Nicola Arndt und Matthias Pohl - Neobiota
Nicola Arndt und Matthias Pohl - Neobiota Nicola Arndt und Matthias Pohl - Neobiota
Tabellen mit Tausenden von Aufnahmen, umfassend und schnell bearbeitet werden. Nun werden die Voraussetzungen geschaffen, ein solches Informations-System für ganz Europa aufzubauen. Die einzelnen Grundbausteine stehen bereits zur Verfügung, nämlich eine hierarchische Gliederung der Vegetationseinheiten für Europa, eine entsprechende Gliederung in Landschaftstypen und ein Netz von Vegetationsaufnahmen. Alle drei Bausteine sollen in einer europäischen Datenbank zusammengeführt werden. Grundlage für die Gliederung in Landschaftstypen ist die Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas. In diesem Informations-System wird jedoch nicht nur die naturnahe Natur in Europa berücksichtigt, sondern auch die vom Menschen beeinflußte und gestaltete Natur, wie sie vor allem noch in alten Kulturlandschaften anzutreffen ist. 1 Introduction In Europe, phytosociology has a relatively long tradition. In the beginning, that is in the first half of the nineteenth century, vegetation science was not a separate branch of science but a part of phytogeography. Famous researchers of this time, such as Alexander VON HUMBOLDT, proposed different vegetation classifications based on their knowledge of the interrelationships of species and their ecological characteristics. These classifications however were entirely qualitative and based on impressions gathered during their travels. Logically, in the second half of the nineteenth and the first decades of the twentieth century, a quantitative method was developed. This method consists of the analysis of the vegetation in relatively small samples in the field (relevés), after which the data can be analysed at the desk. In the Netherlands, the first relevés were probably made in 1929 by Josias BRAUN-BLANQUET and Carel Willem DE LEEUW. However, the first syntaxonomical outline was published already in 1937, the same year in which TÜXEN published his ‘Pflanzengesellschaften Nordwestdeutschlands’. This first Dutch outline was only a small work of 18 pages in French, written by VLIEGER, but it already summarized the most important alliances. Some years later, it was followed by the first overviews to treat vegetation at the level of individual associations, to which a group of phytosociological researchers contributed with many relevés. This overview included no tables, but the floristic composition of the plant communities was critically examined (WESTHOFF et al. 1942, 1946). Although the classical work of WESTHOFF & DEN HELD, published in 1969, included no tables, many handmade tables were used for this synopsis; however, a comprehensive numerical analysis of the data was not possible. At the end of the eighties such analysis methods became possible by the use of the personal computer and the development of specific software. Started around the same time, thousands of relevés (currently over 350,000) began to be collected within the framework of a revision of the plant communities of the Netherlands. This collection comprised not only recent relevés, but also very many historical ones from the forties, fifties and sixties (SCHAMINÉE & VAN ‘T VEER 2000). This project was carried out with the financial support of the governmental Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Nature Protection, and was completed only two years ago with the publication of the fifth and last volume of the series ‘De Vegetatie van Nederland’, comprising the tall forb, shrub and woodland communities (STORTELDER et al. 1999; see SCHAMINÉE 2000). The earlier volumes deal with aquatic plant communities, swamps and wet heathlands (vol. 2: SCHAMINÉE et al. 1995), meadows, edge communities and dry heathlands (vol. 3: SCHAMINÉE et al. 1996) and pioneer vegetation and coastal 348
areas (vol. 4: SCHAMINÉE et al. 1998). The first volume (SCHAMINÉE et al. 1995) includes a treatment of the fundamentals, methods and practical application of phytosociology. In the last decades, a clear development can be observed in vegetation science, in which the main points are repositioned. Instead of description and classification, the functioning of plant communities has become the more central theme. In this, experiences of landscape ecology, ecohydrology and experimental ecology are widely used. More recently, attempts have been made to integrate the results of different disciplines in computer models or information systems. An example of such an information system is SYNBIOSYS, a programme that is under development in the Netherlands and which may serve as an example for the development of such an information system on the European level. 