Auszug aus „On the Principles“ von David RicardoEs ist kaum zu glauben, wie schwachsinnig die Argumente eines so gerühmten Ökonomenzu dem wichtigen Thema der Absatzkrisen waren.Hier ein längeres Zitat von David Ricardo als Beispiel:M. Say has, however, most satisfactorily shewn, that there is no amount of capitalwhich may not be employed in a country, because demand is only limited byproduction. No man produces, but with a view to consume or sell, and he never sells,but with an intention to purchase some other commodity, which may be immediatelyuseful to him, or which may contribute to future production. By producing, then, henecessarily becomes either the consumer of his own goods, or the purchaser andconsumer of the goods of some other person. It is not to be supposed that heshould, for any length of time, be ill-informed of the commodities which he can mostadvantageously produce, to attain the object which he has in view, namely, thepossession of other goods; and, therefore, it is not probable that he will continuallyproduce a commodity for which there is no demand.There cannot, then, be accumulated in a country any amount of capital which cannotbe employed productively, until wages rise so high in consequence of the rise ofnecessaries, and so little consequently remains for the profits of stock, that themotive for accumulation ceases. While the profits of stock are high, men will have amotive to accumulate. Whilst a man has any wished-for gratification unsupplied, hewill have a demand for more commodities; and it will be an effectual demand whilehe has any new value to offer in exchange for them. If ten thousand pounds weregiven to a man having £100,000 per annum, he would not lock it up in a chest, butwould either increase his expenses by £10,000; employ it himself productively, orlend it to some other person for that purpose; in either case, demand would beincreased, although it would be for different objects. If he increased his expenses,his effectual demand might probably be for buildings, furniture, or some suchenjoyment. If he employed his £10,000 productively, his effectual demand would befor food, clothing, and raw material, which might set new labourers to work; but stillit would be demand.Productions are always bought by productions, or by services; money is only themedium by which the exchange is effected. Too much of a particular commodity maybe produced, of which there may be such a glut in the market, as not to repay thecapital expended on it; but this cannot be the case with respect to all commodities;the demand for corn is limited by the mouths which are to eat it, for shoes and coats28
y the persons who are to wear them; but though a community, or a part of acommunity, may have as much corn, and as many hats and shoes, as it is able ormay wish to consume, the same cannot be said of every commodity produced bynature or by art. Some would consume more wine, if they had the ability to procureit. Others having enough of wine, would wish to increase the quantity or improve thequality of their furniture. Others might wish to ornament their grounds, or to enlargetheir houses. The wish to do all or some of these is implanted in every man's breast;nothing is required but the means, and nothing can afford the means, but anincrease of production. If I had food and necessaries at my disposal, I should not belong in want of workmen who would put me in possession of some of the objectsmost useful or most desirable to me.David Ricardo, On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, chap. 21.2-21.3(1)Ich denke, Argumente gegen diese dreisten Behauptungen wider besseren Wissens sindvöllig überflüssig. Dass solche Thesen von der VWL gestützt werden, indem man das Geldbis heute in den neoklassischen Modellen unwidersprochen nur als Geldschleier und alsTauschmittel ohne Einfluss auf die Realwirtschaft behandelt, ist ein Skandal. JederProfessor redet sich selbstverständlich damit heraus, dass er ja nur die neoklassischenModelle lehre und dass diese eben von Say, Ricardo und Mill beeinflusst seien und in diesenModellen gilt das Geld als neutral.Zumindest müssten die Studenten darüber aufgeklärt werden, welche falschenVorstellungen mit diesen Modellen verbreitet werden und dass diese Modelle für die Realitätvöllig unbrauchbar und eine gezielte Irreführung des Publikums sind. Stattdessen werdendie Studenten mit den kompliziertesten mathematischen Kurvendiskussionen nochgezwungen, im Sinn dieser Modelle zu denken und zu argumentieren und diese Modellesogar für passend und zutreffend zu halten.(1) http://www.econlib.org/library/Ricardo/ricP5.html#Ch.21,%20Profits%20and%20InterestDas Say'sche Theorem in der aktuellen VWLUlrich van Suntum(1) schreibt in seinem Lehrbuch zur VWL:29