Die Affäre Max Planck - Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
Teilen Einbetten Melden
ePaper herunterladen

Die Affäre Max Planck - Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Die Affäre Max Planck - Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig Die Affäre Max Planck - Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

weloennig.de
11.07.2015 Aufrufe

50Richard Conn Henry, Professor in the Henry A. Rowland Department ofPhysics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.Henry, R. C. (2005): The Mental Universe. Nature 436, 29: "The Universe is entirelymental" … "The Universe is immaterial — mental and spiritual. Live, and enjoy."Zu zahlreichen weiteren Publikationen von R.C.H. siehe http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/henryDir/publications.htmlhttp://henry.pha.jhu.edu/clearer.light.pdf und http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7047/full/436029a.htmlsowie http://en.scientificcommons.org/richard_conn_henry'Aber keine einzige wissenschaftliche Theorie nimmt auf immaterielle Faktoren Bezug.'Frank J. Tipler, seit 1987 Professor für mathematische Physik an der TulaneUniversität in New Orleans (er "arbeitete an zahlreichen Instituten, unter anderemauch mit Stephen Hawking und Roger Penrose zusammen").Tipler, F. J. (2003): Intelligent life in cosmology. International Journal of Astrobiology 2:141-148. Cambridge University Press.P. 143: Teleology has been completely rejected by evolutionary biologists. This rejection is unfortunate, because,teleology is alive and well in physics, under the name of unitarity. Unitarity is an absolutely central postulate ofquantum mechanics, and it has many consequences. One of these consequences is the CPT theorem, which impliesthat the g-factors of particles and antiparticles must be exactly equal. This equality (for electrons and positrons) hasbeen verified experimentally to 13 decimal places, the most precise experimental number we have. Which is whyvery few physicists are willing to give up the postulate of unitarity! Furthermore, unitarity is closely related to thelaw of conservation of energy, and a violation of unitarity has been shown to result usually in the gigantic creationof energy out of nothing. One model (due to Leonard Susskin) of unitarity violation had the implication thatwhenever a microwave oven was turned on, so much energy was created that the Earth was blown apart. Sophysicists are very reluctant to abandon unitarity. http://www.math.tulane.edu/~tipler/intelligentlife.pdfDer erste Satz des obigen Zitats trifft allerdings nur auf die materialistischenEvolutionsbiologen zu. Auf seine zum Teil skurrilen Beiträge wie von 2007/2008:The Physics of Christianity. Taschenbuch, Bantam Dell (Gebundene Ausgabe2007 bei Double Day Books). Deutsch (2008): Physik des Christentums: Einnaturwissenschaftliches Experiment, Piper, möchte ich an dieser Stelle nichtweiter eingehen.Empfehlenswert ist sein Buch zusammen mit John D. Barrow (1986 und1988/1996 Oxford Paperbacks): The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (736 pp.).Und zutreffend ist sein Satz: "I believe that we have to accept the implications ofphysical law, whatever these implications are. If they imply the existence of God,well then, God exists."http://wissenschafts-news.blog.de/2008/07/24/frank-j-tiplers-die-physik-des-christent-4491547/trackbacks/1/#trackbackFormhttp://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_J._TiplerUnitarity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitarity_(physics)'Aber keine einzige wissenschaftliche Theorie nimmt auf übernatürliche, immaterielle oderteleologische Faktoren Bezug.'Ein paar Gegenbeispiele aus Mathematik und Physik zur Behauptung, dasskeine einzige wissenschaftliche Theorie auf immaterielle oder teleologischeFaktoren Bezug nimmt:Granville Sewell (Professor of Mathematics University of Texas, El Paso)(2000): A Mathematician's View of Evolution. The Mathematical Intelligencer 22:5-7, Springer-Verlag. Siehe auch seinen Beitrag (2005): A Second Look at the

