18.02.2013 Views

I - --ii

I - --ii

I - --ii

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96<br />

(Hawtin and Singh 1983). Asv.-,hyta blight can also limit productivity in Pakistan,<br />

India, Ethiopia and Southern Europe. There are many ways of reducing the<br />

severity of the disease, such as rotation and the application of seed dressings and<br />

ft,;gicides, but resistant cultivars would offer by far the most effective means of<br />

control.<br />

The first resistant desi cultivar, namely, F8, was released 40 years ago in India<br />

(Luthra et al. 1941). This was followed by the release of C 12-34 in 1949 (Ahmed<br />

et al. 1949) and C 727 in 1962 (Aziz 1962) for Pakistan, and C 235 in 1962 (Bedi<br />

and Athwal 1962) for India. However, these cultivars soon became susceptible,<br />

owing to the occurrence of new races of ascochyta blight (Grewal and Vir 1974),<br />

and after 1962 there has been no report of release of a resistant desi cultivar. To<br />

the best knowledge of the authors, no resistant kabuli cultivar has ever been<br />

released for commercial production in "VAVst Asia and North Africa. As a result,<br />

only susceptible cultivars or landraces<br />

are being cultivated in an area in which<br />

ascochyta blight is endemic, restilting in instability of production.<br />

. Recently Kauser (1976) and Retig and Lehrer (1977) have reemphasized the<br />

need for the development of blight-resistant cultivars, and Haq et al. (1981) have<br />

advocated the use of mutation breeding. Several limitations such as the absence<br />

of stable sources of resistance and of effective screening techniques, combined<br />

with inability to identify physiologic races and ignorance of the genetic control of<br />

resistance, have in the past inhibited plant breeders from launching aggressive<br />

breeding programs. Singh el al. (1983) have reported several sources of resistance<br />

and an effective screening technique, and some information is available on<br />

the inheritance of resistance. The time thus seems ripe to attempt solving the<br />

blight disease problem through resistance breeding.<br />

In this paper the progress made at ICARDA through the development of<br />

blight-resistant cultivars, and the future breeding strategies for developing genet­<br />

ic material for the endemic areas of the world are discussed.<br />

Genetics of Resistance<br />

Review of Past Work<br />

In 1953, Hafiz and Ashraf reported that the resistance to ascochyta blight was<br />

determined by a single dominant gene in two parents, namely, F8 and FIO. Later<br />

Vir et al. (1975) and Eser (1976) reported a similar finding. Recently Singh and<br />

Reddy (1983) have reported that a single dominant gene conditioned resistance<br />

in four parents, ILC 72, ILC 183, ILC 200 and ICC 4935, whereas the resistance<br />

in ILC 191 was conferred by a single recessive gene. This was the first report on<br />

identification of a recessive gene governing resistance to blight. A summary of<br />

current information on inheritance of resistance is given in Tab. 1.<br />

Now that a number of resistant sources have been identified at Tel Hadya and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!