09.07.2015 Views

Tidlig opsporing af kritisk sygdom hos voksne patienter - Center for ...

Tidlig opsporing af kritisk sygdom hos voksne patienter - Center for ...

Tidlig opsporing af kritisk sygdom hos voksne patienter - Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AnbefalingerReferencer at der <strong>for</strong>etages systematisk observation <strong>af</strong> vitale værdier <strong>hos</strong> alle <strong>patienter</strong> med henblik påtidlig <strong>opsporing</strong> <strong>af</strong> <strong>kritisk</strong> <strong>sygdom</strong> [6, 7, 9-10, 14-23]Evidensstyrke A at der udvikles og anvendes standardiseret beslutningsstøtte [26]Evidensstyrke C at observationer indføres i ét standardiseret gr<strong>af</strong>isk system mhp. [11, 13, 26,27, 30]o ensartet registrering <strong>af</strong> alle <strong>patienter</strong> [21]o øget registreringsfrekvens [21]o øget relevant og tilstrækkelig reaktion på <strong>for</strong>værring <strong>af</strong> patientens tilstand vurderet påvitalværdier og/eller score [10, 21]Evidensstyrke B at der anvendes entydig kommunikation faggrupper imellem om <strong>patienter</strong>nes fysiologiskestatus (evt. ved anvendelse <strong>af</strong> scoresystem) [25]Evidensstyrke C at personale er uddannet io observation <strong>af</strong> vitale værdier [4, 6, 8, 27]o scoring <strong>af</strong> vitale værdier [6, 8, 15, 21, 27]o dokumentation <strong>af</strong> vitale værdier [8, 14, 27]o handling på observerede vitale værdier [3, 4, 6, 8, 25, 27, 29]Evidensstyrke A at observations- og scoresystemer ikke anvendes som erstatning <strong>for</strong> densundhedsprofessionelle viden og erfaring, men som supplement til ”Det kliniske blik” [7, 30,32]Evidensstyrke AAnbefaling: Alle <strong>patienter</strong> scores mindst en gang i døgnet med mindre andet er ordineret.Indikator: Andel <strong>af</strong> scorede <strong>patienter</strong> samt <strong>patienter</strong>,hvor årsagen til manglende score er anført.Standard: 95%3. Main DS, Henderson WG, Pratte K et al. Relationship of processes and structure of care in general surgery to postoperativeoutcomes: A descriptive analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:1157-65 C lll4. Fuhrmann L, Lippert A, Perner A et al. Incidence, st<strong>af</strong>f awareness and mortality of patients at risk on general wards.Resuscitation 2008;77:325-30 B llb6. www.operationlife.dkhttp://www.operationlife.dk/Kampagnemateriale/~/media/OL/pdf/vejledning_mobilt%20akut%20team_version2%20%200_juni08.ashx nov 2008 D lv7. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt PE et al. A review, and per<strong>for</strong>mance evaluation, of single-parameter “track and trigger”systems. Resuscitation 2008;79:11-21 A la8. McGaughey J, Alderdice F, Fowler R et al. Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) <strong>for</strong> the prevention of intensive careadmission and death of critically ill adult patients on general <strong>hos</strong>pital wards (Review) . The Cochrane Library 2008;4:1-22 A la9. McQuillan P, Pilkington S, Allan A et al. Confidential inquiry into quality of care be<strong>for</strong>e admission to intensive care. BMJ1998;316:1853-58 B llb10. Goldhill DR, Worthington L, Mulcahy A et al. The patient-at-risk team: identifying and managing seriously ill ward patients .Anaesthesia 1999;54:853-60 C lll11. Paterson R, MacLeod DC, Thet<strong>for</strong>d D et al. Prediction of in-<strong>hos</strong>pital mortality and length of stay using an early warningscoring system: clinical audit. Clin Med 2006; 6:281-84 B ll13. Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA et al. Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems<strong>for</strong> identifying at-risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:667-79 A la14. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt P et al. Hospital-wide physiological surveillance—A new approach to the earlyidentification and management of the sick patient. Resuscitation 2006;71:19-28 C lll15. Buist M, Bernard S, Nguyen TV et al. Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-<strong>hos</strong>pitalmortality: a prospective study . Resuscitation 2004;62:137-41 B llb16. Cuthbertson B, Boroujerdi M, McKie L et al. Can physiological variables and early warning scoring systems allow earlyrecognition of the deteriorating surgical patient?. Crit Care Med 2007;35:402-9 B llb17. Duckitt RW, Buxton-Thomas R, Walker J et al. Worthing physiological scoring system: derivation and validation of aphysiological early-warning system <strong>for</strong> medical admissions. An observational, population-based single-centre study . Br JAnaesth 2007;98:769-74 C llI18. Giuliano KK. Continuous physiologic monitoring and the identification of sepsis . AACN Adv Crit Care 2006;17:215-23 D lv19. Giuliano KK. Physiological monitoring <strong>for</strong> critically ill patients: Testing a predictive model <strong>for</strong> the early detection of sepsis.Afdeling <strong>for</strong> Sygeplejevidenskab • Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 6a • 8000 Aarhus C • Tlf: 8942 4855 mobil 2639 7839

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!