26.07.2013 Views

Oldtidsagre - Genstandskundskab

Oldtidsagre - Genstandskundskab

Oldtidsagre - Genstandskundskab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156 Nr.1<br />

here at some time in the first century A. D., when the youngest houses were given<br />

up. In the locality Lunde 2 (No. 101, p. 17), cultivation was also probably continued<br />

in Roman Iron Age, as a couple of clay vessels from that period were found in one<br />

of the balks. In Svendstrup Hovgaards heath (No. 51, pp. 65-69), the “Oldtidsager"system<br />

must have continued into Late Roman Iron Age, as rotation-querns were<br />

found in some of the stone-heaps in the balks.<br />

It has not been possible to date any typical “Oldtidsager"-group in Demnark<br />

to a later period than Late Roman Iron Age. It must be admitted, however, that<br />

dating-material is known only from a minority of the localities. \Ve do not know<br />

with any certainly when the “Oldtidsager"-field-system was finally discarded in<br />

Denmark.<br />

\Ve may assume a near relation between the "<strong>Oldtidsagre</strong>“ and the primitive<br />

ancient plough, the arð. It is probable that the arð and the ancient field-system were<br />

still used for light sandy soil at a period when they had been discarded upon heavy<br />

clayey soil. The ancient field-system must have had undesirable effects on flat land<br />

with heavy soil; the basin-shaped fields would, in such regions, be exposed to imperfect<br />

drainage, especially when the moist subatlantic period had set in in the Early<br />

Iron Age. \Ve must assume that the ancient field-system agreed better with the comparatively<br />

dry subboreal climate of the Bronze Age. Therefore, it is an obvious<br />

possibility that the heavy plough with mould-board and the strip-fields, ridged in the<br />

middle (“Hochäcker”) may have prevailed in the more fertile parts of Denmark at<br />

a time when the arð and the basin-shaped fields were still retained in the less fertile<br />

sandy regions of our country.<br />

This line of reasoning is supported by the fact that the oldest find of a mouldboard<br />

plough in Denmark, the Tømmerby-plough, is dated pollenanalytically to the<br />

Early Pre-Roman Iron Age (STEENSBERG 1937, pp. 252 seqq.). It must be admitted,<br />

however, that we have not succeeded in dating any “Hochäcker" in Denmark to prehistoric<br />

time. Many of the deserted fields of the “Hochäcker"-type in Danish heaths<br />

and woods may safely be placed within historical times. In earlier publications<br />

(HATT 1930 a, pp. 353 seq., 1931, pp. 119-12O), I have set forth the supposition that<br />

the old deserted fields, mentioned by Saxo in the story about king Snjo and the<br />

emigration of the “Longobards", might be of the “Hochäcker"-type. It is, however.<br />

hardly admissible to regard this passage in Saxo's work as a proof of the existence<br />

of such fields; Saxo may also have thought of the remnants of prehistoric cultivations<br />

of the “Oldtidsager"-type, still visible in Topshøj forest, a locality which Saxo knew<br />

personally (cf. No. 117, pp. 117 seq.).<br />

As the mould-board plough must have existed in Denmark in Early Pre-Roman<br />

Iron Age-according to the pollenanalytical dating of the Tømmerby-plough-and as<br />

we have not been able to date any of our deserted fields of the “Hochäcker"-type<br />

to prehistoric times, I have attempted to associate the mould-board plough with a<br />

special type of “<strong>Oldtidsagre</strong>", the long and narrow form, which is known e. g. from<br />

Byrsted heath (HATT 1937, p. 10l). This is, however, hardly admissible. It is more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!