51Second Law auf dem Instituts-Server http://www.math.utep.edu/Faculty/sewell/articles/article.html undAppendix D: Can ANYTHING Happen in an Open System? seines Buchs TheNumerical Solution of Ordinaty and Partial Differential Equations, John Wiley &Sons (http://www.math.utep.edu/Faculty/sewell/articles/appendixd.pdf). Aus seinem Beitrag "A SecondLook..." hier nur ein kurzer Auszug (er setzt sich auch in diesem Essay für denintelligenten Ursprung des Universums und des Lebens ein):"Science has been so successful in explaining natural phenomena that the modern scientist is convinced that itcan explain everything, and anything that doesn't fit into this model is simply ignored. It doesn't matter that therewere no natural causes before Nature came into existence, so he cannot hope to ever explain the sudden creation oftime, space, matter and energy and our universe in the Big Bang. It doesn't matter that quantum mechanics is basedon a "principle of indeterminacy", that tells us that every "natural" phenomenon has a component that is foreverbeyond the ability of science to explain or predict, he still insists nothing is beyond the reach of his science. ...[Nach Hinweis auf den 2. Hauptsatz der Thermodynamik zur Wahrscheinlichkeitsfrage] But one would think thatat least this would be considered an open question, and those who argue that it [the evolution of Life] really isextremely improbable, and thus contrary to the basic principle underlying the second law, would be given ameasure of respect, and taken seriously by their colleagues, but we aren't.”Was G. Sewell's Beiträge auf dem offiziellen Server seines Instituts und seinerUniversität anlangt, so liegen hier noch einige wichtige Sperrungsaufgaben fürHerrn Kutschera und Mitarbeiter bereit, ebenso im Falle von Michael J. Behe(siehe unter http://www.lehigh.edu/~inbios/faculty/behe.html). Beim nächsten Autor, Robert J. MarksII, haben das allerdings schon andere für sie besorgt.Robert J. Marks II (Distinguished Professor of Electrical and ComputerEngineering, Baylor University) und William A. Dembski (Research Professor inPhilosophy, Southwestern Seminary) vom Evolutionary Informatics Labhttp://www.evoinfo.org/: Ankündigung 20 January 2009: Two forthcoming peer-reviewedpro-ID articles in the math/eng literature:William A. Dembski and Robert J. Marks II (2009): Conservation ofInformation in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success (in press).Abstract: Conservation of information theorems indicate that any search algorithm performs on average as wellas random search without replacement unless it takes advantage of problem-specific information about the searchtarget or the search-space structure. Combinatorics shows that even a moderately sized search requires problemspecificinformation to be successful. Three measures to characterize the information required for successful searchare (1) endogenous information, which measures the difficulty of finding a target using random search; (2)exogenous information, which measures the difficulty that remains in finding a target once a search takesadvantage of problem-specific information; and (3) active information, which, as the difference betweenendogenous and exogenous information, measures the contribution of problem-specific information forsuccessfully finding a target. This paper develops a methodology based on these information measures to gauge theeffectiveness with which problem-specific information facilitates successful search. It then applies thismethodology to various search tools widely used in evolutionary search.(P. 1 of pdf draft:) "Such [novel] information does not magically materialize but instead results from the action ofthe programmer who prescribes how knowledge about the problem gets folded into the search algorithm.”William A. Dembski and Robert J. Marks II (2009): The Search for aSearch: Measuring the Information Cost of Higher Level Search (in press).Abstract: Many searches are needle-in-the-haystack problems, looking for small targets in large spaces. In suchcases, blind search can stand no hope of success. Success, instead, requires an assisted search. But whence theassistance required for a search to be successful? To pose the question this way suggests that successful searchesdo not emerge spontaneously but need themselves to be discovered via a search. The question then naturally ariseswhether such a higher-level "search for a search” is any easier than the original search. We prove two results: (1)The Horizontal No Free Lunch Theorem, which shows that average relative performance of searches never exceeds

50Richard Conn Henry, Professor in the Henry A. Rowland Department ofPhysics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.Henry, R. C. (2005): The Mental Universe. Nature 436, 29: "The Universe is entirelymental" … "The Universe is immaterial — mental and spiritual. Live, and enjoy."Zu zahlreichen weiteren Publikationen von R.C.H. siehe http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/henryDir/publications.htmlhttp://henry.pha.jhu.edu/clearer.light.pdf und http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7047/full/436029a.htmlsowie http://en.scientificcommons.org/richard_conn_henry'Aber keine einzige wissenschaftliche Theorie nimmt auf immaterielle Faktoren Bezug.'Frank J. Tipler, seit 1987 Professor für mathematische Physik an der TulaneUniversität in New Orleans (er "arbeitete an zahlreichen Instituten, unter anderemauch mit Stephen Hawking und Roger Penrose zusammen").Tipler, F. J. (2003): Intelligent life in cosmology. International Journal of Astrobiology 2:141-148. Cambridge University Press.P. 143: Teleology has been completely rejected by evolutionary biologists. This rejection is unfortunate, because,teleology is alive and well in physics, under the name of unitarity. Unitarity is an absolutely central postulate ofquantum mechanics, and it has many consequences. One of these consequences is the CPT theorem, which impliesthat the g-factors of particles and antiparticles must be exactly equal. This equality (for electrons and positrons) hasbeen verified experimentally to 13 decimal places, the most precise experimental number we have. Which is whyvery few physicists are willing to give up the postulate of unitarity! Furthermore, unitarity is closely related to thelaw of conservation of energy, and a violation of unitarity has been shown to result usually in the gigantic creationof energy out of nothing. One model (due to Leonard Susskin) of unitarity violation had the implication thatwhenever a microwave oven was turned on, so much energy was created that the Earth was blown apart. Sophysicists are very reluctant to abandon unitarity. http://www.math.tulane.edu/~tipler/intelligentlife.pdfDer erste Satz des obigen Zitats trifft allerdings nur auf die materialistischenEvolutionsbiologen zu. Auf seine zum Teil skurrilen Beiträge wie von 2007/2008:The Physics of Christianity. Taschenbuch, Bantam Dell (Gebundene Ausgabe2007 bei Double Day Books). Deutsch (2008): Physik des Christentums: Einnaturwissenschaftliches Experiment, Piper, möchte ich an dieser Stelle nichtweiter eingehen.Empfehlenswert ist sein Buch zusammen mit John D. Barrow (1986 und1988/1996 Oxford Paperbacks): The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (736 pp.).Und zutreffend ist sein Satz: "I believe that we have to accept the implications ofphysical law, whatever these implications are. If they imply the existence of God,well then, God exists."http://wissenschafts-news.blog.de/2008/07/24/frank-j-tiplers-die-physik-des-christent-4491547/trackbacks/1/#trackbackFormhttp://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_J._TiplerUnitarity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitarity_(physics)'Aber keine einzige wissenschaftliche Theorie nimmt auf übernatürliche, immaterielle oderteleologische Faktoren Bezug.'Ein paar Gegenbeispiele aus Mathematik und Physik zur Behauptung, dasskeine einzige wissenschaftliche Theorie auf immaterielle oder teleologischeFaktoren Bezug nimmt:Granville Sewell (Professor of Mathematics University of Texas, El Paso)(2000): A Mathematician's View of Evolution. The Mathematical Intelligencer 22:5-7, Springer-Verlag. Siehe auch seinen Beitrag (2005): A Second Look at the

logo

Produkte

Ressourcen

Unternehmen

AGB
Datenschutzerklärung
Cookie-Richtlinien
Cookie-Einstellungen
Impressum
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!