25.02.2013 Aufrufe

THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA - Scattered Seed Ministries

THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA - Scattered Seed Ministries

THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA - Scattered Seed Ministries

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

above). Katz: "One idea was being overlooked, I offered, the belief that G-d's providence<br />

ensured Jewish survival." He writes that Schachter-Shalomi did not respond directly, except<br />

to mention a need to answer "how" the Jews survived (origin) as well as "why" they did<br />

(purpose). [This non-answer was apparently to pacify Katz rather than to enlighten the<br />

Buddhist leader, who never did hear about G-d's role in Jewish survival. Nathan writes three<br />

days later: "Listening to the Dalai Lama talk about us, one gets the impression that we Jews<br />

survived by an act of will."] Another astute observation was the dilemma posed by the Dalai<br />

Lama's customary title, "Your Holiness", which Katz feels can "imply that he is divinity, an<br />

idea which would compromise an observant Jew." Katz, recognized as a "scholar of South<br />

Asian religions including Tibetan Buddhism", was drawing on a well-informed background.<br />

He notes that a "discussion" of this issue took place, but although he records the Greenbergs'<br />

apprehension over how to keep kashrut (dietary laws) in such a venue, no worry on their part<br />

is mentioned over possibly idolatrous titles. Witnessing the spectacle of orthodox Jewish<br />

intercourse with a foreign religion brought Katz to muse: "This sort of dialog must raise<br />

issues of avodah zarah", a term meaning worship forbidden in the Torah - although Katz only<br />

knows it as "a derogatory term meaning 'other people's worship'". Katz knows that this is<br />

"something to be avoided by observant Jews. Is Tibetan Buddhism avodah zarah, or is it<br />

another name of G-d?" This was properly a question for the Greenbergs to grapple with, but<br />

apparently Katz was the only one troubled by the possibility. In fact, even Hinduism posed<br />

no conflict for the "observant Jews" in the group; a Jew turned Hindu guru completed their<br />

minyan (minimum quorum) for synagogue prayers.<br />

The only real confrontation came over the great numbers of Jews leaving Judaism to join<br />

Tibetan Buddhism. But again, the one who spoke up was not the orthodox rabbi or rebbetzin,<br />

but the academic expert Katz. And, speaking "on behalf of us all", his complaint was not that<br />

Jews were being compromised in their covenant with their own G-d, but that "we suffer from<br />

a brain drain on a community level." It was the Dalai Lama who returned the issue to a<br />

spiritual level, where it belonged. His response began with a recommendation for Judaism to<br />

imitate Buddhism, but he ended with a challenge to basic Torah Judaism to prove itself: "If<br />

you have these spiritual values [as we do], then there is no reason to fear; if you have no such<br />

values, then there is no reason to hold on." In other words, if Judaism is spiritually satisfying,<br />

Jews should feel no need to tack on pieces of another religion. If not, then it would be better<br />

just to abandon Judaism for a more satisfying religion. Then, with keen insight into the fatal<br />

flaw of Jewish Renewal, he added: "If you cannot provide spiritual satisfaction to others and<br />

at the same time insist on holding on to them, then that is foolishness." If Judaism is not<br />

adequate as itself, all attempts to "renew" it as a way to keep Jews at home will fail. Why<br />

hold people to something that has failed them? Why not let them move on to pure Buddhism?<br />

[According to Bailey's spirit guide, Buddhism is indeed scheduled to replace Judaism, and<br />

even become aggressive in supplanting other religions.]<br />

"CLAL - The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership": This organization was<br />

founded by Yitz Greenberg in 1974, ostensibly to reach out to marginal Jews and bring them<br />

into a Jewish framework. In reality, CLAL is busy doing the opposite: breaking down the<br />

historical Jewish framework in order to include the NA spirituality which the marginal Jews<br />

have accepted. The key question would be: Is CLAL engaged in naive compromise to appeal<br />

to all tastes, or deliberate efforts to undermine traditional Judaism? We have a pointed<br />

answer from CLAL, set apart in its own paragraph for added emphasis: "Transformation has<br />

always been integral to CLAL's mission." (CLAL Update, Fall 1997) [Watch as we run into<br />

some of the most popular "blinds", or code words used in NA. By repeating terms like<br />

"transformation", "higher wisdom", "new era" and "new paradigm" - terms foreign to Jewish<br />

thought but basic to NA teaching - the "change agents" are signaling their presence to other

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!