29.07.2013 Views

Gem/åben hele nummeret som PDF - 16:9

Gem/åben hele nummeret som PDF - 16:9

Gem/åben hele nummeret som PDF - 16:9

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 4: Scottish historian Thomas Carlyle<br />

(1795-1881.<br />

Fig. 5.<br />

Fig. 5-7: The political biopic has a long-running tradition in America and includes wellknown<br />

films like W (2008), Nixon (1996) and The Young Mr. Lincoln (1939).<br />

The Political Biopic<br />

A rather vague and often neglected genre, the biopic may generally be<br />

construed as a ‘genre depicting the life of a famous person in an often<br />

dramatic form’ (Schepelern 2010, p. 81; see also Nielsen 2011). This<br />

genre, thus, includes a variety of different films: from musical biopics<br />

(films like Ray [2004] or Walk the Line [2005]) to philosophical biopics<br />

(films dealing with major thinkers such as Voltaire [1933]) and, as<br />

mentioned, political biopics,dealing with people who have (had) a great<br />

influence on political events and the political system (from fictionalized<br />

accounts of presidential lives to films like Malcolm X [1992] or Milk<br />

[2008], about the gay activist Harvey Milk, played by Sean Penn (fig.<br />

8-9)).<br />

We may naturally assume that this genre (as most of Hollywood’s<br />

classical genres) harks back to the infancy, if not the very birth, of<br />

cinema. Even so, says Rick Altman, early biopics like Warner Bros.’<br />

Disraeli (1929) (fig. 10) were not originally produced and advertised as<br />

biopics (Altman 2002, p. 39). “Films are always available for<br />

redefinition […] and genres for realignment,” writes Altman, and,<br />

thusly, political biopics may have existed for many decades, but the<br />

term itself – political biopic – is relatively new and only vaguely<br />

defined (cf. Altman 2002, p. 42-44).<br />

That political biopics are only vaguely defined is hardly a surprise,<br />

given the fact that the biopic is actually a rather vague genre with only<br />

a few, if any, necessary stylistic features. Trying more specifically to<br />

define the political biopic, however, we could point to a number of<br />

features which are often, but not necessarily, seen in such films,<br />

including<br />

An actor playing a central political figure, whose life is depicted<br />

and dramatized;<br />

An emphasis on tour de force acting, particularly the<br />

physical and psychological characteristics of the portrayed<br />

politician, e.g. in relation to facial and bodily appearance, verbal<br />

dexterity, gesticulations and mimicry (2);<br />

A fictionalized account of authentic historical events;<br />

A dual focus on the political figure as a public and private<br />

character;<br />

A success tragedy structure, often juxtaposing a private<br />

and Gus Van Sant’s Milk (2008), about a<br />

lesser known political activist, could both be<br />

considered political biopics. This subgenre,<br />

in other words, can focus on virtually any<br />

kind of political figure who has (had) an<br />

influence on the political system.<br />

Fig. 10: George Arliss stars as the former<br />

British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli in<br />

the 1929 Warner Bros. film Disraeli, which<br />

is known today as an early political biopic.<br />

The film, however, was never produced and<br />

sold using that nomenclature.<br />

2) In the wording of this particular passage<br />

I am indebted to Jakob Isak Nielsen, who<br />

has edited this article.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!