SPEciAL - ALU-WEB.DE

SPEciAL - ALU-WEB.DE SPEciAL - ALU-WEB.DE

23.02.2013 Aufrufe

esearch formed whose phase composition depends on the initial concentration of TiC reinforcement. The SEM-EDS (Fig. 2) and XRD analyse (Fig. 2a) of pressureless sintered samples with an initial composition 90 vol.% Mg 2 Si and 10 vol.% TiC revealed the presence of dense, secondary aggregates consisting of TiSi 2 and elemental silicon. These aggregates, approx. 20 µm in size, appeared typically inbetween non-reacted Mg 2 Si grains and TiC reinforcement (Fig. 2), indicating that they are products of chemical reaction between these two species. At a low initial concentration (≤10 vol.%) of TiC reinforcement, the following overall chemical reaction is believed to proceed between Mg 2 Si and TiC: 3Mg 2 Si + TiC = TiSi 2 + Si + 6Mg + C (1) According to Eq.1, elemental magnesium and carbon should be also detected in the samples as intermediates, which however, could not be proved by XRD. Note that liberated elemental magnesium most probably rapidly evaporates from the reaction zone, while elemental carbon is difficult to detect in a mixture with TiC. In the microstructure of pressureless reactive sintered samples with a higher amount of TiC reinforcement (≥20 vol.%), Figs.3 and 3a, close to TiSi 2 , the formation of Ti 3 SiC 2 and SiC secondary phases was also demonstrated. Due to the high reactivity, the microstructure of these samples is rather complex but still uniform. The following chemical reaction is proposed to occur in that particular case: 7Mg 2 Si + 4TiC = Ti 3 SiC 2 + TiSi 2 + 14Mg + 4SiC (2) In contrast to the reactive Mg 2 Si-TiC system, Mg 2 Si-TiB 2 is non-reactive. During the early stage of pressureless sintering, Mg 2 Si particles melt incongruently, forming a peritectic. Further densification of the samples proceeds via pressureless liquid sintering. On cooling the samples, the molten phase crystallizes in the form of a continuous matrix with an average composi- tion of Mg0.15Si0.85 , bonding Mg2Si and TiB2 particles without formation of secondary phases, Figs.4 and 4a. The mechanical properties of reactive pressureless sintered Mg2Si-TiC and liquid pressureless sintered Mg- 2Si-TiB2 samples are listed in Table 3. The modulus of elasticity and tensile strength are generally improved by increasing the amount of TiC or TiB2 reinforcement in the Mg2Si matrix. The improvement is, as in the case of Mg2Si-Mg-TiC composites, caused by an increase of the amount of reinforcements that is well bonded to the composite matrix. However, it is important to note that in the case of Mg2Si-TiC composites, bonding of TiC pariculates and the secondarily formed TiSi2 particles with the matrix is predominantly chemically assisted, while in the case of Mg2Si-TiB2 composites bonding is achieved though solidification of the peritectic liquid phase formed in situ. Comparison of the modulus of elasticity and tensile strength of reactive and liquid pressureless sintered samples revealed no significant differences. However, as evident from Table 2 and 3, the modulus of elasticity and tensile strength of sintered samples are much higher than in infiltrated Mg2Si-Mg-Ti ones. A possible explanation for that lies in the apparently stronger interaction between matrix and reinforcement in sintered samples than that between the preform skeleton (Mg2Si-TiC) and molten infiltrant (Mg) in the case of infiltrated species. The Vickers hardness of pressureless sintered samples was found to be enhanced with an increasing amount of particulate reinforcement in the composite matrix, Table 3. This could be ascribed toan increased dislocation density in the microstructure and the presence of hard, brittle and essentially elastically deforming reinforcing phases in the Mg2Si matrix. In addition, Vickers hardness measurements also confirmed that sintering of powder mixtures with the same initial volume fraction of TiC or TiB2 reinforcement (compositions A and C or B and D in Table 1) resulted in composite samples with similar hardness. Comparing the microhard- Fig. 3: SEM micrograph of pressureless sintered composite sample with the initial composition 80 vol.% Mg 2 Si and 20 vol.% TiC Fig 3a: XRD of the sample shown in the Fig. 3 ness of the applied particulates, TiC and TiB 2 have similar microhardness values in the range of about 30-33 GPa [20]. However, it is important to note that in sintered TiC-Mg 2 Si samples the prevailing reinforcing phases are in situ formed TiSi 2 , Ti 3 SiC 2 and SiC, providing improved hardness, particularly in combination with TiC and TiB 2 [21], while in liquid sintered TiB 2 -Mg 2 Si the hardness of the sintered species was additionally improved by the Mg 0.15 Si 0.85 bonding phase. Hence, the observed similarities in hardness values reported in Table 3 are mostly ascribed to the mutually interactive influences of various sintering paths on the microstructure of the resulting specimens: (1) reactive sintering, with the secondarily formed bonding phases (TiSi 2 and Ti 3 SiC 2 ) in samples reinforced with TiC; or (2) liquid sintering in samples reinforced with TiB 2 . Examination of the fracture toughness, Table 3, revealed that the toughness of sintered samples was in all cases inversely proportional to the initial amount of reinforcing phase. In other words, the reinforcement of an initially brittle Mg 2 Si matrix neither 56 ALUMINIUM · 12/2009

