Information Governance - Project Consult Unternehmensberatung ...
Information Governance - Project Consult Unternehmensberatung ... Information Governance - Project Consult Unternehmensberatung ...
The end of Records and Archives Management as we know it 4 Born Digital Digital archiving, a term developed in the advent of information technology evolved from the traditional archiving seeking to preserve data in its smallest unit. Within the Court digital archive term is used to refer to everything currently existing in digital format anywhere and their subsets, typically discrete collection of related digital documents. The archival discipline consists in building knowledge about archival documents and acting upon them in methodical ways to protect the properties that they have. Thus, the large theoretical question in the case of digital objects in the Court is what are those properties that need to be protected, and why. The matter at hand, the thing being done, produces the document, which then stands as a vehicle or device to access the fact and act. Documents of this type are thus regarded as having what the Court staff call full faith or public faith or, as professionals would say, as possessing trustworthiness as evidence of fact and act-if they are preserved in the place the Court has appointed and according to fixed and well understood administrative procedures. From this basis, the discipline of the archivist as keeper of the records has grown. The Court has to employ other methods to ensure wide access and long-term preservation of digital data.
The end of Records and Archives Management as we know it 5 Value There are two strands of theory that the Court uses to guide its practice. One is archival theory and the other is appraisal theory. Archival theory is the older of the two, originating in the role of archivists as keeper of records. The appraisal theory prescribes to archivists nowadays also taking upon themselves to answer the question what should be preserved. In the case of analog or non-digital materials, artifacts are deemed to have singular research or archival value if they retain qualities and characteristics that make them the only satisfactory form for long-term preservation. These qualities and characteristics are commonly referred to as the item’s intrinsic value and form the foundation upon which digital artifactual value is currently assessed. In the born-digital world of the Court, data interferes with each other when presented with multiple flows, and any measurement of its archival value forces decomposition to bytes of data or footprints that are difficult to assess. One problem at the start of the valuation for archiving occurs when the DA is presented with a large set of information from the field, and he or she has to make sense of it. In the born-digital world however, seeking to measure archival value fundamentally alters the properties of the data one is studying. The result is that identifying data that can be safely disposed is just as difficult as identifying data of archival value.
- Seite 259 und 260: Die qumram Web Information Governan
- Seite 261 und 262: Archivierung von Web Applikationen
- Seite 263 und 264: © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensbera
- Seite 265 und 266: Anfang & Ende von Aufbewahrungsfris
- Seite 267 und 268: Anfang & Ende von Aufbewahrungsfris
- Seite 269 und 270: Studie zu Aufbewahrungsfristen Iron
- Seite 271 und 272: Übersicht generelle & handelsrecht
- Seite 273 und 274: Übersicht HR-Unterlagen 10
- Seite 275 und 276: Übersicht Umweltschutz Unterlagen
- Seite 277 und 278: Übersicht „Legal“ & andere Unt
- Seite 279 und 280: Mehrdimensionalität der Bewertung
- Seite 281 und 282: Studie zu Aufbewahrungsfristen Iron
- Seite 283 und 284: Übersicht Buchahltungs- und steuer
- Seite 285 und 286: Übersicht HR-Unterlagen 22
- Seite 287 und 288: Übersicht Transport Unterlagen 24
- Seite 289 und 290: Übersicht Umwelt (2) 26
- Seite 291 und 292: Übersicht Versicherungen, Marketin
- Seite 293 und 294: JStG 2013 © PROJECT CONSULT Untern
- Seite 295 und 296: GoBD: Ziele © PROJECT CONSULT Unte
- Seite 297 und 298: GoBD: Regelungsbereiche © PROJECT
- Seite 299 und 300: GoBD: Regelungsbereiche © PROJECT
- Seite 301 und 302: GoBD: Regelungsbereiche © PROJECT
- Seite 303 und 304: Governance, Risk Management & Compl
- Seite 305 und 306: © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensbera
- Seite 307 und 308: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 309: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 313 und 314: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 315 und 316: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 317 und 318: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 319 und 320: HP Information Governance Marcel Wi
- Seite 321 und 322: Information governance framework Ac
- Seite 323 und 324: Records Management Governance Use C
- Seite 325 und 326: Thank You © Copyright 2012 Hewlett
- Seite 327 und 328: © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensbera
- Seite 329 und 330: Frage 2 Ist Information Governance
- Seite 331 und 332: Frage 4 Stellenwert technischer Inf
- Seite 333 und 334: Frage 6 Umsetzung von Information G
- Seite 335 und 336: Bewertung - Ihre Meinung ist uns wi
- Seite 337 und 338: Information Governance Grundsätze,
- Seite 339 und 340: Information Governance Grundsätze,
- Seite 341 und 342: Information Governance Grundsätze,
- Seite 343 und 344: Unternehmensprofil Die PROJECT CONS
- Seite 345 und 346: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 347 und 348: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 349 und 350: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 351 und 352: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 353 und 354: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 355 und 356: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 357 und 358: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 359 und 360: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
The end of Records and Archives Management as we know it<br />
4<br />
Born Digital<br />
Digital archiving, a term developed in the advent of information technology evolved<br />
from the traditional archiving seeking to preserve data in its smallest unit. Within the Court<br />
digital archive term is used to refer to everything currently existing in digital format anywhere<br />
and their subsets, typically discrete collection of related digital documents.<br />
The archival discipline consists in building knowledge about archival documents and<br />
acting upon them in methodical ways to protect the properties that they have. Thus, the large<br />
theoretical question in the case of digital objects in the Court is what are those properties that<br />
need to be protected, and why.<br />
The matter at hand, the thing being done, produces the document, which then stands as<br />
a vehicle or device to access the fact and act. Documents of this type are thus regarded as<br />
having what the Court staff call full faith or public faith or, as professionals would say, as<br />
possessing trustworthiness as evidence of fact and act-if they are preserved in the place the<br />
Court has appointed and according to fixed and well understood administrative procedures.<br />
From this basis, the discipline of the archivist as keeper of the records has grown.<br />
The Court has to employ other methods to ensure wide access and long-term<br />
preservation of digital data.