Evaluation in der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit - HWWI
Evaluation in der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit - HWWI Evaluation in der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit - HWWI
Anhänge 203 In what way does the agency assess the effectiveness of its contributions to multilateral organisations? To what extent does it rely on the evaluation systems of multilateral agencies? 7. Dissemination, feedback, knowledge management and learning How are evaluation findings disseminated? In addition to reports, are other communication tools used? (press releases, press conferences, abstracts, annual reports providing a synthesis of findings)? What are the mechanisms in place to ensure feedback of evaluation results to policy makers, operational staff and the general public? What mechanisms are in place to ensure that knowledge from evaluation is accessible to staff and relevant stakeholders? Is evaluation considered a ‘learning tool’ by agency staff? 8. Evaluation Use Who are the main users of evaluations within and outside the aid agency? Does evaluation respond to the information needs expressed by parliament, audit office, government, the public? Are there systems in place to ensure the follow up and implementation of evaluation findings and recommendations? How does the aid agency/ministry promote follow up on findings from relevant stakeholders (through e.g. steering groups, advisory panels, sounding boards)? Are links with decision making processes ensured to promote the use of evaluation in policy formulation? Are there recent examples of major operation and policy changes sparked by evaluation findings and recommendations? Are there examples of how evaluation serves as an accountability mechanism? What are the perceptions of non evaluation actors (operation and policy departments, field offices, etc) regarding the usefulness and influence of evaluation? References: DAC Principles on Evaluation of Development Assistance [OCDE/GD(91)208] Review of the DAC Principles on Evaluation of Development Assistance OECD(1998) Strengthening Evaluation Systems in Member Agencies [DCD/DAC/EV(2004)1] Evaluation systems in DAC Member Agencies; a study based on DAC Peer Reviews, presented at the Second Meeting of the DAC Network on Development Evaluation , Paris 9-10 2004 5
204 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockmann 7.5 DAC Evaluation Quality Standards DAC Evaluation Network DAC Evaluation Quality Standards (for test phase application) The attached draft standards were approved by the members of the DAC Network on Development Evaluation at its fourth meeting on 30-31 March 2006 for a test phase application of three years. Experience with the use of the standards by members and interested partners will inform the final agreement of the standards.
- Seite 154 und 155: Die Qualität der Evaluationssystem
- Seite 156 und 157: Die Qualität der Evaluationssystem
- Seite 158 und 159: Die Qualität der Evaluationssystem
- Seite 160 und 161: Die Qualität der Evaluationssystem
- Seite 162 und 163: Die Qualität der Evaluationssystem
- Seite 164 und 165: Die Qualität der Evaluationssystem
- Seite 166 und 167: Empfehlungen zur Reform der Evaluat
- Seite 168 und 169: Empfehlungen zur Reform der Evaluat
- Seite 170: Empfehlungen zur Reform der Evaluat
- Seite 173 und 174: 172 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 175 und 176: 174 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 177 und 178: 176 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 179 und 180: 178 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 181 und 182: 180 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 183 und 184: 182 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 185 und 186: 184 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 187 und 188: 186 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 189 und 190: 188 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 191 und 192: 190 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 193 und 194: 192 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 195 und 196: 194 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 197 und 198: 196 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 199 und 200: 198 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 201 und 202: 200 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 203: 202 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 207 und 208: 206 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 209 und 210: 208 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 211 und 212: 210 Axel Borrmann & Reinhard Stockm
- Seite 213 und 214: 212 Die Autoren der Systemprüfung
Anhänge 203<br />
In what way does the agency assess the effectiveness of its contributions to multilateral<br />
organisations? To what extent does it rely on the evaluation systems of multilateral agencies?<br />
7. Dissem<strong>in</strong>ation, feedback, knowledge management and learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
How are evaluation f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs dissem<strong>in</strong>ated? In addition to reports, are other communication<br />
tools used? (press releases, press conferences, abstracts, annual reports provid<strong>in</strong>g a synthesis<br />
of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs)?<br />
What are the mechanisms <strong>in</strong> place to ensure feedback of evaluation results to policy makers,<br />
operational staff and the general public?<br />
What mechanisms are <strong>in</strong> place to ensure that knowledge from evaluation is accessible to staff<br />
and relevant stakehol<strong>der</strong>s?<br />
Is evaluation consi<strong>der</strong>ed a ‘learn<strong>in</strong>g tool’ by agency staff?<br />
8. <strong>Evaluation</strong> Use<br />
Who are the ma<strong>in</strong> users of evaluations with<strong>in</strong> and outside the aid agency?<br />
Does evaluation respond to the <strong>in</strong>formation needs expressed by parliament, audit office,<br />
government, the public?<br />
Are there systems <strong>in</strong> place to ensure the follow up and implementation of evaluation f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
and recommendations?<br />
How does the aid agency/m<strong>in</strong>istry promote follow up on f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from relevant stakehol<strong>der</strong>s<br />
(through e.g. steer<strong>in</strong>g groups, advisory panels, sound<strong>in</strong>g boards)?<br />
Are l<strong>in</strong>ks with decision mak<strong>in</strong>g processes ensured to promote the use of evaluation <strong>in</strong> policy<br />
formulation?<br />
Are there recent examples of major operation and policy changes sparked by evaluation<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and recommendations?<br />
Are there examples of how evaluation serves as an accountability mechanism?<br />
What are the perceptions of non evaluation actors (operation and policy departments, field offices,<br />
etc) regard<strong>in</strong>g the usefulness and <strong>in</strong>fluence of evaluation?<br />
References:<br />
DAC Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples on <strong>Evaluation</strong> of Development Assistance [OCDE/GD(91)208]<br />
Review of the DAC Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples on <strong>Evaluation</strong> of Development Assistance OECD(1998)<br />
Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Evaluation</strong> Systems <strong>in</strong> Member Agencies [DCD/DAC/EV(2004)1]<br />
<strong>Evaluation</strong> systems <strong>in</strong> DAC Member Agencies; a study based on DAC Peer Reviews, presented at the Second Meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of the DAC Network on Development <strong>Evaluation</strong> , Paris 9-10 2004<br />
5