Fig. 4: Microstructure of pressurelessly sintered composite sample with the inital composition 90 vol. % Mg 2 Si and 10 vol. % TiB 2 Fig. 4a: XRD of the sample shown in the Fig. 4 the primary (TiC and TiB 2 ) or secondary in situ formed (TiSi 2 , Ti 3 SiC 2 and SiC) particulates additionally increased the brittleness of the composite species. Furthermore, the fracture toughness of liquid sintered Mg 2 Si- TiB 2 samples was slightly higher than in reactively sintered Mg 2 Si-TiC, most probably due to the presence of continuous Mg 0.15 Si 0.85 bonding phase. However, comparison of the fracture toughness of sintered and infiltrated samples, Table 2 and 3, revealed that toughness was significantly lower in sintered than in infiltrated counterparts, Table 2. A potential mechanism for the observed behaviour is an increase of the intrinsic toughness of Mg 2 Si-Mg-TiC samples mostly caused by the presence of the continuous, ductile Mg phase. In that case, toughness was enhanced by increasing the micro- ALUMINIUM · 12/2009 structural resistance and changing the nature of the matrix (from brittle to ductile) to suppress damage in the form of microcracking or microvoid formation ahead of the crack tip. In addition, TiC particles also toughened Mg 2 Si-Mg-TiC samples to some degree by crack bridging. This extrinsic toughening acts primarily behind the crack tip to effectively reduce the crack-driving force actually experienced at the crack tip. Analogous toughening in sintered samples (Mg 2 Si-TiC and Mg 2 Si-TiB 2 ) was considerably less developed, in part because such composites are designed with rather strong reinforcement-Mg 2 Si interfaces – and thus do not develop crack bridging to any significant degree. conclusions 1. Depending on the selected fabrication technique of (i) pressureless infiltration of porous Mg2Si-TiC and Mg- 2Si-TiB2 preforms with molten magnesium, or (ii) pressureless sintering of green Mg2Si-TiC and Mg2Si-TiB2 compacts, Mg2Si-based composites of different nature, microstructure and combination of properties were successfully synthesized. In addition, the effect of different microstructures developed in Mg2Si-based composites on improvement of their mechanical properties (strength, hardness and toughness) was investigated. 2. The pressureless infiltration of porous Mg2Si-TiC preforms with molten magnesium resulted in dense (≥ 95% T.D.) Mg-Mg2Si-TiC metal matrix composites with a metallic matrix discontinuously reinforced with Mg2Si and TiC particulates. 3. Under the same experimental conditions, the pressureless infiltration of porous Mg2Si-TiB2 preforms with molten magnesium was found to be unsuccessful. research 4. The pressureless sintering of green Mg2Si-TiC and Mg2Si-TiB2 compacts lead to the formation of almost fully dense (≥ 97% T.D.) intermetallic matrix composites with a Mg2Si matrix discontinuously reinforced with primarily introduced particles and different secondarily formed bonding phases. 5. In the case of Mg2Si-TiC samples, the formation of the secondary bonding phase was caused by chemical reactions between Mg2Si and TiC. Furthermore, the phase composition of the bonding phase obtained was found to be dependent on the initial volume fraction of TiC reinforcement. In samples with a lower TiC concentration (≤ 10 vol.%), the secondarily formed bonding phase consisted of TiSi2 and Si, while in samples with a higher TiC concentration (≥ 10 vol.%), the main constituents were TiSi2 and Ti3SiC2 and SiC. 6. The densification of Mg2Si-TiB2 proceeded via liquid sintering. During the early stage of densification, Mg2Si particles melted incongruently, forming a peritectic liquid phase which then wetted and well impregnated the individual Mg2Si and TiB2 particles in porous samples. On cooling, the liquid phase crystallized in the form of a continuous bonding phase with an average composition of Mg0.15Si0.85 , causing the complete densification of Mg2Si-TiB2 species. 7. The Mg-Mg2Si-TiC composite samples obtained by pressureless reactive infiltration of molten magnesium into a porous preform of Mg2Si with TiC ceramic reinforcement were tailored to consist of a continuous magnesium matrix discontinuously reinforced with Mg2Si and TiC. Such a design was selected in order to improve the fracture toughness of the composite, thus creating an ultra-light structural material with excellent tensile properties (Young’s modulus ➝ Initial composition (vol. %) Retained porosity (%) Density (g/cm3 ) E (GPa) Tensile strength (MPa) Vickers Hardness (GPa) KIC (MPa m1/2 ) Mg2Si+10%TiC 1.8±0.2 2.25±0.1 132±13 487±49 9.1±1 1.9±0.2 Mg2Si+20%TiC 2.2±0.2 2.53±0.1 141±14 532±53 9.9±1 1.7±0.2 Mg2Si+30%TiC 2.4±0.2 2.78±0.1 149±14 564±53 10.7±1 1.5±0.2 Mg2Si+40%TiC 3.0±0.2 3.03±0.1 157±14 596±53 11.4±1 1.4±0.1 Mg2Si+10%TiB2 2.3±0.2 2.22±0.1 134±13 477±48 9.6±1 2.3±0.2 Mg2Si+20%TiB2 2.9±0.3 2.43±0.2 146±15 528±53 10.3±1 1.8±0.2 Table 3: Average room temperature tensile properties and Vickers hardness of pressureless sintered composite samples 57

