298 94 307/02 Untersuchungen zum Stand der Umsetzung des ...
298 94 307/02 Untersuchungen zum Stand der Umsetzung des ... 298 94 307/02 Untersuchungen zum Stand der Umsetzung des ...
Teil 3 Seite 4-49 The biogas from the waste water produces more energy than the waste water treatment by anaerobic systems uses. This technice produces with one kg COD 0,5 m³ biogas with a content of CH4 of 60 % The heating value of one m³ of biogas is about 6,4 kWh. Using a block heat and power plant you can use 35 % of the 6,4 KWh in electric energy and 55 % of the 6,4 KWh in heat enery. Driving force for implementation Significant removal of the COD in waste water with an overspill of energy. Example plants At least 2 rendering plants and one slaughterhouse in Germany. Reference literature [[163, German TWG Members, 2001, 244, Germany, 2002] 4.5.3.2.2 Anaerobic treatment (AT3535005) Description Simple preceding de-nitrification without additional technical effluent measures, as a rule, leads to incomplete nitrogen elimination in terms of the effluent of the meat flour in- dustry. During preceding de-nitrification, as is well known, the de-nitrification performance asymptotically approaches a maximal attainable degree of efficiency that lies in the region of 80 to 90%, in dependence on recycling conditions (internal cycle + sludge return cycle). This may for the one part be traced back to the hydraulic details and for the other to the possibility of oxygen re-circulation in the existence of too high an internal return stream. The achievable efficiency is therefore too low for animal carcass disposal plant effluent with initial concentrations that are in part >1.000 mg/l N. There is indeed a need for a very high nitrate return flow (return flow ratio RF > 4, e.g. 30 to 50). Higher return flow ratios are possible in terms of animal carcass disposal plant effluent, due to the high load, espe- cially when a high biomass concentration with TS >10g/l can additionally be set, but the danger of the re-circulation of too much oxygen then also exists. The possibility of preceding de-nitrification does, however, exist through the successive grouping of oxic and anoxic basins, through which the effluent flows in succession (exam- ple: Plattling animal carcass disposal plant). The process variation then closely resembles a quasi-simultaneous nitrification/de-nitrification process. Preceding de-nitrification can also be implemented as pressure biology with membrane filtration or combined with a physical-chemical nitrogen elimination process. Achieved environmental benefits Cross media effects Operational data Applicability Economics
Driving force for implementation Example plants Teil 3 Seite 4-50 Corporate clarification plant of the Kraftisried animal carcass disposal plant, 87647 Unterthingau Oberding animal carcass disposal plant, Germany Corporate clarification plant of the East Bavarian Meat Flour Association,94447 Plattling This clarification plant, which originally consisted of a triple cascaded oxygen aeration plant, was expanded in 1991. At the same time, a conversion from oxygen to air was car- ried out. The biological nitrification/de-nitrification consists of a sequence of anoxic and aerobic basins in series. At the Platting animal carcass disposal plant approx. 1.660 Mg of raw material/week (animal carcasses, slaughtering waste, blood and feathers) are processed. The specific effluent volume is 1 m 3 /Mg of raw material, so that, on an average basis, an effluent vol- ume of approx. 250 m 3 /d may be expected. After the mixing and equalisation basin (720 m 3 ), the effluent reaches preceding nitrifica- tion (550 m 3 ) via a sifting and flotation plant before it is channelled into an initial nitrifica- tion stage (416 m 3 ). A further de-nitrification basin with a volume of 208 m 3 follows. The former oxygen aeration plant (1275 m 3 ) serves as a subsequent aerobic stage. For the purposes of final de-nitrification, a further small anoxic basin (25 m 3 ) follows (Figure 4-8). The VD:VBB ratio is therefore 0,35 at a total volume of VBB = 2474 m 3 . It is, however, deci- sive for the operation of the plant that the cascades of the former oxygen aeration plant can be operated differentially – anoxically or aerobically. For this purpose, the plant is regulated in accordance with the ammonia content during the first cascade process. S 50% N NK Fe MB ) Fl A DN N DN or DN DN PS 50% Q RS +Q RI Fe Fat separator DN De-nitrification MB Mixing and equalising basin N Nitrification Control S Cylindrical sieve NK Final treatment basin Fl Flotation PS Primary sludge ÜS A Anaerobic reactor Q RS +Q RI Flow of return sludge + internal cycle Excess sludge Figure 4-8 Flow diagram of the Plattling animal carcass disposal plant clarification plant ÜS
- Seite 225 und 226: 3.1.3.4 Plucking 3.1.3.5 Eviscerati
- Seite 227 und 228: Liquid phase from the dewatering (y
- Seite 229 und 230: Teil 3 Seite 4-2 - Re- use of salt
- Seite 231 und 232: [to be completed] Main achieved env
- Seite 233 und 234: Teil 3 Seite 4-6 - Efficient use an
- Seite 235 und 236: Teil 3 Seite 4-8 heat exchangers, p
- Seite 237 und 238: Teil 3 Seite 4-10 The situation wit
