18.02.2013 Views

I - --ii

I - --ii

I - --ii

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112<br />

where they are not present. Seed treatment, especially of resistant cultivars may<br />

be much more effective both by preventing the entry of new races and reducing<br />

the pathogen population and thus selection pressure. Therefore, the resistant<br />

types that show pod infection may particularly need seed dressing.<br />

Since the time chickpea seed infection was first detected, attempts have been<br />

made to eradicate the pathogen by several treatment-, (Ibragimov et al. i966;<br />

Kaiser et al. 1973; Khachatryan 1961; Luckashevich 1958; Sattar 1933; Zachos<br />

195 1; Zachos et al. 1963). Recently, Reddy (1980) found treatment with calixin<br />

rd (11% tridemorph + 36% maneb) alone or in combination with benlate to<br />

completely eradicate the fungus from naturally infected seed with deep lesions.<br />

The fungicide t~eatment did net affect the germination and there was no noticeable<br />

phytotoxicity. Preliminary studies indicated that seed treatment could also<br />

give protection to the seedlings against the external source of inoculum for up to<br />

2 months. Screening of newer systemic fungicides should be undertaken.<br />

Fokia& Protectants with Resistant Genotypes<br />

It is expected that with the good sources of resistance available at present,<br />

chickpea cultivars with resistance to blight will soon be developed. However,<br />

development of cultivars with durable resistance may take time, so cultivars with<br />

vertical resistance have to be released for cultivation. Due to the existence of<br />

physiologic races in the blight pathogen, the effectiveness of Such resistance is<br />

likely to be lost in time (Hanounik 1980; Singh et al. 1981; Singh, Nene and<br />

,Reddy 1983; Vir and Grewal 1974a). The continuous monetary support for<br />

scientific teams to cope with new races by developing new cultivars puts a<br />

considerable financial strain on governments. Development of new races from<br />

time to time also limits the efforts of plant breeders to make headway with yields.<br />

The combined use of resistant genotypes and effective fungicides may help in<br />

lengthening the life of the cultivars with vertical resistance (Hanounik 1980).<br />

None of the resistant lines identified so far is free from infection even though<br />

they have a very high level of resistance (Singh et al. 1981; Singh, Nene and<br />

Reddy 1983). It is not uncommon in these lines to observe some lesions on stems<br />

causing girdling and with heavy sporulation.Preliminary studies on inoculation of<br />

the lines with isolates from such lesions indicated a higher disease severity. The<br />

application of the fungicide Bravo on resistant genotype ILC 3279 was found to<br />

reduce both disease severity and suppress the development of lesions with heavy<br />

sporulation indicating that combined effects of resistance and fungicide may<br />

prolong the effectivity of resistance (Hanounik 1980).<br />

Further work on these lines with newer systerinac fungicides, different genotype<br />

combinations under different environmental conditions with different races may<br />

prove more fruitful.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!