Fig. 4: Microstructure of pressurelessly<br />

sintered composite sample with the inital<br />

composition 90 vol. % Mg 2 Si and 10 vol.<br />

% TiB 2<br />

Fig. 4a: XRD of the sample shown in the<br />

Fig. 4<br />

the primary (TiC and TiB 2 ) or secondary<br />

in situ formed (TiSi 2 , Ti 3 SiC 2<br />

and SiC) particulates additionally increased<br />

the brittleness of the composite<br />

species. Furthermore, the fracture<br />

toughness of liquid sintered Mg 2 Si-<br />

TiB 2 samples was slightly higher than<br />

in reactively sintered Mg 2 Si-TiC, most<br />

probably due to the presence of continuous<br />

Mg 0.15 Si 0.85 bonding phase.<br />

However, comparison of the fracture<br />

toughness of sintered and infiltrated<br />

samples, Table 2 and 3, revealed that<br />

toughness was significantly lower in<br />

sintered than in infiltrated counterparts,<br />

Table 2.<br />

A potential mechanism for the observed<br />

behaviour is an increase of the<br />

intrinsic toughness of Mg 2 Si-Mg-TiC<br />

samples mostly caused by the presence<br />

of the continuous, ductile Mg<br />

phase. In that case, toughness was<br />

enhanced by increasing the micro-<br />

<strong>ALU</strong>MINIUM · 12/2009<br />

structural resistance and changing<br />

the nature of the matrix (from brittle<br />

to ductile) to suppress damage in the<br />

form of microcracking or microvoid<br />

formation ahead of the crack tip. In<br />

addition, TiC particles also toughened<br />

Mg 2 Si-Mg-TiC samples to some<br />

degree by crack bridging. This extrinsic<br />

toughening acts primarily behind<br />

the crack tip to effectively reduce the<br />

crack-driving force actually experienced<br />

at the crack tip.<br />

Analogous toughening in sintered<br />

samples (Mg 2 Si-TiC and Mg 2 Si-TiB 2 )<br />

was considerably less developed, in<br />

part because such composites are designed<br />

with rather strong reinforcement-Mg<br />

2 Si interfaces – and thus do<br />

not develop crack bridging to any significant<br />

degree.<br />

conclusions<br />

1. Depending on the selected fabrication<br />

technique of (i) pressureless infiltration<br />

of porous Mg2Si-TiC and Mg-<br />

2Si-TiB2 preforms with molten magnesium,<br />

or (ii) pressureless sintering<br />

of green Mg2Si-TiC and Mg2Si-TiB2 compacts, Mg2Si-based composites<br />

of different nature, microstructure<br />

and combination of properties were<br />

successfully synthesized. In addition,<br />

the effect of different microstructures<br />

developed in Mg2Si-based composites<br />

on improvement of their mechanical<br />

properties (strength, hardness and<br />

toughness) was investigated.<br />

2. The pressureless infiltration<br />

of porous Mg2Si-TiC preforms with<br />

molten magnesium resulted in dense<br />

(≥ 95% T.D.) Mg-Mg2Si-TiC metal<br />

matrix composites with a metallic matrix<br />

discontinuously reinforced with<br />