2 SYNBIOSYS Netherlands Besides the revision of the plant communities and the synthesis of a national electronic database with relevés, some other projects have had an enormous influence on the knowledge and documentation of the vegetation in this country. In a joint undertaking of vegetation and soil scientists, the precise link between vegetation and environment was examined for all woodland communities (STORTELDER et al. 1998; WOLF et al. 2001). A second project dealt with the development of interesting biotopes, starting from intensively used agricultural grasslands and fields. Not only for vegetation, but also for certain animal groups (butterflies, birds), succession schemes were made and interpreted by means of changes in environmental factors (SCHAMINÉE & JANSEN 1998, 2001). The third project concerns the distribution of vegetation types. Recently, the first volume of this project was published in a series entitled ‘Atlas van plantengemeenschappen in Nederland’ (WEEDA et al. 2000). In this series, the historical and current distribution of the plant communities as treated in the already mentioned national overview is shown. The results and data of these extensive projects required new analysis tools, which led to the development of SYNBIOSYS. SYNBIOSYS is an acronym of ‘Syntaxonomisch Biologisch Systeem’, making clear that classifications are the foundation of the system (HENNEKENS et al. 2001). Since biocoenoses are the objective of the system, classifications are necessary to organize these in a systematic way. SYNBIOSYS has two of these classification levels: the plant community and the landscape (Figures 1a, 1b). The level of the plant community relies on the new national classification of plant communities of the Netherlands (SCHAMINÉE et al. 1995-1998; STORTELDER et al. 1999). The classification of landscapes is based on a newly developed hierarchical classification, in which the highest level coincides with the division into physiogeographical regions, and the third and lowest level with the division into so-called physiotopes (BAL et al. 1995; STORTELDER et al. 1998). For every physiotope the patterns and processes of the vegetation complexes are described. The national vegetation databank with over 350,000 relevés is the foundation of the system, together with the vegetation tables that stem from these relevés. The core of SYNBIOSYS is however the presence of identification software, with which the user can examine his own relevés and tables and easily compare these with the tables of the national classification. In the information system, diagrams, maps and tables are only partly fixed, which makes the system very flexible and always up-to-date. The Dutch version of SYNBIOSYS consists of three parts. In the first, encyclopaedic, part, the results of the above mentioned projects are included. For example, this part comprises the complete 349
- Seite 300 und 301: potential natural phytodiversity. D
- Seite 302 und 303: • Im Ergebnis der vor allem durch
- Seite 304 und 305: Abb. 2: Auf der Grundlage der Stich
- Seite 306 und 307: 5 Die Übereinstimmung der Baumarte
- Seite 308 und 309: 306 Abb. 6: Aktuelle Vegetation (li
- Seite 310 und 311: wären die pi für alle Arten gleic
- Seite 312 und 313: Bewirtschaftungsformen in der Verga
- Seite 314 und 315: 7 Die Quantifizierung der Ökosyste
- Seite 316 und 317: JENSSEN, M. & HOFMANN, G. (1996): D
- Seite 319 und 320: Anwendung und Auswertung der Karte
- Seite 321 und 322: eine Verbreitungskarte erstellt wer
- Seite 323 und 324: In unserer Betrachtung soll der Hö
- Seite 325 und 326: % Arten 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 A
- Seite 327 und 328: 2. ALPEN - ANGRENZENDE GEB. a) ALP-
- Seite 329 und 330: Tabelle 2: Verteilung der wichtigst
- Seite 331 und 332: % der Arten 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
- Seite 333 und 334: Literatur ADLER, W.; OSWALD K. & FI
- Seite 335 und 336: MEUSEL, H.; JÄGER, E.J. & WEINERT,
- Seite 337 und 338: Anwendung und Auswertung der Karte
- Seite 339 und 340: Abb. 1: Klimadiagramme ausgewählte
- Seite 341 und 342: (S. graeca, S. hajastana u. a.) und
- Seite 343 und 344: Die Kräuterfluren besiedeln vorwie
- Seite 345 und 346: Picea orientalis gehört zur Sektio
- Seite 347: Anschrift des Autors: Prof. Dr. Gio
- Seite 352 und 353: Figure 1a/Figure 1b: The Dutch vers
- Seite 354 und 355: (2) Already in 1994, the computer p
- Seite 356 und 357: types, the computerized links betwe
- Seite 358 und 359: MUCINA, L.; RODWELL, J.S.; SCHAMIN
- Seite 361: Anwendung der Europakarte bei der W
- Seite 364 und 365: secondary in origin but include sta
- Seite 366 und 367: Table 2: Potential forest types occ
- Seite 368 und 369: available, in part for social reaso
- Seite 370 und 371: Table 3: Principal potential forest
- Seite 373 und 374: Application and Analysis of the Map
- Seite 375 und 376: Sometimes, where there is comprehen
- Seite 377 und 378: Figure 3: Woodlands and their repla
- Seite 379 und 380: 25% 6% 0% 1% 2% 1% 4% 0% 19% 42% U7
- Seite 381: Darwen Parkway and Outwood projects
- Seite 385 und 386: Anwendung und Auswertung der Karte
- Seite 387 und 388: of natural oak regeneration (e.g.,
- Seite 389 und 390: Im vorliegenden Beitrag steht die V
- Seite 391 und 392: Abb. 1: Birken-Pionierwald mit eind
- Seite 393 und 394: Wollgras- Torfmoos-KI-Typ naß Torf
- Seite 395 und 396: (EI-)KI Hylocom.-Vaccin. KI Hylocom
- Seite 397 und 398: ausgewiesene ostdeutsche Gebiete we
- Seite 399 und 400: BOHN, U.; GOLLUB, G. & HETTWER, C.
