Information Governance - Project Consult Unternehmensberatung ...
Information Governance - Project Consult Unternehmensberatung ... Information Governance - Project Consult Unternehmensberatung ...
The end of Records and Archives Management as we know it 6 Accountability The inability to resolve traditional accountability of information with the digital world and really, to even imagine how the two are even related belies the only truth: we can never really account for most events around BD. First, the basis of accountability begins with the understanding that archival value is a function of documents as evidence. This makes sense when we take into account that archivists in the Court are traditionally keepers of judicial documents. As keepers of evidence, trust is a value of paramount importance to archivists and all of the archival methodology is geared towards making sure that the documents in custody remain trustworthy accounts of past events. Driven mainly by technology, uncertainty has recently been growing exponentially. Interconnections have brought new degrees of freedom/dimensions to digital transactions, and all of these at speeds we have never seen before. Accountability has traditionally been seen to be working in the opposite direction, adding uncertainty to outcomes and often reducing speeds. It seems to be losing the battle in my view. In Internal Judicial archivists no longer serve the records creator alone, but are accountable to the society as a whole. There is also a shift from micro to macro-appraisal starting by looking at the organizational structure of a records creator, determine which tasks performed by this organization are relevant and then determine the informational and evidential value of the documents created in the course of the performance of these tasks.
The end of Records and Archives Management as we know it 7 The professional becomes part of the data-information system The notion of the archivist becoming a part of the data-information system as seen in the Court is not fundamentally new. In our organization, the archivist is no longer external and neutral, but through the act of ingestion and dissemination becomes a part of the information ecosystem. It also has huge implications on the role of the new archivist in the BD world. Bohm (2003) stated that there is very little separation between the observer and the observed. He stated, “…the observed is profoundly affected by the observer, and the observer by the observed – they really are one cycle, one process” (p. 70). Since the BD object being examined and the measuring apparatus cannot be isolated from each other in an unambiguous way while interaction is taking place, the system that is being investigated cannot be considered as being closed. Even the archivist as an extension of the measuring apparatus cannot be isolated from the situation. It is for this reason that the classical appraisal process is not definitive for BD in the context of the Court. One conclusion from this is that BD information is a multi-faceted concept that changes its properties, and hence its definition, according to different unique perspectives. Or, in other words, the archivist becomes part of the archived. It is rather perplexing to discover that this is the very definition we in vain, desire to run away from “falling down, waking up and running some more”. In other words, the “former”, that is he who gives shape, becomes part of the form, hence “in form”.
- Seite 261 und 262: Archivierung von Web Applikationen
- Seite 263 und 264: © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensbera
- Seite 265 und 266: Anfang & Ende von Aufbewahrungsfris
- Seite 267 und 268: Anfang & Ende von Aufbewahrungsfris
- Seite 269 und 270: Studie zu Aufbewahrungsfristen Iron
- Seite 271 und 272: Übersicht generelle & handelsrecht
- Seite 273 und 274: Übersicht HR-Unterlagen 10
- Seite 275 und 276: Übersicht Umweltschutz Unterlagen
- Seite 277 und 278: Übersicht „Legal“ & andere Unt
- Seite 279 und 280: Mehrdimensionalität der Bewertung
- Seite 281 und 282: Studie zu Aufbewahrungsfristen Iron
- Seite 283 und 284: Übersicht Buchahltungs- und steuer
- Seite 285 und 286: Übersicht HR-Unterlagen 22
- Seite 287 und 288: Übersicht Transport Unterlagen 24
- Seite 289 und 290: Übersicht Umwelt (2) 26
- Seite 291 und 292: Übersicht Versicherungen, Marketin
- Seite 293 und 294: JStG 2013 © PROJECT CONSULT Untern
- Seite 295 und 296: GoBD: Ziele © PROJECT CONSULT Unte
- Seite 297 und 298: GoBD: Regelungsbereiche © PROJECT
- Seite 299 und 300: GoBD: Regelungsbereiche © PROJECT
- Seite 301 und 302: GoBD: Regelungsbereiche © PROJECT
- Seite 303 und 304: Governance, Risk Management & Compl
- Seite 305 und 306: © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensbera
- Seite 307 und 308: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 309 und 310: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 311: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 315 und 316: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 317 und 318: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 319 und 320: HP Information Governance Marcel Wi
- Seite 321 und 322: Information governance framework Ac
- Seite 323 und 324: Records Management Governance Use C
- Seite 325 und 326: Thank You © Copyright 2012 Hewlett
- Seite 327 und 328: © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensbera
- Seite 329 und 330: Frage 2 Ist Information Governance
- Seite 331 und 332: Frage 4 Stellenwert technischer Inf
- Seite 333 und 334: Frage 6 Umsetzung von Information G
- Seite 335 und 336: Bewertung - Ihre Meinung ist uns wi
- Seite 337 und 338: Information Governance Grundsätze,
- Seite 339 und 340: Information Governance Grundsätze,
- Seite 341 und 342: Information Governance Grundsätze,
- Seite 343 und 344: Unternehmensprofil Die PROJECT CONS
- Seite 345 und 346: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 347 und 348: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 349 und 350: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 351 und 352: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 353 und 354: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 355 und 356: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 357 und 358: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 359 und 360: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 361 und 362: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
The end of Records and Archives Management as we know it<br />
7<br />
The professional becomes part of the data-information system<br />
The notion of the archivist becoming a part of the data-information system as seen in<br />
the Court is not fundamentally new. In our organization, the archivist is no longer external and<br />
neutral, but through the act of ingestion and dissemination becomes a part of the information<br />
ecosystem. It also has huge implications on the role of the new archivist in the BD world.<br />
Bohm (2003) stated that there is very little separation between the observer and the<br />
observed. He stated, “…the observed is profoundly affected by the observer, and the observer<br />
by the observed – they really are one cycle, one process” (p. 70).<br />
Since the BD object being examined and the measuring apparatus cannot be isolated<br />
from each other in an unambiguous way while interaction is taking place, the system that is<br />
being investigated cannot be considered as being closed. Even the archivist as an extension of<br />
the measuring apparatus cannot be isolated from the situation. It is for this reason that the<br />
classical appraisal process is not definitive for BD in the context of the Court.<br />
One conclusion from this is that BD information is a multi-faceted concept that changes<br />
its properties, and hence its definition, according to different unique perspectives. Or, in other<br />
words, the archivist becomes part of the archived. It is rather perplexing to discover that this is<br />
the very definition we in vain, desire to run away from “falling down, waking up and running<br />
some more”. In other words, the “former”, that is he who gives shape, becomes part of the<br />
form, hence “in form”.