16.07.2014 Aufrufe

Heilpädagogik online - sonderpaedagoge.de!

Heilpädagogik online - sonderpaedagoge.de!

Heilpädagogik online - sonderpaedagoge.de!

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

American Pragmatism, Sociology and the Development of Disability Studies<br />

information and competing communities of discourse. RORTY<br />

(1979; 1991) is an example of these positions. He dismisses claims<br />

to objectivity as wishful thinking, arguing that our standards of<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nce and our scientific and social policy practices are cultural<br />

conventions. RORTY has been a powerful influence on cultural<br />

studies, including disability studies, in so far as he stresses the<br />

importance of engaging in conversation about issues and analyzing<br />

texts in a open discourse taking into account the subjective<br />

differences and cultural grounding of the participants. This<br />

perspective in social science and the humanities highlights the<br />

reading of situations and texts and analysis of both the observer/rea<strong>de</strong>r<br />

and that which is observed or is the text. RORTY’s<br />

brand of positivism also emphasizes cultural and historical context.<br />

This approach to un<strong>de</strong>rstanding raises important questions such<br />

as: Who has the right to speak and interpret? What constitutes a<br />

community of discourse or a community of scholars? What are the<br />

criteria of admission to such communities? How is an argument<br />

comprised and evi<strong>de</strong>nce presented that would convince others of<br />

its truth and usefulness? How does cultural context and history<br />

affect the <strong>de</strong>finition of the situation and how the “facts are<br />

interpreted? How is evi<strong>de</strong>nce, theory and argument translated into<br />

social policies that have the power the change the behavior of<br />

others, rearrange status hierarchies and the structure of institutions?<br />

In reviewing this broad range of pragmatic positions and<br />

their use, it is noteworthy that there are not merely different but<br />

radically opposed forms of pragmatism. However, they do address<br />

many of the same fundamental questions of how we acquire and<br />

use knowledge and they share the important principle that<br />

knowledge ought to be evaluated in terms of its utility and the<br />

consequences of its application to practical problems.<br />

- 29 -<br />

Heilpädagogik <strong>online</strong> 03/ 03

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!