IS IT FAIR FOR SHAKESPEARE TO OVERSHADOW CERVANTES

IS IT FAIR FOR SHAKESPEARE TO OVERSHADOW CERVANTES?
Introduction
First of all, I think that the article is a criticism about how the people know important
writers for their works. Shakespeare has a more commercial work and is much
popular due at promoters that always remind of the people this work, also the
Shakespeare’s work was easier to understand and to adapt.
While that Shakespeare live searched get to thousands of people across of bard's
stage plays, for the other hand, the promoters of Cervantes introduced exhibitions
and conferences in big city museums and libraries, so boring. These activities for
celebration the live of Cervantes is less striking than of the celebration for
Shakespeare.
Main idea
The celebration for the live of Cervantes and him literary is less showy than
Shakespeare’s how if Cervantes was a common writer without importance.
Shakespeare is popular because him work was easier its adaption to the screen,
and this adaptions have been successful.
Conclusion
To sum up, I believe that the celebration for the live of Shakespeare
and him literary was showier than Cervantes, is how if Cervantes was a common
writer without importance.
Basically, people don’t read the Quixote because is very large and never finish and
it is frustrating.
Maybe, the Spanish culture avoid to do celebrations about this writer because is
associate with a negative culture experience.
The Shakespeare life was published in many newspapers around of the world,
there is the answer why it is popular.
The top institutions don´t show interest for give to known the Cervantes live.