- Seite 239 und 240: Teil 3 Seite 4-12 rect evaporation
- Seite 241 und 242: Teil 3 Seite 4-14 Additional heat e
- Seite 243 und 244: Weight loss after 24 hours Temperat
- Seite 245 und 246: 4.2.5 Evisceration Reference to act
- Seite 247 und 248: Achieved environmental benefits Cro
- Seite 249 und 250: 4.5.1 Mechanical treatment 4.5.1.1
- Seite 251 und 252: Teil 3 Seite 4-24 Both in terms of
- Seite 253 und 254: Teil 3 Seite 4-26 4.5.2.1 Ammoniaca
- Seite 255 und 256: Teil 3 Seite 4-28 Brögbern animal
- Seite 257 und 258: Teil 3 Seite 4-30 The decision depe
- Seite 259 und 260: Teil 3 Seite 4-32 closed area can b
- Seite 261 und 262: Teil 3 Seite 4-34 coincides with th
- Seite 263 und 264: Teil 3 Seite 4-36 At a slaughterhou
- Seite 265 und 266: Age of sludge (tTS) Is this of spec
- Seite 267 und 268: Example plants Teil 3 Seite 4-40 Co
- Seite 269 und 270: BSB5 - load Bd (BSB ) NH4 -N - load
- Seite 271 und 272: Fe Fl Fe Fl P D MB Teil 3 Seite 4-4
- Seite 273 und 274: Teil 3 Seite 4-46 Parameters Unit M
- Seite 275: Teil 3 Seite 4-48 To optimise the m
- Seite 279 und 280: Teil 3 Seite 4-52 Table 4-15 Dimens
- Seite 281 und 282: Teil 3 Seite 4-54 liquid fertiliser
- Seite 283 und 284: - No cross media effects Teil 3 Sei
- Seite 285 und 286: Teil 3 Seite 4-58 3. Filtermaterial
- Seite 287 und 288: Decomposition level Measure- Teil 3
- Seite 289 und 290: Teil 3 Seite 6-2 FAT/ HEAT TRANSFER
- Seite 291 und 292: Teil 3 Seite 6-4 Clarification plan
- Seite 293 und 294: Teil 3 Seite 6-6 ENERGY FAT/ HEAT C
- Seite 295 und 296: Teil 3 Seite 6-8 ENERGY/ STEAM INPU
- Seite 297 und 298: Teil 3 Seite 6-10 water if necessar
- Seite 299 und 300: Teil 3 Seite 6-12 - In- vessel comp
- Seite 301 und 302: Teil 3 Seite 6-14 For 1000 kg of de
- Seite 303 und 304: Teil 3 Seite 6-16 Liming is usually
- Seite 305 und 306: Teil 3 Seite 6-18 ceous earth filte
- Seite 307 und 308: See description under 1 Limed bone
- Seite 309 und 310: H Concentration See description und
- Seite 311 und 312: Teil 3 Seite 6-24 The excess acid i
- Seite 313 und 314: Teil 3 Seite 7-1 7 CURRENT CONSUMPT
- Seite 315 und 316: 7.1.1 Rendering 7.1.1.1 Water Teil
- Seite 317 und 318: Teil 3 Seite 7-5 - Cleaning wastewa
- Seite 319 und 320: Teil 3 Seite 7-7 Table 7-5 shows th
- Seite 321 und 322: 7.1.2 Fat melting 7.1.3 Fish meal a
- Seite 323 und 324: Teil 3 Seite 8-1 8 TECHNIQUES TO CO
- Seite 325 und 326: Reference literature Teil 3 Seite 8
Teil 3 Seite 4-49<br />
The biogas from the waste water produces more energy than the waste water treatment<br />
by anaerobic systems uses.<br />
This technice produces with one kg COD 0,5 m³ biogas with a content of CH4 of 60 %<br />
The heating value of one m³ of biogas is about 6,4 kWh. Using a block heat and power<br />
plant you can use 35 % of the 6,4 KWh in electric energy and 55 % of the 6,4 KWh in heat<br />
enery.<br />
Driving force for implementation<br />
Significant removal of the COD in waste water with an overspill of energy.<br />
Example plants<br />
At least 2 ren<strong>der</strong>ing plants and one slaughterhouse in Germany.<br />
Reference literature<br />
[[163, German TWG Members, 2001, 244, Germany, 20<strong>02</strong>]<br />
4.5.3.2.2 Anaerobic treatment (AT3535005)<br />
Description<br />
Simple preceding de-nitrification without additional technical effluent measures, as a<br />
rule, leads to incomplete nitrogen elimination in terms of the effluent of the meat flour in-<br />
dustry. During preceding de-nitrification, as is well known, the de-nitrification performance<br />
asymptotically approaches a maximal attainable degree of efficiency that lies in the region<br />
of 80 to 90%, in dependence on recycling conditions (internal cycle + sludge return cycle).<br />
This may for the one part be traced back to the hydraulic details and for the other to the<br />
possibility of oxygen re-circulation in the existence of too high an internal return stream.<br />
The achievable efficiency is therefore too low for animal carcass disposal plant effluent<br />
with initial concentrations that are in part >1.000 mg/l N. There is indeed a need for a very<br />
high nitrate return flow (return flow ratio RF > 4, e.g. 30 to 50). Higher return flow ratios<br />
are possible in terms of animal carcass disposal plant effluent, due to the high load, espe-<br />
cially when a high biomass concentration with TS >10g/l can additionally be set, but the<br />
danger of the re-circulation of too much oxygen then also exists.<br />
The possibility of preceding de-nitrification does, however, exist through the successive<br />
grouping of oxic and anoxic basins, through which the effluent flows in succession (exam-<br />
ple: Plattling animal carcass disposal plant). The process variation then closely resembles<br />
a quasi-simultaneous nitrification/de-nitrification process. Preceding de-nitrification can<br />
also be implemented as pressure biology with membrane filtration or combined with a<br />
physical-chemical nitrogen elimination process.<br />
Achieved environmental benefits<br />
Cross media effects<br />
Operational data Applicability<br />
Economics