Mg2Si and TiC particulates.<br />

3. Under the same experimental<br />

conditions, the pressureless infiltration<br />

of porous Mg2Si-TiB2 preforms<br />

with molten magnesium was found to<br />

be unsuccessful.<br />

research<br />

4. The pressureless sintering of green<br />

Mg2Si-TiC and Mg2Si-TiB2 compacts<br />

lead to the formation of almost fully<br />

dense (≥ 97% T.D.) intermetallic matrix<br />

composites with a Mg2Si matrix<br />

discontinuously reinforced with primarily<br />

introduced particles and different<br />

secondarily formed bonding<br />

phases.<br />

5. In the case of Mg2Si-TiC samples,<br />

the formation of the secondary<br />

bonding phase was caused by chemical<br />

reactions between Mg2Si and TiC.<br />

Furthermore, the phase composition<br />

of the bonding phase obtained was<br />

found to be dependent on the initial<br />

volume fraction of TiC reinforcement.<br />

In samples with a lower TiC concentration<br />

(≤ 10 vol.%), the secondarily<br />

formed bonding phase consisted of<br />

TiSi2 and Si, while in samples with a<br />

higher TiC concentration (≥ 10 vol.%),<br />

the main constituents were TiSi2 and<br />

Ti3SiC2 and SiC.<br />

6. The densification of Mg2Si-TiB2 proceeded via liquid sintering. During<br />

the early stage of densification, Mg2Si particles melted incongruently, forming<br />

a peritectic liquid phase which<br />

then wetted and well impregnated the<br />

individual Mg2Si and TiB2 particles in<br />

porous samples. On cooling, the liquid<br />

phase crystallized in the form of<br />

a continuous bonding phase with an<br />

average composition of Mg0.15Si0.85 ,<br />

causing the complete densification of<br />

Mg2Si-TiB2 species.<br />

7. The Mg-Mg2Si-TiC composite<br />

samples obtained by pressureless<br />

reactive infiltration of molten magnesium<br />

into a porous preform of Mg2Si with TiC ceramic reinforcement were<br />

tailored to consist of a continuous<br />

magnesium matrix discontinuously<br />

reinforced with Mg2Si and TiC. Such<br />

a design was selected in order to improve<br />

the fracture toughness of the<br />

composite, thus creating an ultra-light<br />

structural material with excellent tensile<br />

properties (Young’s modulus ➝<br />

Initial composition (vol. %) Retained porosity (%) Density (g/cm3 ) E (GPa) Tensile strength (MPa) Vickers Hardness (GPa) KIC (MPa m1/2 )<br />

Mg2Si+10%TiC 1.8±0.2 2.25±0.1 132±13 487±49 9.1±1 1.9±0.2<br />

Mg2Si+20%TiC 2.2±0.2 2.53±0.1 141±14 532±53 9.9±1 1.7±0.2<br />

Mg2Si+30%TiC 2.4±0.2 2.78±0.1 149±14 564±53 10.7±1 1.5±0.2<br />

Mg2Si+40%TiC 3.0±0.2 3.03±0.1 157±14 596±53 11.4±1 1.4±0.1<br />

Mg2Si+10%TiB2 2.3±0.2 2.22±0.1 134±13 477±48 9.6±1 2.3±0.2<br />

Mg2Si+20%TiB2 2.9±0.3 2.43±0.2 146±15 528±53 10.3±1 1.8±0.2<br />

Table 3: Average room temperature tensile properties and Vickers hardness of pressureless sintered composite samples<br />

57

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!