SRI-Teknisk rapport-sen.v13 - DPU

Dorgan, K. (2004). A Year in the Life of an Elementary School: One School's Experiences in Meeting New
Mathematics Standards. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1203-1228.
Ferman, I., Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (2004). The Washback of an EFL National Oral Matriculation Test to
Teaching and Learning. In Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 191-
210p.). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Ferrara, S., & et al. (1988). Local Assessment Responses to a State-Mandated Minimum-Competency Testing
Program: Benefits and Drawbacks (No. ED294892). New Orleans.
Firestone, W. A., Monfils, L., & Schorr, R. Y. (2004). Test Preparation in New Jersey: Inquiry-Oriented and
Didactic Responses. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 11(1), 67-88.
Fuchs, L. S., & et al. (1989). Monitoring Reading Growth Using Student Recalls: Effects of Two Teacher
Feedback Systems. Journal of Educational Research, 83(2), 103-110.
Gayford, C. (1988). Aims, Purposes and Emphasis in Practical Biology at Advanced Level--A Study of
Teachers' Attitudes. School Science Review, 69(249), 799-802.
Goldberg, G. L., & Roswell, B. S. (1999). From perception to practice: The impact of teachers' scoring
experience on performacne-based instruction and classroom assessment. Educational Assessment,
6(4), 257-290.
*Griffin, P. E., & Smith, P. G. (1997, 1997). The implications of outcome-based education for teachers'
work, Brisbane.
Gutkin, J. (1985). The Effect of Diagnostic Inservice Training on Class Reading Achievement and the Number
of Lessons Covered. **
Harlen, W., & Crick, R. D. (2003). A systematic review of the impact on students and teachers of the use
of ICT for assessment of creative and critical thinking skills. London: EPPI.
Harlen, W., & Ruth Deakin, C. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and
tests on students motivation for learning. London: EPPI.
Henderson, S., Petrosino, A., Guckenburg, S., & Hamilton, S. (2007a). Measuring How Benchmark Assessments
Affect Student Achievement. Issues & Answers. REL 2007-No. 039.
Henderson, S., Petrosino, A., Guckenburg, S., & Hamilton, S. (2007b). A Second Follow-Up Year for "Measuring
How Benchmark Assessments Affect Student Achievement." REL Technical Brief. REL 2008-
No. 002.
Higgins, N., & Rice, E. (1991). Teachers' Perspectives on Competency-Based Testing. Educational Technology,
Research and Development, 39(3), 59-69.
Howe, M. E., & Thames, D. G. (1996). Mississippi Reading Teachers' Perceptions toward the Interpretation
of Results from Reformed Standardized Assessment in Mississippi. not found(not found), ort.
Izard, J., Jeffrey, P., Silis, G., & Yates, R. (1999). Testing for teaching purposes: application of item
response modelling (IRM) teaching focussed assessment practices and the elimination of learning
failure in schools. In Learning disabilities: advocacy and action (pp. 163- 187): Parkville Vic: Australian
Resource Educators' Association.
Jia, Y., Eslami, Z. R., & Burlbaw, L. M. (2006). ESL Teachers' Perceptions and Factors Influencing Their Use
of Classroom-Based Reading Assessment. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 407-430.
134