Nicola Arndt und Matthias Pohl - Neobiota
Nicola Arndt und Matthias Pohl - Neobiota Nicola Arndt und Matthias Pohl - Neobiota
100 Map 7: European Landscape Typology and Map, Draft Version (LANMAP 1)
DTM Definition Name 1 0-100 m Lowland (L) 2 100-500 m Hills (C) 3 500-1500 m Mountains (M) 4 1500-2500 m High mountains (H) 5 2500 + m Alpine (A) LC Definition Name 2arable land a 3 permanent crops p 4pastures g 5 heterogeneous agric. h 6forest f 7shrubs s 8 open spaces b 9wetlands w Extra codes 6000 = Non-Classified 6001 = Urban 6002 = Inland water 6003 = Estuaries and Lagoons PM Definition Name 1 River and Marine Alluvium A 3 Glacio-fluvial deposits I 4 Calcareous rocks C 5 Soft clayey materials L 6 Hard clayey materials and siltstone H 7Sands S 8 Sandstone R 9 Soft loam T 11 Detrital formations D 12 Crystalline rocks and Magmatites G 13 Volcanic rocks V 14 Other rocks X 15 Organic materials O Example type: LOg Figure 3: Construction and symbology of the typology based on topography (DTM), parent material (PM) and land cover (LC) for LANMAP 1. The main rational for the selection of vegetation classes has been the consideration that different types and locations of forest communities provide the opportunity to get a first impression on how their boundaries related to landscape units as identified in LANMAP 1. The selection of specific types was done at random. The overall impression from the comparison presented in Maps 8/9 is a rather good resemblance between major mapping units throughout most of the areas. Obviously, the aggregated colour-scheme of the Natural Vegetation Map only appears to have less detail – since only a portion of Europe has been selected (370 mapping units out of 700 are represented), there are almost twice as many as the 202 landscape types depicted in LANMAP 1. A visual analysis of the boundaries between mapping units point at a large degree of resemblance between vegetation and landscape units. Given the fact that for assessments, soil data and topography was playing a key role for the identification of area units, this resemblance does not come as surprise. With regard to reliability and accuracy of soil unit boundaries, it must be assumed that the Natural Vegetation Map is possibly based on more detailed and better researched national and regional sources, while LANMAP 1 is exclusively relying on a subset of the European Soil Database. The selected vegetation units demonstrate that both maps must be considered as largely complimentary. The CORINE land cover information introduces more variety and entirely different characteristics to what once have been largely homogenous vegetation covers – especially with regard to Europe’s original dense forest cover. In most cases, the former forest vegetation such as the Atlantic and Aquitaine oak forests, but also the Central European sessile oak-hornbeam forests have been replaced in most lowlands by agricultural land use. A conspicuous exception is the extensive forest in Southwest France (Landes, south of valley of the Garonne and its affluents). However, the original Aquitaine pedunculate oak forests have been replaced by large plantations of Pinus pinaster, established for resin extraction. The heath landscape of Aquitane was afforested in order to fix the 101
- Seite 51 und 52: Abb. 5: Karte der landschaftsökolo
- Seite 53 und 54: Die Analyse der geostatistischen Re
- Seite 55 und 56: DINTER, W. (1999): Naturräumliche
- Seite 57 und 58: Application and Analysis of the Map
- Seite 59 und 60: 2 FAO Requirements Many environment
- Seite 61 und 62: In practical terms, delineation of
- Seite 63 und 64: 3.3 FAO Global Ecological Zone clas
- Seite 65 und 66: Table 2: LUT for Europe, showing th
- Seite 67 und 68: forests (F), 7 subgroups (F1- F7) h
- Seite 69 und 70: Figure 2: Map of Global Ecological
- Seite 71: Annex Table 4: Source maps used for
- Seite 74 und 75: DMEER-Projekt (Digitale Karte der
- Seite 76 und 77: Figure 1: The ecoregions are catego
- Seite 78 und 79: An example of the relationship betw
- Seite 80 und 81: DASMANN, R.F. (1973): A system for
- Seite 82 und 83: THACKWAY, R. & CRESSWELL, I.D. (eds
- Seite 84 und 85: 1 Background 1.1 Increasing interes
- Seite 86 und 87: While regional and national activit
- Seite 88 und 89: forest systems are supposed to reac
- Seite 90 und 91: According to SCHLÜTER (1991), hete
- Seite 92 und 93: derived from an analysis of soils a
- Seite 94 und 95: Map 1: Landscape Character Areas of
- Seite 96 und 97: in terms of successions and replace
- Seite 98 und 99: Map 5: Landscape map of Europe by M
- Seite 100 und 101: Russia. Information on rural land u
- Seite 104 und 105: G.3.1/37 F.1.1/7 & F 1 2/15 F.1.1/8
- Seite 106 und 107: Map 10: Comparison of the vegetatio
- Seite 108 und 109: 106 Map 11: Landscape Typology and
- Seite 110 und 111: � Natural vegetation data will al
- Seite 112 und 113: LUC (1999): Glasgow and the Clyde V
- Seite 115 und 116: Application and Analysis of the Map
- Seite 117 und 118: characterized by zonal vegetation i
- Seite 119 und 120: Table 1: FAO Global Ecological Zoni
- Seite 121 und 122: The name of each type includes the
- Seite 123: References LAVRENKO E.M. (1964): Al
- Seite 126 und 127: 1 Introduction A dominant feature i
- Seite 128 und 129: 10° 65° 70° SBZ 75° MBZ 42 20°
- Seite 130 und 131: As shown in Table 2 there is a good
- Seite 132 und 133: What is interesting is that the tem
- Seite 134 und 135: the driest (like Ulmus and Corylus
- Seite 137: Gliederung und Inhalte einzelner Fo
- Seite 140 und 141: 1 Gliederung der borealen Wälder D
- Seite 142 und 143: Die Assoziation Empetro nigri-Pinet
- Seite 144 und 145: WOJTERSKI, T. (1964): Bory sosnowe
- Seite 146 und 147: Attempts to characterize and delimi
- Seite 148 und 149: The schematic map presented here ca
- Seite 150 und 151: edrawing of the limits between rais
100<br />
Map 7: European Landscape Typology and Map, Draft Version (LANMAP 1)
Change language