Nicola Arndt und Matthias Pohl - Neobiota
Nicola Arndt und Matthias Pohl - Neobiota Nicola Arndt und Matthias Pohl - Neobiota
Code Formation/Mapping Unit Area in the Caucasus (km Protected 2 ) territory (%) M4 steppes Transcaucasian altimontane herb-grass steppes 5,890 2.1 M5 West and central Pontic lowland-colline herb-grass steppes 15,480 0 M11 Pre- and Transcaucasian montane Stipa-steppes 31,900 6.6 M13 Central Pontic grass steppes 21,190 0 M13a – in combination with vegetation on solonetz soils 3,540 0 M16 West and central Pontic desert steppes 2,020 0 M17 Northwest Caspian psammophytic desert steppes 6,480 0 M18a Northwest Caspian desert steppes on solonetz soils 20,780 0 M21 North Caspian halophytic desert steppes 2,140 0 N Oreoxerophytic vegetation 6,220 2.6 N5 Greater Caucasian thorn-cushion communities 2,470 2.2 N6 East Transcaucasian thorn-cushion vegetation and tomillares 470 0.06 N7 South Transcaucasian thorn-cushion vegetation and tomillares 2,760 3.8 N8 Talysh thorn-cushion vegetation 520 0 O Deserts 43,940 0.7 O4b var. of Caspian hemipsammophytic grass-wormwood deserts 1,290 0 O5b var. of Caspian psammophytic wormwood desert series 1,250 0 O6c var. of Caspian psammophytic shrub-wormwood desert series 3,380 0 O7 East Transcaucasian wormwood deserts 18,090 0.7 O8 East Transcaucasian Salsola-deserts 3,540 0.7 O9 East Transcaucasian halophytic Salsola dendroides- deserts 14,320 0.8 O10 East Transcaucasian halophytic wormwood deserts 2,070 3.4 P Coastal vegetation and inland halophytic vegetation 10,650 3.2 P15 West to central Pontic sand-dune vegetation complexes 150 0 P16 West Caspian sand-dune vegetation complexes 2,370 8.2 P31 North Caspian halophytic vegetation 3,530 0 P35 North Caspian halophytic vegetation on solonchak 980 0 P36 East Transcaucasian halophytic vegetation on solonchak 3,620 4.1 R Tall Reed vegetation and tall sedge swamps, aquatic vegetation 12,110 1.4 R1 Freshwater tall reed swamps 4,690 3.6 R2 Shallow water vegetation complexes 3,290 0 R3 Brackish water tall reed swamps alternating with salt meadows 4,130 0 S Mires 90 6.7 S26 Colchic herb-rich tall sedge fens and Sphagnum-mires 90 6.7 T Swamp and fen forests 770 23.4 T3 Colchic alder carrs in combination with alluvial forests 770 23.4 U Vegetation of flood-plains 12,860 0.2 U21 Pre-Caucasian hardwood alluvial forests 10,560 0 U22 Transcaucasian hardwood alluvial forests 2,300 1.1 Total/Average 449,610 3.0 Area VI is a special concentration area for Colchic relicts and endemics (among them the local endemics Epigaea gaultherioides, Rhododendron ungernii, Rh. smirnowii, Betula medwediewii, etc.). The area is rich in forests, and is significant in terms of the Lesser Caucasus wildlife corridor and for the perspectives of development of transborder conservation. There are no units with indicator values Area VII covers a big part of Javakheti-Armenian uplands and part of the River Arax Gorge. The area is significant for mountain wetlands and diversity of high mountain and xerophytic/hemi-xerophytic vegetation, as well as for corresponding fauna diversity. The area coincides with one of the bird 256
migrating routes lying across the Caucasus. B58, C46, F164, F172, M4, O7, O8 and P36 have less than 5 % of their territory in protected areas. The area is under strong human impact. Area VIII encompasses the extreme southern, arid part of the Caucasus. It is distinguished by the diversity of high mountain vegetation, xerophytes and its large mammal fauna. Here B59 and C47 have zero representation, while units with less than 5 % representation are F170, F172 and O7. Recent data on human impact are not available. Area IX covers the area of the Talysh Mountains’ part of Hyrcanian refugia. Almost all units are characteristic of the lowest index value: H2, H3, F166, F170, N8. The area suffers from serious human impact. 