18.02.2013 Views

I - --ii

I - --ii

I - --ii

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings of the Workshop on Ascochyta Blight and Winter Sowing ofChickpeas (Saxena, M.C.<br />

and Singh. K.B., eds.), ICARDA. 4-7 May 1981, Aleppo, Syria<br />

Physiological and Moisture-Use Studies on<br />

Growth and Development of<br />

Winter-Sown Chickpeas<br />

J.D.H KEATINGE and P.J.M COOPER<br />

Crop Physiologist and Soil Physicist, respectively, iCARDA, Aleppo, Syria<br />

The adoption of a winter sowing agronornic practice has only become realistic<br />

under Syrian environmental conditions following the development of chickpea<br />

lines resistant to ascochyta blight. Winter sowing is likely to result it, the vegetative<br />

and early reproductive phase of development taking place under cool, moisture<br />

assured conditions, thus deferring the onset of the period of high evaporative<br />

demand and consequent moisture stress to c-op's later growth cycle. Potential<br />

productivity of winter-sown chickpeas should 'hus be enhanced in comparison<br />

with the traditional spring-sown ones.<br />

However, the interactions between physical environmental factors, :uch as<br />

radiant energy interception, moisture supply and temperature, and growth and<br />

development are usually complex. This particular experiment is designed to<br />

investigate these interactions, to examine the intensity and timing of onset of the<br />

significant environmental constraints on potential chickpea productivity. In addition,<br />

the ascochyta blight resistant lines can currently be subdivided in terms of<br />

their br nlching morphology being either of an erect or spreading habit. Such<br />

morphological differences may well result in genotype-environment interaction<br />

and in broad terms these are considered in this experiment.<br />

Methodology<br />

One line representing each morphological group was selected, for the erect group<br />

- ILC 72 and for the sprea'ling group - ILC 482. These lines were handplanted<br />

in early November 1980 at a rate sufficient to achieve what is currently considered<br />

to be optimum stand r'ensity, i.e. 300,000 plants/hectare. An additional<br />

treatment was employed in the erect line in which a superoptimal density of<br />

600,000 plants/ha was established to examine the effect of more rapid canopy<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!