18.02.2013 Views

I - --ii

I - --ii

I - --ii

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

239<br />

conidia were not blown about by wind but were carried in rain water and rain<br />

splashing from diseased plants to healthy adjacent plants when strong winds.<br />

accompanied rains. However, infected parts of the blighted plants become brittle,<br />

break off easily, and are carried by strong winds for some distance (Luthra et<br />

al. 1935).<br />

The viability of the blight fungus in chickpea debris was studied by Luthra et<br />

al. (1935). They found that 1-year old debris carried viruient infection whereas<br />

the infective capacity of the 2-year old debris declined considerably and the 3year<br />

old debris could cause little or no infection. It was not possible to isolate the<br />

fungus from blighted seed kept for 2 years in the laboratory. The blighted debris<br />

exposed to summer rain was rendered less harmful than the material lying in dry<br />

condition where the rainfall was 50 mm. A period of 60-70 days was sufficient to<br />

kill the fungus totally. The diseased debris buried in the soil at any depth from<br />

5-15 cm was rendered harmless for subsequent chickpea crops, especially in the<br />

presence of high soil moisture (Sattar and Hafiz 1952).<br />

Treatment of the infected chickpea seed with sulphur and copper carbonate<br />

could not completely control the disease. The fungus when grown in culture and<br />

kept in dried form retained its viability even after a period of 8 months (Sattar<br />

and Hafiz 1952).<br />

Epidemiology of Chickpea Blight<br />

Serious epidemics of blight have occurred in Pakistan and scientists have tried to<br />

determine a relationship between temperature and rainfall with the spread of the<br />

disease. Because weather data are scarce in the areas where chickpea blight<br />

usually occurs, it has not been possible yet to pinpoint the factors which trigger<br />

the spread of the disease in epidemic form. No regular studies have so far been<br />

made to elucidate the phenomenon.<br />

Kausar (1960, 1968), Kausar and Ahmad (1967) and others have reported<br />

chickpea blight epidemics during the following years:<br />

1928-29, 1929-30 and 1930-31 The crop badly suffered in Attock; the chickpea area<br />

was reduced drastically.<br />

1936-37, 1937-38, 1938-39 and Almost complete failure of the crop in Attock<br />

1939-40 and other adjoining districts.<br />

1947-48, 1948-49, 1949-50, Blight years in succession. The crop suffered to varying<br />

1951-52 and 1953-54 degrees in different years.<br />

1956--57, 1957-58 and 1958-59 Severe blight epidemic in chickpea growing area<br />

1972-73 and 1973-74* Mild blight years<br />

1975-76* Mild blight years<br />

1978-79 and 1979-80" Severe epidemic of chickpea blight.<br />

1980-81* Up to 15% crop loss caused by chickpea Nlight; most of the<br />

chickpea area was diverted to wheat and oilseed crops.<br />

* Annual Research reports, PL-480 Project on Gram Improvement<br />

from 1971-1981, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!