18.02.2013 Views

I - --ii

I - --ii

I - --ii

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

238<br />

4. Mycosphaerella pinodes and Ascochyta pinodella cause severe foot rot<br />

while the others cause leaf, stem and pod blight. A fungus isolated from peas<br />

in Pakistan in association with Ascochyta pisi Lab. is considered to be a<br />

weak parasitic race of' Ascochyta pinodella Jones.<br />

Growth Requirements of the Fungus<br />

A comparative study of nutritional requirements, germination of conidia, pathogenicity<br />

of Ascochyta rabieiand Ascochyta pisi did not indicate a high degree of<br />

specialization of parasitism in the two fungi in infecting chickpea and pea plants.<br />

Of the factors studied, any degree of specialization of parasitism that may be<br />

shown by these two fungi could only be explained on the basis of the presence of<br />

malic acid on the leaves of chickpea plants which was detrimental to the conidia<br />

of Ascochyta pisi (Ahmad 1959).<br />

Sattar and Hafiz (1952) outlined optimum, maximum and minimum temperatures<br />

for growth of the fungus as 25°C, 32.5°C and below 10'C, respectively.<br />

The fungus made maximum growth at about the neutral point and grew fairly<br />

well over a ranee ef pH 4.0-8.8. The germination of spores is very meager, slow<br />

and uncertain in pure water. Their germination is improved by the presence of<br />

N/50 and N/25 malic acid or acidified carbon food. Very few spores germinate<br />

and cause infection during December and January due to very low temperature.<br />

The spores, however, remain viable during freezing temperature and cause infection<br />

in February-March when the temperature varies between 20-27 0 C (Sattar<br />

and Hafiz 1952).<br />

Transmission of Disease<br />

Luthra and Bedi (1932) supported the view that the disease is seed-borne and<br />

suggested the use of seed grown in disease-free localities for the control of the<br />

disease. The importance of secondary infection in widespread attacks of the<br />

disease was recognized as early as 1930. It was pointed out by Sattar (1933) that<br />

the rainfall in summer and in the early growth phase resulted in luxuriant growth<br />

of chickpea and such a crop was most prone to attack. He pointed out that the<br />

parts of Punjab where blight was serious received on average more than 150 mm<br />

rainfall during the chickpea growing season and that blight appeared sporadically<br />

in parts with rainfall less than 87 mm during that period.<br />

Further studies pointed out that blighted plant debris lying in the field on the<br />

surface of soil or threshing floor was a very important source of perpetuating the<br />

disease from year to year as the blight fungus could remain viable in chickpea<br />

plant debris for 2-3 years. Studies on dissemination of the fungus indicated that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!