18.02.2013 Views

I - --ii

I - --ii

I - --ii

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The major factors responsible for the improved performance of the winter crop<br />

include the prevalence of a more favorable thermal regime duing its vegatative<br />

and, more importantly, reproductive phases (Tab. 3). Lower temperatures ac­<br />

companied by the shorter day length protract the vegetative phase of the winterplanted<br />

crop and permit the plants to develop a vegetative frame which ensures<br />

not only a better interception of the photosynthetically active radiation (Tab. 4)<br />

early in the season but also provides more nodes which could become reproductive<br />

as soon as the inductive photoperiods become available. This also curtails he<br />

competition between the vegetative and reproductive growth, a feature which is<br />

common in spring-planted crop. The number of filled pods per unit area, therefore,<br />

increases (Tab. 1)in the winter-planted crop enabling it to give higher yields<br />

than the spring-planted crop. The significance of the relative duration of pre- and<br />

postflowering growth in affecting the morphology and economic yield in chickpeas<br />

has also been emphasized by Roberts el al. (1980).<br />

The development of a good vegetative frame early in the season and the<br />

completion of major buildup of the economic yield during the period more<br />

favorable from the stand point of thermal and moisture regimes should make a<br />

winter-planted crop more stable in yield than the conventional spring-planted<br />

crop which develops in an environment of increasing moisture and thermal stress.<br />

Also, since a considerable proportion of the total phytomass of a winter-plamed<br />

crop is produced during the period when the evaporative demand of the atmosphere<br />

is relatively low, such a crop can be extended to nonconventional areas<br />

experiencing relatively lesser rainfall than the traditional chickpea-growing<br />

areas. Thus, the winter planting of chickpeas can provide yet another cropping<br />

alternative to the farmers of dry areas.<br />

Table 4<br />

Plant growth of winter (Nov 30, 1980) and spring (Feb 22, 1981) planted ILC 482 chickpea at Tel<br />

Hadya, evaluated on Apr 9, 1981 when the winter crop started flowering. Photosynthetically active<br />

radiation (PAR) interception by the same on May 19, 1981 when winter crop was at advanced<br />

podding stage and spring crop at early podding.<br />

Character Winter crop Spring crop<br />

Dry weight per plant<br />

Leaves (g) 1.561 ±0.212 0.210±0.038<br />

Stem (g) 1.307±0.184 0.135±0.018<br />

Roots (g) 0.586±0.118 0.075 ±0.011<br />

Nodule (mg) 69.7 ±2.62 56.6± .1.91<br />

Leaf area/plant (cm 2 ) 454.5 ±73.4 73.0± 14.7<br />

Root volume/plant (cm 2 ) 7.45± 1.06 1.75±0.15<br />

PAR interception (%) 77.9 ± 3.55 58.4± 3.38<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!