25.08.2013 Aufrufe

Nachhaltiges Europa Abschlusspublikation - Global Marshall Plan

Nachhaltiges Europa Abschlusspublikation - Global Marshall Plan

Nachhaltiges Europa Abschlusspublikation - Global Marshall Plan

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

• We are developing integrated holistic strategies<br />

for a sustainable use of natural resources and<br />

the prevention and recycling of waste, while our<br />

Integrated Product Policy initiative seeks to reduce<br />

the environmental impacts of products throughout<br />

their lifecycles.<br />

• At a big EU biodiversity conference in Ireland,<br />

organised by the Irish Presidency, we identified<br />

further measures that we need to take to stop<br />

biodiversity loss in the EU, but also globally.<br />

• We will soon publish a Handbook on Green<br />

Public Procurement, which will advise public<br />

authorities at all levels in the Member States how<br />

to purchase sustainable goods and services.<br />

• We are reaching out to citizens by informing<br />

them on environmental matters and encouraging<br />

them to participate in decision-making, by closely<br />

consulting their associations and other stakeholders<br />

when we draw up new policies, and by giving<br />

consumers a choice through eco-labelling.<br />

• Major policy proposals by the European Commission<br />

are now accompanied by impact assessments,<br />

which examine and balance their economic,<br />

social and environmental effects.<br />

Secondly, the EU has taken steps to improve coherence<br />

between its internal policies and their external<br />

effects. The ongoing reforms of the EU's<br />

common agricultural and fisheries policies clearly<br />

represent a move towards greater sustainability.<br />

Thirdly, we are delivering on our international<br />

commitments.<br />

• The EU offered major concessions to inject<br />

new life into the WTO talks under the Doha<br />

Development Agenda.<br />

• Overall, EU Member States are steadily increasing<br />

their levels of official development aid as<br />

agreed at the international Monterrey conference<br />

on financing development two years ago.<br />

• We are spending this aid more effectively<br />

through better co-ordination of development cooperation<br />

policies, the untying of aid, and participation<br />

in the Heavily Indebted Poor Country Initia-<br />

tive.<br />

• Last, but not least, we launched three major<br />

Partnership initiatives in Johannesburg: the EU<br />

Energy Initiative, the Forest Action <strong>Plan</strong> and the<br />

EU Water Initiative. For the Water Initiative, which<br />

seeks to improve access to clean water and sanitation<br />

in the developing world, the EU has recently<br />

made half a billion € available.<br />

SD and economic growth<br />

<strong>Nachhaltiges</strong> <strong>Europa</strong><br />

As you can see, the EU’s record in advancing sustainable<br />

development both in the EU and globally<br />

is impressive. However, we must not fool our-<br />

selves by painting too rosy a picture. We are not<br />

there yet.<br />

We have the tools, we have the knowledge, we<br />

have the commitments. So, what is missing?<br />

I would like to raise this question for discussion<br />

here, but will briefly mention two issues that I<br />

consider important.<br />

One problem I see is that economic growth is still<br />

regarded as the main key to improving human<br />

welfare. And during times of economic downturn,<br />

all the other aspects of sustainable development -<br />

its social, environmental, future-oriented and<br />

intra-generational dimensions - tend to be consid-<br />

ered “unaffordable extras.”<br />

Most of us will probably agree that this is a shortsighted<br />

view. There is no business case for using<br />

chemicals without knowing what they do to us. We<br />

are paying dearly for this mistake, for example by<br />

spending billions of € and US$ on treating and<br />

compensating victims of asbestos and removing it<br />

from our buildings.<br />

There is no business case for standing by and<br />

watching climate change unfold. According to<br />

Swiss Re, one of the world's largest re-insurers,<br />

the economic costs of global warming threaten to<br />

rise to 150 billion dollars a year in 10 years.<br />

And still, opposition to REACH and our climate<br />

change policies is strong. Is it due to the fact that<br />

the critics are not the ones who have to pay for<br />

the damage caused by chemicals and climate<br />

change - that the external costs of certain policies<br />

and practices are not internalised? If political leaders<br />

are willing to change this - how can they do<br />

this without triggering an exodus of businesses?<br />

Secondly, sustainable development will not happen<br />

unless there is real demand for it in society –<br />

and this demand is not there yet. Is it because it is<br />

a somewhat abstract concept that is difficult to<br />

convey in concrete terms? What is needed to convince<br />

the wider public of the value of sustainable<br />

development?<br />

As I said at the beginning, sustainable development<br />

is a vision. It has the potential to become a<br />

guiding principle for future human development<br />

and to help us reach a balance between economic<br />

freedoms, social justice and a healthy planet,<br />

between North and South – planet, people,<br />

prosperity.<br />

11

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!