for 14 Copyright Schwarz et al. Dimensionsverän<strong>der</strong>ungen des Alveolarknochens by 64. Tempro PJ, Nalbandian J. Colonization of retrieved polyte- 84. Paul BF, Mellonig JT, Towle HJ 3rd, Gray JL. Use of a collatrafluoroethylene membranes: Morphological and microbiogen barrier to enhance healing in human periodontal furca- Not logical observations. J Periodontol 1993;64:162-168. tion defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 65. Greenstein G, Caton JG. Biodegradable barriers and guided 1992;12:123-131. tissue regeneration. Periodontology 2000 1993;1:36-45. 85. Pitaru S, Tal H, Soldinger M, Grosskopf A, Noff M. Partial re- 66. Hutmacher D, Hürzeler MB, Schliephake H. A review of mageneration of periodontal tissues using collagen barriers. terial properties of biodegradable and bioresorbable poly- Initial observations in the canine. J Periodontol mers and devices for GTR and GBR applications. Int J Oral 1988;59:380-386. Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:667-678. 86. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sculean A, Herten M, Scherbaum 67. Kohal RJ, Mellas P, Hürzeler MB, Trejo PM, Morrison E, W, Becker J. Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes Caffesse RG. The effects of guided bone regeneration and in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast- grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction solike cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:443-449. ckets. An experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol 87. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Sager M, Becker J. 1998;69:927-937. Angiogenesis pattern of native and cross-linked collagen 68. Magnusson I, Batich C, Collins BR. New attachment forma- membranes: An immunohistochemical study in the rat. Clin tion following controlled tissue regeneration using biodegra- Oral Implants Res 2006 (im Druck). dable membranes. J Periodontol 1988;59:1-6. 88. Schmid J, Wallkamm B, Hämmerle CH, Gogolewski S, Lang 69. Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL. Collagen membranes: A review. J NP. The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regene- Periodontol 2001;72:215-229. ration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. Clin Oral 70. Haney JM, Nilveus RE, McMillan PJ, Wikesjo UM. Implants Res 1997;8:244-248. Periodontal repair in dogs: Expanded polytetrafluoroethyle- 89. Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Tal H. Efficacy of porous bovine ne barrier membranes support wound stabilization and en- bone mineral in various types of osseous deficiencies: hance bone regeneration. J Periodontol 1993;64:883-890. Clinical observations and literature review. Int J Periodontics 71. Wikesjö UM, Kean CJ, Zimmerman GJ. Periodontal repair in Restorative Dent 2001;21:395-405. dogs: Supraalveolar defect models for evaluation of safety 90. Brugnami F, Then PR, Moroi H, Kabani S, Leone CW. GBR in and efficacy of periodontal reconstructive therapy. J human extraction sockets and ridge defects prior to implant Periodontol 1994;65:1151-1157. placement: Clinical results and histologic evidence of osteo- 72. Wikesjö UM, Claffey N, Egelberg J. Periodontal repair in blastic and osteoclastic activities in DFDBA. Int J Periodontics dogs. Effect of heparin treatment of the root surface. J Clin Restorative Dent 1999;19:259-267. Periodontol 1991;18:60-64. 91. Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human 73. Wikesjö UM, Nilveus R. Periodontal repair in dogs: Effect of extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss. Clin Oral Implants Res wound stabilization on healing. J Periodontol 1990;61:719-724. 2003;14:137-143. 74. Somerman MJ, Sauk JJ, Foster RA, Norris K, Dickerson K, 92. Fowler EB, Breault LG, Rebitski G. Ridge preservation utili- Argraves WS. Cell attachment activity of cementum: Bone zing an acellular <strong>der</strong>mal allograft and demineralized freeze- sialoprotein II identified in cementum. J Periodont Res dried bone allograft: Part II. Immediate endosseous implant 1991;26:10-16. placement. J Periodontol 2000;71:1360-1364. 75. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, 93. Klokkevold PR, Han TJ, Camargo PM. Aesthetic manage- Becker J. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen ment of extractions for implant site development: Delayed membranes: An experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral versus staged implant placement. