23.08.2013 Views

SRI-Teknisk rapport-sen.v13 - DPU

SRI-Teknisk rapport-sen.v13 - DPU

SRI-Teknisk rapport-sen.v13 - DPU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112<br />

(i.e., holding schools accountable, beliefs); (b)<br />

teachers’ support of the<br />

MSPAP for instructional purposes<br />

• Current Instruction and Assessment in the Classroom<br />

(~20 items): (a) degree<br />

to which instruction and assessment reflected each<br />

of the state-defined learning<br />

outcome standards; (b) extent to which instruction<br />

and assessment reflected<br />

reform-oriented problem types • Change in Instruction<br />

and Assessment from 1993 to 1997–1998 (~20<br />

items):<br />

(a) change in emphasis on learning outcomes; (b)<br />

change in emphasis on the<br />

use of reform-oriented problem types<br />

• MSPAP’s Impact on Classroom Instruction and<br />

Assessment (~6 items): (a)<br />

extent to which the MSPAP influenced changes in<br />

the classroom<br />

• Professional Development Support for MSPAP (~8<br />

items): (a) types of activities<br />

related to the MSPAP; (b) amount of professional<br />

development support<br />

The student questionnaires paralleled the teacher<br />

questionnaires when appropriate.<br />

Thus, students were also asked about the nature of<br />

instruction and classroom<br />

assessment activities.<br />

So that individual differences in change can be<br />

modeled and the correlates of<br />

change can be assessed, two levels of statistical<br />

modeling are required (e.g., Bryk<br />

& Raudenbush, 1992). In the first level, Level 1<br />

(within-school model), trends<br />

across the repeated measurements for individual<br />

schools are modeled. At Level 2<br />

(between-schools model), individual differences in<br />

change across schools from<br />

Level 1 are modeled in relation to hypothesized<br />

explanatory factors (e.g., dimensions<br />

from the teacher and student questionnaires, and<br />

the variable of percentage<br />

of free or reduced-price lunches).<br />

Dimensions underlying the questionnaires administered<br />

to teachers and students<br />

from the schools in the sample were hypothesized<br />

to explain individual differences in school performance<br />

with time. However, because of the relatively<br />

small number of schools in the sample, this study<br />

focused on a subset of dimensions<br />

from the questionnaires that may be of more interest<br />

to stakeholders. From<br />

the teacher questionnaire, two dimensions were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!