5. Integration på arbejdsmarkedet
5. Integration på arbejdsmarkedet
5. Integration på arbejdsmarkedet
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
we discuss which groups, which should be integrated, and the different barriers in this process<br />
of integration. We look as well at how globalisation, the European Union, and how the different<br />
national conditions affect solidarity.<br />
The research shows, that the development towards more modern production forms hampers<br />
the labour forces`s solidarity towards people with reduced working abilities, but at the same<br />
time there are conditions that also encourage solidarity. The technological development and<br />
the increased competition results in greater demands on the workforce, but at the same time<br />
the labour market is getting more flexible and solidarity is made possible - between people<br />
that one doesn`t have immediate common interests with, and this could increase the chances<br />
of integration. Apart from this, the research confirms, that solidarity and integration possibilities<br />
have very different chances in different types of companies. Even though this research<br />
points to the fact, that there is solidarity at companies, that support possibilities for integration<br />
of people with reduced working abilities, it does not include the most vulnerable group. The<br />
people that the companies can tolerate have to be so skilful, that they are considered equals,<br />
and only in very limited situations be a liability in production.<br />
Therefore we suggest various different initiatives to promote solidarity both at company level<br />
and in the society. First and foremost methods should be worked out on how to make it evident,<br />
that it can be free of expenditure to integrate people with reduced work abilities. In addition<br />
to this, employees should have possibilities at the work place to show solidarity, and discussions<br />
among employers and employees about attitude should be encouraged. Trade unions<br />
should to a greater extent give priority to the weakest groups, and there should be support<br />
from the shop stewards. At the societal level it could be an advantage, that there is a continued<br />
monitoring in this area, combined with more initiatives, that takes into account companies’<br />
efficiency plans. On the other hand the state should give priority to the initiatives offered to<br />
the group of citizens that have a realistic chance to get a foothold in the labour market, and at<br />
the same time give reasonable support possibilities to the group, who have to live on income<br />
benefits.<br />
158