Download - Fachgebietes Ökonomie des Planens und Bauens ...

Summary
13
To sum up, urban regeneration with the help of “Sanierungsmaßnahmen”
is by no means outdated. In
cities, there is a permanent need for regenerating and
upgrading areas with concentrations of urban deficits.
Depending on the local situation, they will have to take
the form of a long-term maintenance of the building
stock and public spaces, handling of new urban deficits
and supporting the creation of new inner-city housing
options.
Recommendations for the future of urban regeneration
are related to a simplification of complicated
procedures when it comes to terminating the formal
regeneration procedure and the management of the
differentiated family of funding programs. In times
of possibly shrinking budgets for urban regeneration,
the consistent integration into urban development
strategies, the creation of global development budgets,
powerful, quick and flexible granting bureaucracies,
the stabilization of participatory approaches, the organization
of professional exchange and the introduction
of more systematic evaluation and monitoring following
successful examples introduced by the funding
program “Socially Integrative City” are advisable. The
latter ought to be neighbourhood-focused, related to
transparent success indicators, be sensitive for followup
costs and effects of urban regeneration, check the
willingness to cooperate by important local stakeholders
and monitor the investment climate. The study
has made clear that there are some strong reasons for
relatively slow regeneration procedures. The funding
system can react to them in various ways, for instance
by going for an early agreement about the intensity
of regeneration and funding, the establishment of
additional incentives for a speedy termination linked
to instruments for maintenance and aftercare. In the
future, funding ought to continue rewarding especially
innovations contributions to compact development.
Langzeitwirkungen und Effektivierung der Städtebauförderung