Sharing Knowledge: Scientific Communication - SSOAR
Sharing Knowledge: Scientific Communication - SSOAR
Sharing Knowledge: Scientific Communication - SSOAR
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
182 Hans E. Roosendaal, Peter A. Th. M. Geurts<br />
hout Europe and the new opportunities for distance and lifelong learning that<br />
ICT provides.<br />
1 Introduction<br />
Stakeholder-based systems are characterised in their development by the optimising<br />
behaviour of these stakeholders. The scientific information is such a system<br />
and is governed by the following:<br />
“Authors want to publish more, readers want to read less.”<br />
This law states that wide exposure is paramount to the author of scientific information<br />
and that (pre)selection is paramount to its reader. It determines largely<br />
the value chain of scientific information. Any force like the use of Information<br />
and <strong>Communication</strong> Technology (ICT) by the stakeholders involved (authors,<br />
readers, academic libraries, scientific publishers etc.) that allows better fulfilling<br />
this law is an engine for change of the value chain. And this will prompt changes<br />
in the roles of the stakeholders in scientific communication.<br />
1.1 Complex information and empowerment 2<br />
<strong>Scientific</strong> information is a particular example of a class of information called<br />
complex information. Complex information is essentially information that is integrated<br />
over the entire value chain of a particular process. Complex information<br />
is therefore per definition information of strategic relevance, be it for an entire<br />
industry or business, for an entire enterprise or for any larger organisation, be<br />
this a private or public organisation or even a private-public co-operation. A<br />
good example of such an organisation being dependent on complex information<br />
is an academic institution, or generally a knowledge-intensive organisation.<br />
The information carried in each individual link of the value chain will be of a<br />
different nature, form, norm, standard etc than in another link in the chain. The<br />
intriguing issue then is to integrate the information carried by the various links<br />
in such a way as to create a fully integrated information chain over the entire value<br />
chain.<br />
In such a value chain we can distinguish between generic stakeholders or<br />
main actors and institutional stakeholders or facilitators or intermediaries.<br />
Using this terminology we see that in the value chain for scientific information<br />
the author and the reader are the generic stakeholders and universities, publis-<br />
2 Hans E. Roosendaal, Theo W.C. Huibers, Peter A. Th. M. Geurts and Paul E. van der Vet,<br />
“Changes in the value Chain of <strong>Scientific</strong> Information: Economic Consequences for Academic<br />
Institutions and their Information Provision”, Online Information Review, accepted<br />
for publication