Bedste besvarelse af prisopgaven for 2009 - Justitsministeriet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ydelser ikke skal være kritisable i forvaltningsretlig henseende, må der være tale om beskedne ydelser, som er sædvanemæssige, begrænsede og af enkeltstående karakter. Desuden kan der lovligt modtages en form for gave i forbindelse med jul eller årsskiftet, hvor der må lægges særligt vægt på gavens beskedne karakter, såfremt modtagelsen ikke skal være kritisabel. Der er desuden en form for høflighedsklausul i den forvaltningsretlige regulering, som giver adgang til modtagelse af beskedne gaver som gives i taknemmelighed og i forbindelse med værts- eller gæstestatus ved udenlandsk besøg. Disse gaver er ikke typisk for situationen mellem forretningsforbindelser, men det kan ikke udelukkes, at visse gaver fra forretningsforbindelse vil kunne omfattes af denne høflighedsklausul. 76
VIII. English Summary Recent years have shown an increase in the number of cases concerning public employee’s accepting gifts or benefits potentially conflicting with article 144 of the Danish penal code. In accordance with article 144, it is illegal for an employee of the Danish, foreign or international public service or duty, to receive or demand an undue gift or other benefit. Conversely there are exceptions to this. Under certain circumstances the acceptance of a gift or benefit will not be a breach of article 144; nevertheless it may still be subject to criticism, whereas in other situations an acceptance might not even give reason to warrant such criticism. The cases in question have concerned concert tickets and golf and football trips among other such benefits. Interestingly these cases often have their origins in situations, where the private party supplying the gift and the public employee accepting the gift have a relationship similar to that of private business associates. Such a relation does not seem appropriate, when one party is employed in the public sector; albeit this is the case for many public employees, who have a relatively close connection to the private business environment through their work. This thesis examines where the line between bribery and the legitimate acceptance of gifts and other benefits in the public sector is to be drawn in these situations. This is done by an examination of the relevant parts of the penal code, with emphasis on article 144. Other laws with a relevant relation to the subject will also be used in this context. This mainly includes administrative and tax legislation. The legal text in itself is used for the examination, as well as motives, declarations and similar legal documents in relation to the implementation and changes of the law. The legal litterateur and jurisprudence has also been used and weighted heavily in the assessment of the subject. Via an examination and comparison of the legal area, it is found that there is room for questions and therefore uncertainty in relation to two aspects. One is the assessment of whether a specific acceptance has the necessary link to the public service or duty, which is requirement in accordance with article 144. Secondly is the assessment of whether the gift or benefit in question is to be considered insignificant and therefore not undue and not within the grasp of article 144. The thesis concludes that there cannot be drawn a specific line between bribes and legitimate acceptance of gifts or benefits in these situations, where public employees interact with private business associates. Nevertheless the examination has defined the area further. In order to determinate if such gifts or benefits are legitimate, the financial value and significance of the gift 77
Page 1 and 2:
Grænsen mellem bestikkelse og lovl
Page 3 and 4:
d.3. Hensynet til at sikre borgerne
Page 5 and 6:
II. Metode Til undersøgelsen af mi
Page 7 and 8:
III.A.2 Den strafbare bestikkelsesy
Page 9 and 10:
For at give plads til sådanne pås
Page 11 and 12:
En erkendtlighed i anledningen af e
Page 13 and 14:
ansvarssubjektet blev begrundet i
Page 15 and 16:
IV. De strafferetlige regler om bes
Page 17 and 18:
offentlige institution. 28 Der kan
Page 19 and 20:
IV.C.2.3. En pligtstridig eller ube
Page 21 and 22:
lejligheder nævnes i personalestyr
Page 23 and 24:
en uberettiget gave. 56 I U.1982.77
Page 25 and 26: IV.D. Straffelovens § 144 Straffel
Page 27 and 28: medarbejdere og ansatte med en løs
Page 29 and 30: afgørende. Disse momenter kan til
Page 31 and 32: IV.D.2.3. Sammenhæng med en bestem
Page 33 and 34: eller ”med hensyn til” sine emb
Page 35 and 36: modtaget en hel del gaver og andre
Page 37 and 38: hvad formålet med alle de gaver og
Page 39 and 40: straffelovens kapitel 10 om straffe
Page 41 and 42: a. Analyse af hvilket skøn der lig
Page 43 and 44: forholdet kan siges at have en såd
Page 45 and 46: I U.1983.990H, lagde Højesteret v
Page 47 and 48: .3. Uberettigede fordele og repræs
Page 49 and 50: ”Sagligheden” i vurderingen af
Page 51 and 52: forsøg på at kamuflere bestikkels
Page 53 and 54: forbindelse vil den som udgangspunk
Page 55 and 56: tjenestemandslovens § 24 skal der
Page 57 and 58: V. Andre regler om modtagelse af ga
Page 59 and 60: håndteringen af forskellige situat
Page 61 and 62: V.A.4. Delkonklusion De ovenståend
Page 63 and 64: ulovbestemt grundlag, hvorimod poli
Page 65 and 66: samfundsholdning. Det fremgår endv
Page 67 and 68: V.C.3. Delkonklusion For så vidt a
Page 69 and 70: VI. Konklusion Efter straffelovens
Page 71 and 72: påskønnelse af embedsmanden færd
Page 73 and 74: Der er under alle omstændigheder i
Page 75: Der kan ikke svares helt præcist p
Page 79 and 80: IX. Litteraturliste Bøger Gammelto
Page 81: Almindelig borgerlig straffelov af
show all

Bedste besvarelse af prisopgaven for 2009 - Justitsministeriet

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?