05.11.2013 Aufrufe

Technische Universität Berlin - kd-visions

Technische Universität Berlin - kd-visions

Technische Universität Berlin - kd-visions

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

6. Closing Words<br />

6.1 Retrospection<br />

This work dealt with the topic of roundabouts in the focus, specifically randabouts as a traffic<br />

planning instrument from a landscape architectual point of view. The fundamental motivation<br />

for this study was a discourse which led to the remark that while roundabouts have<br />

recieved a lot of traffic planning euphoria in the last decade, landscape architectual design<br />

benefits have not recieved the same amount of positive feedback. At this point in time the<br />

majority of these areas are still not designed to satisfaction.<br />

According to this remark several questions evolved which went beyond the boundaries of<br />

landsacape architecture. Essential questions like: „What is the definition of the term roundabout?“;<br />

„Which types of roundabouts can be distinguished?“; and more specific questions<br />

such as: „What is a location/ non-location?“, and „How can roundabouts be easier/ better<br />

organized in the future?“. To answer these questions it was essential to undertake a multidisciplined<br />

analysis.<br />

The primary question was how to treat the topic in a way that considers all discplines together<br />

in one piece of work.<br />

Based on this objective, a classification was made which seperated the work into three thematic<br />

parts: traffic planning, sociological considerations, and landscape architectural aspects.<br />

To meet this objective literature reviews, inquiries to persons or bodys in charge of traffic<br />

planning, evaluations of photo databases, and on-site reviews of roundabouts were used to<br />

do a complete and comprehensive assessment.<br />

6.2 Findings<br />

First of all, it is to be held that all planned processing steps have been carried out successfully.<br />

The only exception ist that the initial objective of the typology key could not be realised<br />

sensibly and therefore, was adapted over the course of the work.<br />

The focus of the second chapter was on traffic planning aspects, more specifically to reduce<br />

the complicated and extensive process of intersection design into a substantially more clear<br />

and simple process. Especially for the characteristic of the intersection type roundabout,<br />

definition, design and decision steps were developed which provide quick on demand access<br />

to the desired information. Finalizing the chapter, a legal framework for accessible center<br />

islands of roundabouts has been presented and interpreted for the first time. This includes a<br />

comprehensive overview and discussion of possible crossing facilities for the opening of the<br />

central islands.<br />

The focus of the third chapter was on the sociological aspects of roundabouts, most specifically<br />

the sociological considerations of the movement and perception by individuals of a<br />

roundabout. This chapter successfull addresses the central issues: „How do individuals<br />

move in a roundabout?“ and “Roundabout - location or non-location? “; and “ Wh people<br />

use certain spaces and avoid others?<br />

The focus of the fourth and most comprehensive chapter is the landscape architectural aspects<br />

of roundabouts. It begins with a brief overview about the assignment methods for the<br />

116

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!