Public Workshop - Child Care - Nevada Division of Welfare ...
Public Workshop - Child Care - Nevada Division of Welfare ...
Public Workshop - Child Care - Nevada Division of Welfare ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A member <strong>of</strong> the audience asked for the timeline <strong>of</strong> parents being approved for the<br />
child care subsidy. They said they were told by worker they have 10 days to approve<br />
an application, but a parent was told differently. The issue is, can someone just tell<br />
them if contract good, pending or denied. Mr. Stagliano asked providers not to go on<br />
verbal assurances about case approvals and noted some cases in the system need<br />
secondary concurrence or may have eligibility problem. In this particular case, Mr.<br />
Stagliano asked them to please see him after the meeting.<br />
Yolanda Bunch states she has a problem with the special needs child care rate not<br />
differing from the regular child rate. She asked why it is never addressed because it<br />
needs to be changed. Mr. Stagliano said he is interested in this change and would like<br />
to give it full consideration when the next rate change is reviewed.<br />
Mr. Cooper reiterated his initial question <strong>of</strong> why parents and facilities were not notified<br />
<strong>of</strong> the move in advance and appropriate training provided. He stated the people need<br />
to know there won’t be any blockage in program benefits, there are still many<br />
unanswered questions making folks jittery about the execution <strong>of</strong> the ideas that are<br />
meant to benefit the populous. He noted if this meeting is to work to better the<br />
program, all ideas need to be followed up on. Ms. Rosaschi suggested patience when<br />
working through the issues and noted there are always contingencies staff will be<br />
unable to foresee. Another audience member reiterated the current system is not<br />
working properly, would to discuss the problems this move has made and noted the<br />
providers do not have the kind <strong>of</strong> time to wait for their payment and wait even longer<br />
for a system to be implemented. A discussion ensued regarding the system changes;<br />
the position providers are placed in by accepting subsidy children; people who need<br />
care the most getting benefits taken away when most needed; the need to provide<br />
answers to give families hope and help; and, the direction providers need to move in<br />
now. Several people vented their frustrations regarding the move from the West<br />
Washington Street location, not receiving notification about the move and asked how<br />
the <strong>Division</strong> will effectively implement the <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Advisory Board and their ideas.<br />
Mr. Gilliland said he has identified three people to begin work on the advisory board.<br />
Ms. Allard, Ms. Chappel and Ms. Rosaschi are set to begin drafting the charter for the<br />
Advisory Board to ensure there is a proper combination <strong>of</strong> people to represent all <strong>of</strong> the<br />
various community elements and people. He would like between seven and eleven<br />
people on <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Advisory Board. He expects applications for the Board to be<br />
mailed soon and hopes the Board will be meeting together by September 1, 2009. Mr.<br />
Gilliland continued stating the past <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Advisory Board was severely under<br />
represented in the south and believes their concerns were not properly addressed by<br />
the Board. In response to a question about exactly who will be on the Advisory Board,<br />
Mr. Gilliland said it is too early to decide that at this time.<br />
7