffered in Attock; the chickpea area<br />
was reduced drastically.<br />
1936-37, 1937-38, 1938-39 and Almost complete failure of the crop in Attock<br />
1939-40 and other adjoining districts.<br />
1947-48, 1948-49, 1949-50, Blight years in succession. The crop suffered to varying<br />
1951-52 and 1953-54 degrees in different years.<br />
1956--57, 1957-58 and 1958-59 Severe blight epidemic in chickpea growing area<br />
1972-73 and 1973-74* Mild blight years<br />
1975-76* Mild blight years<br />
1978-79 and 1979-80" Severe epidemic of chickpea blight.<br />
1980-81* Up to 15% crop loss caused by chickpea Nlight; most of the<br />
chickpea area was diverted to wheat and oilseed crops.<br />
* Annual Research reports, PL-480 Project on Gram Improvement<br />
from 1971-1981, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.