THE RAINBOW SWASTIKA - Scattered Seed Ministries

The answer is alarmingly simple. In the New Age Plan to which the UN is
dedicated,"quality of life" is a collective value, not to be interpreted by the selfish desires of
an individual or group. Certain forward-looking global figures have been telling us for
decades that the individual's "quality of life" is secondary to that of the community: "Life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness are basic rights. But they are the rights of the individual
and were listed [in the Declaration of Independence] at such a time when the literatures of
freedom and dignity were concerned with the aggrandizement of the individual. They have
only a minor bearing on the survival of a culture." (B.F. Skinner, prominent Harvard
psychologist and writer). "The ill-conceived 'love of neighbor' has to disappear, especially in
relation to inferior or asocial creatures... in order to secure the maintenance of a hereditarily
sound and racially pure people.... The life of an individual has meaning only in the light of
that ultimate aim." (Dr. Arthur Guett, Nazi Director of Public Health) "We have seen more
than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be
strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser
sacrifices." (U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, in Buck v. Bell) "Society as
the trustee of life is responsible to [collective] life for every botched [individual] life that
comes into existence... [therefore society should] make it impossible for them ever to see the
light of day." (Friedreich Nietzsche) [in all of the above, emphasis is mine to show parallels]
3d. Balance with the Earth is a NA principle which reminds mankind that in the midst of all
his advances, he must not forget that he is also part of a Bigger Design in the cosmos. We
might assume that this is meant to offset the eugenic mentality of omnipotence and impart a
humbler perspective of man's position - and so it is at the grassroots level. However, it is a
two-tiered philosophy which further serves the eugenics policy with regard to the upper ranks
of NA leadership.
Part of man's enlightenment is to realize his responsibilities to care for the Earth. [Please note
that New Agers are not speaking here about ecology, although they use genuine ecology to
attract caring, responsible people. We are now examining a religion in which man serves the
Earth, capital "E", as a goddess/mother.] While man is certainly obligated to take better care
of the planet's resources, in the NA value system the Earth does not exist to serve and sustain
man; nor is man, for all his uniqueness in nature, to be regarded as superior to nature in any
way. Both concepts, derived from Judaism, are arrogant and wrong. "To give preference to
the life of a being simply because it is a member of our species would put us in the same
position as racists." ("bioethicist" Peter Singer, _Animal Liberation_. Significantly, Professor
Singer is now Chairman of Princeton University's "Center for Human Values".) In the same
spirit, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (champion of compulsory
sterilization laws as noted in the eugenics section) commented, "I see no reason for attributing
to man a significance different in kind from that which belongs to a baboon or a grain of
sand."
But it is not enough that man is no longer to be considered the crowning achievement in
creation, or even that "Mother Earth's needs" must come before those of global humanity. By
some peculiar reverse logic, man in his newly-found godhood begins his divine "at-one-ment"
with Nature by admitting that he is an alien, an intruder, a blight on Nature: "Human
happiness and certainly human fecundity are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I
know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn't true.... We
have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth.... Until such time as homo sapiens
should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along."
(U.S. National Park Service biologist David Graber, reviewing Bill McKibben's _The End of
Nature_ in _The Los Angeles Times_, Oct. 22, 1989) "The real enemy [which humanity