I - --ii
I - --ii
I - --ii
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
96<br />
(Hawtin and Singh 1983). Asv.-,hyta blight can also limit productivity in Pakistan,<br />
India, Ethiopia and Southern Europe. There are many ways of reducing the<br />
severity of the disease, such as rotation and the application of seed dressings and<br />
ft,;gicides, but resistant cultivars would offer by far the most effective means of<br />
control.<br />
The first resistant desi cultivar, namely, F8, was released 40 years ago in India<br />
(Luthra et al. 1941). This was followed by the release of C 12-34 in 1949 (Ahmed<br />
et al. 1949) and C 727 in 1962 (Aziz 1962) for Pakistan, and C 235 in 1962 (Bedi<br />
and Athwal 1962) for India. However, these cultivars soon became susceptible,<br />
owing to the occurrence of new races of ascochyta blight (Grewal and Vir 1974),<br />
and after 1962 there has been no report of release of a resistant desi cultivar. To<br />
the best knowledge of the authors, no resistant kabuli cultivar has ever been<br />
released for commercial production in "VAVst Asia and North Africa. As a result,<br />
only susceptible cultivars or landraces<br />
are being cultivated in an area in which<br />
ascochyta blight is endemic, restilting in instability of production.<br />
. Recently Kauser (1976) and Retig and Lehrer (1977) have reemphasized the<br />
need for the development of blight-resistant cultivars, and Haq et al. (1981) have<br />
advocated the use of mutation breeding. Several limitations such as the absence<br />
of stable sources of resistance and of effective screening techniques, combined<br />
with inability to identify physiologic races and ignorance of the genetic control of<br />
resistance, have in the past inhibited plant breeders from launching aggressive<br />
breeding programs. Singh el al. (1983) have reported several sources of resistance<br />
and an effective screening technique, and some information is available on<br />
the inheritance of resistance. The time thus seems ripe to attempt solving the<br />
blight disease problem through resistance breeding.<br />
In this paper the progress made at ICARDA through the development of<br />
blight-resistant cultivars, and the future breeding strategies for developing genet<br />
ic material for the endemic areas of the world are discussed.<br />
Genetics of Resistance<br />
Review of Past Work<br />
In 1953, Hafiz and Ashraf reported that the resistance to ascochyta blight was<br />
determined by a single dominant gene in two parents, namely, F8 and FIO. Later<br />
Vir et al. (1975) and Eser (1976) reported a similar finding. Recently Singh and<br />
Reddy (1983) have reported that a single dominant gene conditioned resistance<br />
in four parents, ILC 72, ILC 183, ILC 200 and ICC 4935, whereas the resistance<br />
in ILC 191 was conferred by a single recessive gene. This was the first report on<br />
identification of a recessive gene governing resistance to blight. A summary of<br />
current information on inheritance of resistance is given in Tab. 1.<br />
Now that a number of resistant sources have been identified at Tel Hadya and