THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA - Scattered Seed Ministries

healthy as the following restructure. This cosmology was shared by many cultures: the
Zoroastrians of Persia (who greatly impressed Nietzsche), the Hindu writers of the Veda, the
Greek gnostics (particularly Pythagoras, who carried the concept from Egypt), the
Manachaeans (gnostic Christians), the Cathars, Nordic legends (Angeberts, p.68ff) and
Germanic lore tranmitted mostly through Wagner (p.154). It is also a pillar of Theosophical
teaching and of Alice Bailey, who clearly approved of Hitler's role in destroying the old order
and "establishing of a new world order", as Hitler described it in Bailey's own words.
(Angeberts, p.155)
A tactic especially interesting to Jews which was shared by both Nazism and NA is faulting
the Jews for rejecting Jesus as their Messiah. Like Hitler, no NA leaders accept Jesus's
claims as recorded in the New Testament, yet they make much of the fact that the Jews did
not either. While Hitler drew on Martin Luther's vitrolic condemnation of the Jews for
stubbornly rejecting Jesus, Alice Bailey simply adds this rejection to her tally of the Jews'
karmic debt: "Christ came to bring an end to the Jewish dispensation which should have
climaxed and passed away as a religion... In the rejection of Christ as the Messiah, the Jewish
race has remained symbolically and practically in the [astrological] sign of Aries, the
Scapegoat [actually Aries is a ram, as noted elsewhere in her book, but the purpose for this
"mistake" is self-evident]... they will repeat their ancient sin of non-response to the
evolutionary process. They rejected that which was new and spiritual in the desert [by making
the golden calf at Sinai]; they did it again in Palestine 2000 years ago; will they do it again, as
opportunity is offered to them?" (Alice Bailey, _The Reappearance of the Christ_, p.81)
[Here we have a masterful "catch-22", for if the Jews reject Maitreya as a false messiah, they
will "remain the Scapegoat" and be removed from the new humanity as they deserve. If they
accept him, they will accept his assessment that past karma requires their annihilation - first
spiritual erasure and then physical death. The only question is whether they will go out in
submission or in rebellion, but go they will...]
Knowing that Christians are susceptible to such reasoning, today's NAers have become adept
at using "Christian" arguments against the Jews. Christians coming from an environment that
never mentioned Alice Bailey will recognize the eerie similarity of Bailey's quote above to the
widespread Christian doctrine known as "Replacement Theology", the belief that the Jewish
dispensation ended with Christ and that the failure of Jews to accept him cost them their place
as G-d's chosen people. But the Christian linkage is maintained on the NA side for its PR
value only; it rallies support among Christians for their own goals, while they work for the
end of both the Jews and the Christians, as did Hitler. [A case can be made that the very
existence of this as a "Christian" theology may be due to NA infiltration into Christian
leadership. Only someone who is indifferent to the survival of Christianity could support such
a belief, because if Replacement happened to the Jews, there is no guarantee that it won't
happen next time to the Christians! Precisely the argument that NA uses.]
Besides all the above common ground, there is universal reverence in NA and Nazism
for Tibetan Buddhism. Blavatsky and other Theosophists considered the Tibetan Himalayas
the home of the Hierarchy themselves. According to some opinions, Hitler sent SS officers to
the Himalayas not only to seek out the source of the Aryan race, but if possible to make
contact with "Asgard" and consult directly with the "ascended masters". A colony of Tibetan
Buddhists flourished in Berlin (Angeberts, p.215). The translator of Angeberts' work, Lewis
Sumberg, notes that the Russian troops entering Berlin in May 1945 found "the corpses of a
thousand men of Himalayan origin, in German uniform, but carrying no papers or
identification." (p.281-282) [One wonders what today's Dalai Lama might be conveniently