Silber spiegel - SwissEduc
Silber spiegel - SwissEduc
Silber spiegel - SwissEduc
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
40<br />
3/04<br />
Mechanisms<br />
A good approach to a mechanism problem, for undergraduate<br />
students, is running a Gaussian calculation to obtain results that<br />
can be compared with experimental results. When a discrepancy<br />
appears in output data, the student must be able to criticize that<br />
result by analyzing what was ignored when initial conditions<br />
were input.<br />
Salgado et al.[2, 3] established an experiment designed to help<br />
develop scientifi c research abilities in undergraduates students.<br />
This experiment requires the determination of an hypothesis<br />
for explaining the maleic–fumaric isomerization by means of a<br />
plausible mechanism. It included spectroscopic data.<br />
We now propose to extend<br />
an examination of this mechanism-based<br />
experiment<br />
to include Gaussian 98<br />
calculations. Students examine<br />
three mechanisms and<br />
choose one.<br />
Figure 1:<br />
Figure 1:<br />
Maleic–Fumaric<br />
isomerization.<br />
Students should decide which is the plausible mechanism. Moreover they<br />
should assess the calculation process itself. Solvent effects are not considered in<br />
this theoretical study, which leads to high values in intrinsic activation barriers.<br />
Hence, the theoretical study describes a process carried out in gas phase and<br />
not in solution phase.<br />
Finally, students should choose the correct mechanism by<br />
recognizing the mechanism with more elementary steps. The<br />
second mechanism has more elementary steps and its activation<br />
energies are smaller than the alternatives.<br />
© c+b 3/04