ALLBUS-Bibliographie 25. Fassung, Stand - SSOAR

228 ALLBUS-Bibliographie (25. Fassung)
Fertig, Michael und Schmidt, Christoph M., (2002). First- and Second-Generation
Migrants in Germany. What Do We Know and What Do People Think. S. 179- 218,
in: Rotte, Ralph und Stein, Petra (Hrsg.), Migration Policy and the Economy. International
Experiences. Studies and Comments (Band 1). München: Hans-Seidel-
Stiftung.
Abstract: "This paper provides a snapshot of the stock of immigrants in Germany
using the 1995 wave of the Mikrozensus, with a particular emphasis on distinguishing
first- and second-generation migrants. On the basis of this portrait, we draw attention
to the empirically most relevant groups of immigrants and review the received
literature on economic migration research in the three principal avenues of
migration research. The aspect which we concentrate on in our empirical application,
the welfare dependence of immigrants, is a matter of intense debate among economists
and policy makers. We contrast the very moderate actual public transfer payment
dependence on public assistance by Germans from various population strata.
[...] This paper [...] [uses] the detailed information available in the ALLBUS (1996)
to quantify the explanatory power of different individual variables for the perception
for foreigners in Germany."
Aufgenommen: 24. Fassung, Februar 2010
Feskens, Remco, Hox, Joop, Lensvelt-Mulders, Gerty und Schmeets, Hans, (2006).
Collecting Data among Ethnic Minorities in an international Perspective. Field Methods,
18: 284-304.
Abstract: "This article examines strategies to reduce nonresponse rates among ethnic
minorities. The authors review nonresponse rates and data collection strategies
among ethnic minorities with respect to response rates and response bias in six European
countries. The national statistical institutes of these six countries use different
definitions of ethnic minorities. This is why the definitions of ethnic minorities and
their impact on the number of members of ethnic minorities in the six countries are
compared. Nonresponse rates are usually higher among ethnic minorities than among
the native population. Dissecting the nonresponse phenomenon shows that contact
rates among ethnic minorities are lower, nonresponse due to an inability to produce
the required information is higher, and cooperation rates are higher among ethnic
minorities than among the native population. Increasing the response rates among
ethnic minorities should focus on enhancing the contact rate and reducing the number
of nonrespondents who are unable to produce the required information."
ALLBUS-Daten aus den Jahren von 1994 bis 2002 dienen den Autoren als Hauptdatensatz
für die Situation in Deutschland.
Aufgenommen: 25. Fassung, März 2011