18.02.2013 Views

I - --ii

I - --ii

I - --ii

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

156<br />

Morpho!ogical and Crop Density Factors<br />

The results given in fable 6 suggest that, under favorable or intermediate<br />

environmental conditions (Jindiress and Tel Haya, respectively), the erect form<br />

of chickpea (ILC 72), when winter sown at 30 p!ants/m 2 , is less productive than<br />

the spreading form (ILC 482) in both drymatter and seed yield. This is particularly<br />

true in the latter case, where, though development of a tall stem structure<br />

may reduce canopy size somewhat (Table 2), it has a significantly greater effect<br />

in reducing the conversion efficiency of dry matter to seed yield. This isexpressed<br />

by harvest index values for the erect cultivar close to 0.41 as compared with<br />

values close to 0.55 for the winter-sown spreading cultivar. This reduced efficiency<br />

of drymatter conversion to seed yield is exemplified in the yield results for the<br />

densely planted treatment (60 plants/m 2 ). The results given in Table 7 show that<br />

this treatment achieved comparable or greater drymatter production than ILC<br />

482 but its seed yield was consistently lower. Also, harvest index was apparently<br />

reduced by increased density in ILC 72 tlereby exaggerating the cu!tivar differential.<br />

This suggests that increasing plant density in erect cultivars may not<br />

necessarily be an efficient manner by which yield levels can be increased, but it is<br />

clear that. higher density plantings would probably outyield erect cultivars planted<br />

at current standard density (30 plants/m 2 ) when moisture conditions prove to<br />

be favorable (Table 7).<br />

Conclusm<strong>ii</strong><br />

Winter planting of chickpea crops in the wetter regions of northern Syria is likely<br />

to be extremely productive. Even at the drier sites., such as Brida, where chickpeas<br />

are not currently grown, at current market prices, this crop would be<br />

competitive with the traditionally grown barley. Nevertheless, our data do suggest<br />

that this crop is sensitive to moisture stress and this could kad to greater<br />

instability of yield and farmer income than is associated with barley. It is likely<br />

that further research efforts can identify crop cultivars and management practices<br />

which reduce the risk factors involved. The results of this study suggest that<br />

breeders should select very early maturing cultivars for the drier regions and that<br />

agronomists should pay further attention to the interaction between moisture<br />

supply, canopy development and productivity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!