Zugang zu Pflanzengenetischen Ressourcen für die ... - Genres
Zugang zu Pflanzengenetischen Ressourcen für die ... - Genres
Zugang zu Pflanzengenetischen Ressourcen für die ... - Genres
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
Positionspapier <strong>zu</strong>m <strong>Zugang</strong> <strong>zu</strong> und <strong>zu</strong>r Weitergabe von PGRFA<br />
at ATSAF, composed of representatives from public and private research as well as NGOs and<br />
representatives from different ministries (BMZ, BML and BMU). During the second half of 1995,<br />
the working group focussed primarily on the issue of access to plant genetic resources for food<br />
and agriculture and benefit sharing. In summary, these are the major recommendations:<br />
– For the majority of plant genetic resources relevant for the food and agricultural sector the<br />
prospects for raising significant funds are very limited. With the exception of specific genetic<br />
traits, commercial demand for PGRFA will be generally low and market prices will therefore<br />
be low, too. On the other hand, most countries depend on plant genetic resources from other<br />
regions in securing their national food supply. Furthermore, the pedigrees of modern plant<br />
varieties are very complex and thus the contribution of a single genetic resource to thetotal<br />
value of the final product after some years of breeding work is difficult to estimate.<br />
– Bilateral agreements are not considered approriate for most of the plant genetic resources for<br />
food and agriculture due to the administrative burden of monitoring different materials, each<br />
covered by different terms and conditions. Bilateral agreements should be restricted to specific<br />
cases where additional benefits accrue through the use of specific genetic traits.<br />
– Therefore a multilateral system for conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources<br />
for food and agriculture is probably most appropriate, where many countries share part of the<br />
total genepool. The conservation and sustainable use of the widest possible spectrum of<br />
genetic diversity is preferable and considered the best safeguard against unknown futurerisks.<br />
– The advantages accruing from such a multilateral system are greatest when a large number of<br />
members contributes to the system. Therefore bilateral agreements should be the excep-tion<br />
and not the rule.<br />
– The proposed multilateral system builds upon the institutional approach by expanding the<br />
existing Ex-situ Network and combines it with a mechanism for benefit sharing (Verrechnungsmechanismus)<br />
which enables not only financial contributions but also contributions in<br />
kind, be it training, technologies or improved plant material.<br />
– Members of such a system would primarily be states, which would regulate the contribution<br />
of the private industry to the benefit sharing mechanism through appropriate national legislation<br />
or regulations. The system could also include independent organisations.<br />
– The members of a multilateral system will benefit in several ways:<br />
– free access to a far greater range of plant genetic resources than contributed for scientifc<br />
and breeding purposes;<br />
– access to a wider range of information, training possibilities, relevant technologies and improved<br />
materials;<br />
– better safeguarding and long term conservation through sustainable use by combiningpublic<br />
and private as well as bilateral and multilateral efforts.<br />
– The conditions for access to the system by non-members still need to be defined.<br />
In addition to these discussions about access to genetic ressources and benefit sharing, the work-