Information Governance - Project Consult Unternehmensberatung ...
Information Governance - Project Consult Unternehmensberatung ... Information Governance - Project Consult Unternehmensberatung ...
The end of Records and Archives Management as we know it 2 Introduction Currently, 122 states are states parties to the Statute of the Court, including all of South America, nearly all of Europe, most of Oceania and roughly half the countries in Africa. A further 31 countries including Russia, have signed but not ratified the Rome Statute. The International Criminal Court’s archives document its investigations, indictments and court proceedings, their work relating to the detention of accused persons, the protection of witnesses, victims participation and enforcement of sentences, and their relationships with States, other law enforcement authorities, international and non-governmental organizations and the general public. Information flowing through the Courts is now more correlated than ever and found in large quantities known as ‘big data’; it is pervasive, difficult to capture, store or analyze. In this paper, the International Criminal Court (ICC), a judicial organization that has the preservation of its information as a critical aspect of its judicial obligation is referred to contextually. Born in the digital age the Court has adopted an eCourt strategy covering all aspects of its operations. And to solve the accountability challenge its records and archives functions are redefined towards information orchestration and less towards traditional preservation.
The end of Records and Archives Management as we know it 3 The Big Picture This paper may not necessarily change your life but could point to a different way of looking at the changing role of an archivist. In this discussion I shall focus mainly on the role of the digital archivist in a born-digital (BD) environment from my experience from years of working in International Criminal Law area. The most common being an archive is a repository of documents and materials of importance to the public. A scholar Alan Liu shared his thoughts of an archive being a term that is used when one cannot grasp the nature of the holds. For an archive to remain relevant its repositories must have holds of value to the public. Therefore the relevancy of the Court’s archive lies in its ability to act as an instrument of accountability for the states and public. Digital archivists (DA) in the international judicial sector often work in small teams, and are required to make sense out of large data sets that come from all around the world and in different formats, and are often of varying quality and reliability. For the DA peering through the tiny viewport of his or her computer display to this very large data space is like a person peering through the keyhole of a door to an enormous hall. To gain a sense of what the hall is like, the DA must piece together his or her different views from understanding and experience, which can lead to many problems associated with trust, accountability and ethics.
- Seite 257 und 258: Ausblick 2014 - Willkommen in der W
- Seite 259 und 260: Die qumram Web Information Governan
- Seite 261 und 262: Archivierung von Web Applikationen
- Seite 263 und 264: © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensbera
- Seite 265 und 266: Anfang & Ende von Aufbewahrungsfris
- Seite 267 und 268: Anfang & Ende von Aufbewahrungsfris
- Seite 269 und 270: Studie zu Aufbewahrungsfristen Iron
- Seite 271 und 272: Übersicht generelle & handelsrecht
- Seite 273 und 274: Übersicht HR-Unterlagen 10
- Seite 275 und 276: Übersicht Umweltschutz Unterlagen
- Seite 277 und 278: Übersicht „Legal“ & andere Unt
- Seite 279 und 280: Mehrdimensionalität der Bewertung
- Seite 281 und 282: Studie zu Aufbewahrungsfristen Iron
- Seite 283 und 284: Übersicht Buchahltungs- und steuer
- Seite 285 und 286: Übersicht HR-Unterlagen 22
- Seite 287 und 288: Übersicht Transport Unterlagen 24
- Seite 289 und 290: Übersicht Umwelt (2) 26
- Seite 291 und 292: Übersicht Versicherungen, Marketin
- Seite 293 und 294: JStG 2013 © PROJECT CONSULT Untern
- Seite 295 und 296: GoBD: Ziele © PROJECT CONSULT Unte
- Seite 297 und 298: GoBD: Regelungsbereiche © PROJECT
- Seite 299 und 300: GoBD: Regelungsbereiche © PROJECT
- Seite 301 und 302: GoBD: Regelungsbereiche © PROJECT
- Seite 303 und 304: Governance, Risk Management & Compl
- Seite 305 und 306: © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensbera
- Seite 307: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 311 und 312: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 313 und 314: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 315 und 316: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 317 und 318: The end of Records and Archives Man
- Seite 319 und 320: HP Information Governance Marcel Wi
- Seite 321 und 322: Information governance framework Ac
- Seite 323 und 324: Records Management Governance Use C
- Seite 325 und 326: Thank You © Copyright 2012 Hewlett
- Seite 327 und 328: © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensbera
- Seite 329 und 330: Frage 2 Ist Information Governance
- Seite 331 und 332: Frage 4 Stellenwert technischer Inf
- Seite 333 und 334: Frage 6 Umsetzung von Information G
- Seite 335 und 336: Bewertung - Ihre Meinung ist uns wi
- Seite 337 und 338: Information Governance Grundsätze,
- Seite 339 und 340: Information Governance Grundsätze,
- Seite 341 und 342: Information Governance Grundsätze,
- Seite 343 und 344: Unternehmensprofil Die PROJECT CONS
- Seite 345 und 346: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 347 und 348: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 349 und 350: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 351 und 352: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 353 und 354: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 355 und 356: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
- Seite 357 und 358: Unternehmensprofil PROJECT CONSULT
The end of Records and Archives Management as we know it<br />
2<br />
Introduction<br />
Currently, 122 states are states parties to the Statute of the Court, including all of South<br />
America, nearly all of Europe, most of Oceania and roughly half the countries in Africa. A<br />
further 31 countries including Russia, have signed but not ratified the Rome Statute.<br />
The International Criminal Court’s archives document its investigations, indictments and<br />
court proceedings, their work relating to the detention of accused persons, the protection of<br />
witnesses, victims participation and enforcement of sentences, and their relationships with<br />
States, other law enforcement authorities, international and non-governmental organizations<br />
and the general public.<br />
<strong>Information</strong> flowing through the Courts is now more correlated than ever and found in<br />
large quantities known as ‘big data’; it is pervasive, difficult to capture, store or analyze. In this<br />
paper, the International Criminal Court (ICC), a judicial organization that has the preservation of<br />
its information as a critical aspect of its judicial obligation is referred to contextually. Born in<br />
the digital age the Court has adopted an eCourt strategy covering all aspects of its operations.<br />
And to solve the accountability challenge its records and archives functions are redefined<br />
towards information orchestration and less towards traditional preservation.