02.12.2012 Aufrufe

petroglyphen im valle del encanto - StoneWatch

petroglyphen im valle del encanto - StoneWatch

petroglyphen im valle del encanto - StoneWatch

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

<strong>im</strong>ental stage. In the relevant literature, the dating problem of a<br />

specific site is often s<strong>im</strong>plified to the question: who made them,<br />

Arawaks or Caribs ?<br />

COMPASS BEARING<br />

We noted down the compass bearing of engraved surfaces in<br />

214 cases, on a sixteen points scale. S<strong>im</strong>plification of these<br />

numbers to a four quadrant scale results into the following numbers:<br />

North: 60; East: 54; South: 41; West: 59. From these data<br />

it follows that Lesser Antilles petroglyphs do not show a preference<br />

for a specific orientation. This rules out the phenomenon<br />

of a <strong>del</strong>iberate and integrate East orientation, which is often reported<br />

in Petroglyph literature, where it is associated with sun<br />

worship.<br />

AVERAGE DIMENSIONS<br />

A calculation from our data stock shows that the horizontal and<br />

vertical d<strong>im</strong>ensions of an average Lesser Antilles petroglyph are<br />

23 and 26 cm. This is rather small for American Indian engravings.<br />

By way of comparison: petroglyphs in Surinam average<br />

47 x 51 cm, which means that they are four t<strong>im</strong>es as large. The<br />

small d<strong>im</strong>ensions in our area may be explained by the predominance<br />

of the S<strong>im</strong>ple Face motif.<br />

ROCK SPECIES<br />

The samples we collected from the engraved rocks were determined<br />

by Prof Dr. S.B. Kroonenberg, Wageningen University,<br />

The Netherlands. He characterized the material in general as follows,<br />

„Rather compact volcanic rocks, for the greater part lavas;<br />

some somewhat coarse grained rocks possibly from domes. The<br />

composition is intermediate (andecitic to dacitic)“.<br />

From these data it follows that the petroglyph makers in the<br />

Lesser Antilles neither chose the weakest rocks for easiest engraving,<br />

nor the hardest ones for max<strong>im</strong>al duration of the drawings,<br />

but that they picked out the more massive, non-fossile rocks.<br />

COMPARISON OF LESSER ANTILLES PETROGLYPHS<br />

WITH THE ENGRAVINGS OF THE GREATER ANTILLES<br />

Lesser and Greater Antilles petroglyphs show a number of s<strong>im</strong>ilarities<br />

which point to cultural contacts in prehistoric t<strong>im</strong>es. On<br />

the other hand, diss<strong>im</strong>ilarities exist which point to an individual<br />

character of both regions.<br />

S<strong>im</strong>ilarities:<br />

1. The typical N. E South American rock art figures mentioned<br />

in the next paragraph (curled shoulders, etc.) are absent both in<br />

the Lesser and in the Greater Antilles.<br />

2. Spirals and matchstick figures (Fig. 3) in both regions do not<br />

occupy the dominant position they have on the mainland. In the<br />

Greater Antilles they are scarce; in the Lesser Antilles they are<br />

practically absent.<br />

3. Both in the Greater and in the Lesser Antilles the majority of<br />

the drawings consists of s<strong>im</strong>ple faces (Fig. 3); in the remaining<br />

corpus, elaborate faces (Fig. 3) and complete anthropomorphs<br />

dominate. This dominating position of anthropomorphic motifs<br />

does not exist on the mainland.<br />

6<br />

Fig. 3. Some Petroglyph Motifs. 1. S<strong>im</strong>ple faces, 2. Elaborate faces, 3.<br />

Curled shoulders, 4. Double spirals, 5. Double reversed spirals, 6.<br />

Concentric circles, 7. Footsteps, 8. Suns with rays, 9. Framed crosses,<br />

10. Matchstick figures, 11. Frog men, 12. Men with concentric diamonds<br />

bodies, 13. Eye and ear in one piece, 14. Headfeet people, 15.<br />

Double ears, 16. Head on rope.<br />

Fig. 4 Ball Court Figure, Puerto Rico<br />

Diss<strong>im</strong>ilarities:<br />

1. The elaborate anthropomorphic<br />

figures on ball court slabs<br />

(Fig. 4) are specific for the<br />

Greater Antilles. Even the ball<br />

court slabs in St Croix do not<br />

have this type of human figures.<br />

2. Specific for the Greater<br />

Antilles are, next to these ball<br />

court figures: barbed faces, framed<br />

crosses, terrifying faces<br />

with bulging eyes, and rabbitlike<br />

figures with upstanding<br />

pointed ears (Fig. 6). It is striking<br />

that these motifs do not<br />

occur in the Lesser Antilles, with<br />

the exception of Grenada which<br />

has them all.<br />

This might point to a direct cultural<br />

contact between Grenada and the Greater Antilles in prehistoric<br />

t<strong>im</strong>es. However, archaeological investigations based on<br />

other prehistoric remains do not support this supposition.<br />

Fig. 6. 1. Barbed faces, 2. Terrifying faces, 3. Rabbits, 4. Faces with<br />

small circles on the contour line.<br />

3. In the Greater Antilles figures occur showing faces with small<br />

circles (four or more) on their contour line (Fig. 6). In some<br />

cases the whole outline of the face is occupied with these circles.<br />

These figures occur neither on the mainland, nor in the<br />

Lesser Antilles.

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!