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Implants Res 2005;16:369-378. Dent 1999;11:603-610; quiz 612. 76. Garrett S, Loos B, Chamberlain D, Egelberg J. Treatment of 94. Smukler H, Landi L, Setayesh R. Histomorphometric evalua- intraosseous periodontal defects with a combined adjunctition of extraction sockets and deficient alveolar ridges treave therapy of citric acid conditioning, bone grafting, and plated with allograft and barrier membrane: A pilot study. Int J cement of collagenous membranes. J Clin Periodontol Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:407-416. 1988;15:383-389. 95. Sy IP, Perio D. Site development in periodontal therapy-al- 77. Tonetti MS, Pini-Prato G, Cortellini P. Periodontal regeneraveolar bone augmentation as an adjunct to endosseous imtion of human intrabony defects. IV. Determinants of heplant placement. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:821aling response. J Periodontol 1993;64:934-940. 826, 828, 830 passim; quiz 836. 78. Tonetti MS, Prato GP, Cortellini P. Factors affecting the he- 96. Wiesen M, Kitzis R. Preservation of the alveolar ridge at imaling response of intrabony defects following guided tissue plant sites. Periodont Clin Investig 1998;20:17-20. regeneration and access flap surgery. J Clin Periodontol 97. Yang J, Lee HM, Vernino A. Ridge preservation of dentition 1996;23:548-556. with severe periodontitis. Compend Contin Educ Dent 79. Brunel G, Piantoni P, Elharar F, Benque E, Marin P, Zahedi S. 2000;21:579-583; quiz 584. Regeneration of rat calvarial defects using a bioabsorbable 98. Dies F, Etienne D, Abboud NB, Ouhayoun JP. Bone regene- membrane technique: Influence of collagen cross-linking. J ration in extraction sites after immediate placement of an e- Periodontol 1996;67:1342-1348. PTFE membrane with or without a biomaterial. A report on 80. Kodama T, Minabe M, Hori T, Watanabe Y. The effect of va- 12 consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:277rious concentrations of collagen barrier on periodontal 285. wound healing. J Periodontol 1989;60:205-210. 99. Chen ST, Dahlin C. Connective tissue grafting for primary 81. Minabe M, Kodama T, Kogou T, Tamura T, Hori T, Watanabe closure of extraction sockets treated with an osteopromoti- Y, Miyata T. Different cross-linked types of collagen implanve membrane technique: Surgical technique and clinical reted in rat palatal gingiva. J Periodontol 1989;60:35-43. sults. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:348-355. 82. Quteish D, Dolby AE. The use of irradiated-crosslinked hu- 100. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in heman collagen membrane in guided tissue regeneration. J aling of human extraction sockets: 2. Histochemical obser- Clin Periodontol 1992;19:476-484. vations at 9 months. J Periodontol 2001;72:152-159. 83. Zahedi S, Legrand R, Brunel G, Albert A, Dewe W, Coumans 101. Brugnami F, Then PR, Moroi H, Leone CW. Histologic eva- B, Bernard JP. Evaluation of a diphenylphosphorylazideluation of human extraction sockets treated with deminecrosslinked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneratiralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and cell occluon in mandibular defects in rats. J Periodontol 1998;69: 1238-1246. sive membrane. J Periodontol 1996;67:821-825. Implantologie 2006;14(4):000-000 Not for Publication Quintessence
Schwarz et al. Dimensionsverän<strong>der</strong>ungen des Alveolarknochens 15 102. Becker W, Clokie C, Sennerby L, Urist MR, Becker BE. Histologic findings after implantation and evaluation of different grafting materials and titanium micro screws into extraction sockets: Case reports. J Periodontol 1998;69:414-421. 103. Simon BI, von Hagen S, Deasy MJ, Faldu M, Resnansky D. Changes in alveolar bone height and width following ridge augmentation using bone graft and membranes. J Periodontol 2000;71:1774-1791. Current Aspects on Influencing Dimensional Changes of the Alveolar Bone Following Tooth Extraction KEYWORDS Bone healing, tooth extraction, bone atrophy, bone regeneration, immediate implantation, guided tissue regeneration The aim of the present review paper is to address, based on the currently available evidence, aspects specifically related to the preservation of the architecture and contours of the osseous tissues in sites where a tooth extraction is performed. Implantologie 2006;14(4):000-000 Not for Publication Copyright by Not for Quintessence
Change language