2 5 Conclusions It is clear from the preliminary and rather approximate analyses that the Caucasus Protected Areas network calls for improvement. Planning of the Econet by considering all necessary parameters (the implementation of which has been already attempted by WWF) is rather time-consuming and requires much financial support. But until these plans have been implemented, it is obvious that urgent measures should be carried out for conservation of the following natural habitats and areas. (a) Measures should be taken throughout the Caucasus for surviving floodplain forest (formation U) remnants. (b) Special attention should be focused to the survival of oak forests in the Caucasus. Furthermore, urgent measures should be taken for surviving formations H and G remnants, as well as for expanding the protection of units F166-F168, F170-F172. While prioritising the oak forest conservation needs, the Areas IX, III, VII and VIII should be also considered. (c) Protection of all three units of formation R should be given priority; also special attention should be focused on the Areas I and IV. (d) Urgent measures should be carried out for expanding protected areas in the Talysh Mountains (area IX) (see corresponding reference on previous page). (e) Development of the protected territory in Areas III and V will balance the network existing in the Great Caucasus and will create a good opportunity for establishing wide transborder cooperation and for creating a “Great Caucasus Green Corridor”. (f) Establishment of protected areas within the framework of Area IX will guarantee the survival of local Colchic relict endemic species and communities. (g) Establishment of a protected territory in Areas VII and VIII is absolutely necessary for perfecting the network of southern Caucasus and for survival of forest formations (especially F164, F170, F172), subalpine forests (part of C46, C47), high mountain wetlands, large mammals and ornithofauna, here threatened with extinction. 2 Recently, the Hyrcan Strict Nature Reserve (with an area less than 3,000 ha) was replaced by Hyrcan National Park (21,435 ha), established according to decree of the President of Azerbaijan (February, 2004). WWF is assisting the Azeri Government in the preparation of a management plan and providing core support for implementation of infrastructure. 257
- Seite 207 und 208: Application and Analysis of the Map
- Seite 209 und 210: landforms, vegetation and plant spe
- Seite 211 und 212: types, in conjunction with ecologic
- Seite 213 und 214: The inclusion of Nordic vegetation
- Seite 215 und 216: In the systems of Palaearctic Habit
- Seite 217 und 218: Anwendung und Auswertung der Karte
- Seite 219 und 220: Landschaftsschutzgebiet (LSG): weit
- Seite 221 und 222: oder Ersatzgesellschaften, und zwar
- Seite 223 und 224: und LSG Křivoklátsko, das Cephala
- Seite 225 und 226: Nr. der KE Wissenschaftlicher Name
- Seite 227: NEUHÄUSLOVÁ, Z. (1997): Fytocenol
- Seite 230 und 231: Planung benutzt. Eine Kurzfassung,
- Seite 232 und 233: 3 Schutzmaßnahmen zum Erhalt der n
- Seite 235 und 236: Anwendung und Auswertung der Karte
- Seite 237 und 238: Was die regionale Stetigkeit betrif
- Seite 239 und 240: Nr. Einheit Schutzgebiete 49 K12 5,
- Seite 241 und 242: Abb. 1: Hochlagen über 1900 m NN (
- Seite 243 und 244: Abb. 3: Reste von Traubeneichen-Zer
- Seite 245 und 246: Die Auenwälder an den Flüssen Cer
- Seite 247 und 248: ausgenommen ein hochstämmiger Best
- Seite 249 und 250: PEDROTTI, F. (1996): Suddivisioni b
- Seite 251 und 252: Nr. Einheit V E FVG VE LO PIE LAZ A
- Seite 253 und 254: Application and Analysis of the Map
- Seite 255 und 256: strategically-planned network of pr
- Seite 257: Table 1: Conservation proportion of
- Seite 261 und 262: Map 2: Vegetation units with less t
- Seite 263: Author’s address: Nugzar Zazanash
- Seite 266 und 267: ökologie und im Naturschutz auf na
- Seite 268 und 269: misch zuordnen lassen (vgl. auch DI
- Seite 270 und 271: Tabelle 1: Flächenstatistik der Ka
- Seite 272 und 273: 4 Gegenüberstellung der Kartierung
- Seite 274 und 275: gen die weit verbreiteten artenarme
- Seite 276 und 277: BUNDESAMT FÜR NATURSCHUTZ (BFN) [H
- Seite 279 und 280: Anwendung und Auswertung der Karte
- Seite 281 und 282: und Parallelisierung von Art und In
- Seite 283 und 284: Tabelle 2: Skala der Mosaiktypen de
- Seite 285: Anschrift des Autors: Dr. rer. nat.
