09.08.2013 Views

Systembruddet som metode.pdf - Forskning

Systembruddet som metode.pdf - Forskning

Systembruddet som metode.pdf - Forskning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Michael Meier Sørensen<br />

<strong>Systembruddet</strong> <strong>som</strong> <strong>metode</strong> – En transformation til ansvar og bevidsthed i senmoderniteten<br />

Det Informationsvidenskabelige Akademi<br />

The disruption of the system as a method<br />

- A transformation to accountability and awareness in the late modern era<br />

Abstract<br />

This master thesis investigates the hypothesis of change as a disruption of routines and habits (the<br />

system) in an attempt to operationalize a method of disrupting the system of Anthony Giddens’ late<br />

modern individual. The purpose is to create a new (self-)awareness and accountability in the late<br />

modern individual in order to ease its ability to accept change in a rapidly changing environment.<br />

The disruption of the system is presented as a synthesis between Giddens and the theories of Julia<br />

Kristeva’s ‘Powers of Horror’. The latter describes how people react when faced with the unknown<br />

and the in-between: the abject. This synthesis makes it possible to regard change, specifically the<br />

transformation of self, as <strong>som</strong>ething aesthetically horrifying and thus the late modern individual<br />

becomes what Kristeva describes as the deject.<br />

The master thesis then develops an overview of the processes in the disruption of the system by<br />

including among others Jørgen Stigels presentation of the aesthetics of experience. The deject’s<br />

construction of identity is investigated as a learning process, so similarities between the following<br />

learning theories are compared to the disruption of the system: learning by expanding (incl. Batesons<br />

double-bind theory), existential learning and transformative learning. The similarities are<br />

summarized as a type of transcendental learning in the disruption of the dejects system.<br />

With this in mind strategic reflexive conversation is evaluated as a method of controlling and<br />

operationalizing the disruption of the system. The internalizing of scenario planning as a new system<br />

for the deject is compared to similar ideas in Buddhist philosophy and finally presented as a possible<br />

draft of the new system of awareness and accountability the thesis set out to create in the deject.<br />

Due to the investigate purpose of this thesis, the ambitious nature of its subject and its many<br />

theoretical implications, it does not attempt to give conclusive answers but instead provides a<br />

theoretical and inspirational overview of surprising similarities and connections between the chosen<br />

theories.<br />

2/60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!