Fatter attraction: anthropometric and socioeconomic matching ... - Ivie
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 2: Correlation Matrix. Coefficient of correlation (p-value)<br />
A. Full Sample Wife’s<br />
BMI<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
BMI<br />
Wife’s<br />
Education<br />
Wife’s BMI 1.000<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
Education<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
Log Wage<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s BMI 0.0633<br />
(0.0000)<br />
Wife’s Education −0.1050<br />
(0.0000)<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s Education −0.1362<br />
(0.0000)<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s Log Wage −0.0907<br />
(0.0000)<br />
1.000<br />
−0.0885<br />
(0.0000)<br />
−0.0723<br />
(0.0000)<br />
0.0306<br />
(0.0460)<br />
1.000<br />
0.5678<br />
(0.0000)<br />
0.2736<br />
(0.0000)<br />
1.000<br />
0.3492<br />
(0.0000)<br />
1.000<br />
B. Duration of Wife’s<br />
marriage ≤ 3<br />
BMI<br />
Wife’s BMI 1.000<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
BMI<br />
Wife’s<br />
Education<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
Education<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
Log Wage<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s BMI 0.0572 1.000<br />
(0.0895)<br />
Wife’s Education −0.1310 −0.0878 1.000<br />
(0.0001) (0.0091)<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s Education −0.1948 −0.0599 0.5532 1.000<br />
(0.0000) (0.0805) (0.0000)<br />
Husb<strong>and</strong>’s Log Wage −0.1125 0.0928 0.2008 0.2567 1.000<br />
(0.0008) (0.0059) (0.0000) (0.0000)<br />
Note: We consider individuals who are in the normal-overweight range, BMI [18.5, 30). Wife’s<br />
age is in the range [20, 50].<br />
26
Change language