- Seite 288 und 289: aktuellen Vorherrrschen der landwir
- Seite 290 und 291: Figure 2: Potential natural vegetat
- Seite 292 und 293: Also the sand dune unit, P5: the no
- Seite 294 und 295: Nearly all vegetation units in the
- Seite 296 und 297: In the natural vegetation, species
- Seite 298 und 299: BUCHWALD, E.; HONORE, S.; JØRGENSE
- Seite 300 und 301: potential natural phytodiversity. D
- Seite 302 und 303: • Im Ergebnis der vor allem durch
- Seite 304 und 305: Abb. 2: Auf der Grundlage der Stich
- Seite 306 und 307: 5 Die Übereinstimmung der Baumarte
migrating routes lying across the Caucasus. B58, C46, F164, F172, M4, O7, O8 and P36 have less<br />
than 5 % of their territory in protected areas. The area is <strong>und</strong>er strong human impact.<br />
Area VIII encompasses the extreme southern, arid part of the Caucasus. It is distinguished by the<br />
diversity of high mountain vegetation, xerophytes and its large mammal fauna. Here B59 and C47<br />
have zero representation, while units with less than 5 % representation are F170, F172 and O7. Recent<br />
data on human impact are not available.<br />
Area IX covers the area of the Talysh Mountains’ part of Hyrcanian refugia. Almost all units are<br />
characteristic of the lowest index value: H2, H3, F166, F170, N8. The area suffers from serious human<br />
impact. 2<br />
5 Conclusions<br />
It is clear from the preliminary and rather approximate analyses that the Caucasus Protected Areas<br />
network calls for improvement.<br />
Planning of the Econet by considering all necessary parameters (the implementation of which has been<br />
already attempted by WWF) is rather time-consuming and requires much financial support. But until<br />
these plans have been implemented, it is obvious that urgent measures should be carried out for<br />
conservation of the following natural habitats and areas.<br />
(a) Measures should be taken throughout the Caucasus for surviving floodplain forest (formation U)<br />
remnants.<br />
(b) Special attention should be focused to the survival of oak forests in the Caucasus. Furthermore,<br />
urgent measures should be taken for surviving formations H and G remnants, as well as for expanding<br />
the protection of units F166-F168, F170-F172. While prioritising the oak forest conservation needs,<br />
the Areas IX, III, VII and VIII should be also considered.<br />
(c) Protection of all three units of formation R should be given priority; also special attention should<br />
be focused on the Areas I and IV.<br />
(d) Urgent measures should be carried out for expanding protected areas in the Talysh Mountains (area<br />
IX) (see corresponding reference on previous page).<br />
(e) Development of the protected territory in Areas III and V will balance the network existing in the<br />
Great Caucasus and will create a good opportunity for establishing wide transborder cooperation and<br />
for creating a “Great Caucasus Green Corridor”.<br />
(f) Establishment of protected areas within the framework of Area IX will guarantee the survival of<br />
local Colchic relict endemic species and communities.<br />
(g) Establishment of a protected territory in Areas VII and VIII is absolutely necessary for perfecting<br />
the network of southern Caucasus and for survival of forest formations (especially F164, F170, F172),<br />
subalpine forests (part of C46, C47), high mountain wetlands, large mammals and ornithofauna, here<br />
threatened with extinction.<br />
2 Recently, the Hyrcan Strict Nature Reserve (with an area less than 3,000 ha) was replaced by Hyrcan National<br />
Park (21,435 ha), established according to decree of the President of Azerbaijan (February, 2004). WWF is<br />
assisting the Azeri Government in the preparation of a management plan and providing core support for<br />
implementation of infrastructure.<br />
257