areas (vol. 4: SCHAMINÉE et al. 1998). The first volume (SCHAMINÉE et al. 1995) includes a treatment<br />
of the f<strong>und</strong>amentals, methods and practical application of phytosociology.<br />
In the last decades, a clear development can be observed in vegetation science, in which the main<br />
points are repositioned. Instead of description and classification, the functioning of plant communities<br />
has become the more central theme. In this, experiences of landscape ecology, ecohydrology and<br />
experimental ecology are widely used. More recently, attempts have been made to integrate the results<br />
of different disciplines in computer models or information systems. An example of such an<br />
information system is SYNBIOSYS, a programme that is <strong>und</strong>er development in the Netherlands and<br />
which may serve as an example for the development of such an information system on the European<br />
level.<br />
2 SYNBIOSYS Netherlands<br />
Besides the revision of the plant communities and the synthesis of a national electronic database with<br />
relevés, some other projects have had an enormous influence on the knowledge and documentation of<br />
the vegetation in this country. In a joint <strong>und</strong>ertaking of vegetation and soil scientists, the precise link<br />
between vegetation and environment was examined for all woodland communities (STORTELDER et al.<br />
1998; WOLF et al. 2001). A second project dealt with the development of interesting biotopes, starting<br />
from intensively used agricultural grasslands and fields. Not only for vegetation, but also for certain<br />
animal groups (butterflies, birds), succession schemes were made and interpreted by means of changes<br />
in environmental factors (SCHAMINÉE & JANSEN 1998, 2001). The third project concerns the<br />
distribution of vegetation types. Recently, the first volume of this project was published in a series<br />
entitled ‘Atlas van plantengemeenschappen in Nederland’ (WEEDA et al. 2000). In this series, the<br />
historical and current distribution of the plant communities as treated in the already mentioned<br />
national overview is shown. The results and data of these extensive projects required new analysis<br />
tools, which led to the development of SYNBIOSYS.<br />
SYNBIOSYS is an acronym of ‘Syntaxonomisch Biologisch Systeem’, making clear that<br />
classifications are the fo<strong>und</strong>ation of the system (HENNEKENS et al. 2001). Since biocoenoses are the<br />
objective of the system, classifications are necessary to organize these in a systematic way.<br />
SYNBIOSYS has two of these classification levels: the plant community and the landscape (Figures<br />
1a, 1b). The level of the plant community relies on the new national classification of plant<br />
communities of the Netherlands (SCHAMINÉE et al. 1995-1998; STORTELDER et al. 1999). The<br />
classification of landscapes is based on a newly developed hierarchical classification, in which the<br />
highest level coincides with the division into physiogeographical regions, and the third and lowest<br />
level with the division into so-called physiotopes (BAL et al. 1995; STORTELDER et al. 1998). For<br />
every physiotope the patterns and processes of the vegetation complexes are described. The national<br />
vegetation databank with over 350,000 relevés is the fo<strong>und</strong>ation of the system, together with the<br />
vegetation tables that stem from these relevés. The core of SYNBIOSYS is however the presence of<br />
identification software, with which the user can examine his own relevés and tables and easily<br />
compare these with the tables of the national classification. In the information system, diagrams, maps<br />
and tables are only partly fixed, which makes the system very flexible and always up-to-date.<br />
The Dutch version of SYNBIOSYS consists of three parts. In the first, encyclopaedic, part, the results<br />
of the above mentioned projects are included. For example, this part comprises the complete<br />
349