THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA - Scattered Seed Ministries

Marx Hubbard (for "the elders"), David Spangler (for "John", "Pan" and simply "God") and
Ruth Montgomery.
There is one all-inclusive document that does not exist on the physical plane, which
occultists say may be briefly glimpsed only at the 'highest level of consciousness': this is
called the "Akashic Record", said to be an imprint of all past and future events.
9. How good are the NA gods as Guides? A sample of their track record:
9a. Joint Cooperation and Responsibility - Although the "Masters" revealed to Blavatsky that
they are "bound together in one spiritual solidarity of thought and deed," (_Isis Unveiled_ II,
p.159), their united deed does not always bring about the promised results. They have even
admitted making errors in choosing their vehicles - repeatedly - after confirming the wisdom
of their choices. If these were indeed errors of judgment, not only is the specific "Master" to
blame, but the entire Hierarchy, since "there is the closest co-operation in all departments...
Owing to the Unity of consciousness of those who are free from the three lower planes, what
transpires in one department is known in the others." (Alice Bailey, _Initiation Human and
Solar_, p.106) Yet when an earthly channel proves disappointing, it is not the infinitely more
advanced god-entity who takes responsibility, but the hapless human who had previously been
promoted as a Light to the enlightened. For example, Krishnamurti was hailed as a true
vehicle of Maitreya by the Theosophical Society, and he asserted with obvious devotion in
1927, "I am blending into the consciousness of the one Teacher... He will completely fill me."
(_Krishnamurti: The Years of Awakening_, p.241). Only 5 years later, his "Teacher" publicly
disowned him in a most humiliating manner: "It became all but impossible for him to be used
any longer as my medium." ("Lord Maitreya", _Through the Eyes of the Masters: Meditations
and Portraits_, p.66) Even Alice Bailey herself, who dedicated her life as a channel for the
"Masters", got the ax nearly 30 years ago in a similarly ungrateful tone: "In the past we have
had to withdraw our support from those who were given the opportunity to represent us. The
one who for a time had the opportunity of representing the master Djwal Kuhl soon lost that
authority through intellectual pride and the brittleness of the lower mental body, which can
never be the channel of the mind of God. Thus I expose to you the false teachings subtly
woven into the work of Alice Bailey, whose failure to surrender totally rendered her unfit as
an instrument of the Tibetan Master." ("Master Kuthumi", "An Expose of False Teachings",
_Pearls of Wisdom_ 19/5, Feb. 1, 1976, p.28) [This is a warning to NA channels everywhere
to expect no thanks for their years of service if they should fall from favor for any reason. It
also represents a crisis of confidence for those who base their lives on "transmissions from the
Masters". If Bailey's works are shot through with "false teaching", then the Hierarchy did not
show a basic level of responsibility by stopping the UN, Lucis Trust, Robert Muller and all
the other NA missionaries now spreading Bailey's teachings in their entirety. On the other
hand, if Bailey teachings are still valid, then there must be false Masters roaming about,
feeding disinformation to gullible NA audiences... in which case one might ask why all
transmissions and "Masters" should not be considered suspect.]
9b. Judging Human Development - The "Masters" have an iffy track record in prediction as
well, even when they blame humans in advance for any potential error. Ruth Montgomery
relayed from her "Guides" the warning that a nuclear World War III would take place in 1987,
unless enlightened humanity banded together to "send forth the energies toward peace." They
gloomily predicted, however, that this war was "unlikely to be averted." (_Strangers..._
p.191) "Were there millions of Walk-ins working in unison, that catastrophe could perhaps be
prevented, but in this present age of prosperity how many luxury lovers are likely to say to a
disincarnate, 'Take my place.'" (p.53-54) [Here, compared to only 10 pages earlier, we see an
abrupt switch from the compassionate offer to relieve discouraged individuals of their